评估人机交互的基准:从人与动物的交互中学到的经验教训

E. Lagerstedt, Serge Thill
{"title":"评估人机交互的基准:从人与动物的交互中学到的经验教训","authors":"E. Lagerstedt, Serge Thill","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-robot interaction (HRI) is fundamentally concerned with studying the interaction between humans and robots. While it is still a relatively young field, it can draw inspiration from other disciplines studying human interaction with other types of agents. Often, such inspiration is sought from the study of human-computer interaction (HCI) and the social sciences studying human-human interaction (HHI). More rarely, the field also turns to human-animal interaction (HAI).In this paper, we identify two distinct underlying motivations for making such comparisons: to form a target to recreate or to obtain a benchmark (or baseline) for evaluation. We further highlight relevant (existing) overlap between HRI and HAI, and identify specific themes that are of particular interest for further trans-disciplinary exploration. At the same time, since robots and animals are clearly not the same, we also discuss important differences between HRI and HAI, their complementarity notwithstanding. The overall purpose of this discussion is thus to create an awareness of the potential mutual benefit between the two disciplines and to describe opportunities that exist for future work, both in terms of new domains to explore, and existing results to learn from.","PeriodicalId":383722,"journal":{"name":"2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarks for evaluating human-robot interaction: lessons learned from human-animal interactions\",\"authors\":\"E. Lagerstedt, Serge Thill\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human-robot interaction (HRI) is fundamentally concerned with studying the interaction between humans and robots. While it is still a relatively young field, it can draw inspiration from other disciplines studying human interaction with other types of agents. Often, such inspiration is sought from the study of human-computer interaction (HCI) and the social sciences studying human-human interaction (HHI). More rarely, the field also turns to human-animal interaction (HAI).In this paper, we identify two distinct underlying motivations for making such comparisons: to form a target to recreate or to obtain a benchmark (or baseline) for evaluation. We further highlight relevant (existing) overlap between HRI and HAI, and identify specific themes that are of particular interest for further trans-disciplinary exploration. At the same time, since robots and animals are clearly not the same, we also discuss important differences between HRI and HAI, their complementarity notwithstanding. The overall purpose of this discussion is thus to create an awareness of the potential mutual benefit between the two disciplines and to describe opportunities that exist for future work, both in terms of new domains to explore, and existing results to learn from.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

人机交互(Human-robot interaction, HRI)主要研究人与机器人之间的交互作用。虽然这仍然是一个相对年轻的领域,但它可以从其他研究人类与其他类型代理相互作用的学科中汲取灵感。通常,这种灵感是从人机交互(HCI)和研究人机交互(HHI)的社会科学的研究中寻求的。更罕见的是,该领域也转向人与动物的相互作用(HAI)。在本文中,我们确定了进行这种比较的两个不同的潜在动机:形成一个重新创建的目标或获得一个基准(或基线)进行评估。我们进一步强调了HRI和HAI之间的相关(现有)重叠,并确定了对进一步跨学科探索特别感兴趣的特定主题。同时,由于机器人和动物显然不一样,我们也讨论了HRI和HAI之间的重要区别,尽管它们具有互补性。因此,本次讨论的总体目的是建立对两个学科之间潜在互惠利益的认识,并描述存在于未来工作中的机会,无论是在探索的新领域方面,还是从现有的结果中学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarks for evaluating human-robot interaction: lessons learned from human-animal interactions
Human-robot interaction (HRI) is fundamentally concerned with studying the interaction between humans and robots. While it is still a relatively young field, it can draw inspiration from other disciplines studying human interaction with other types of agents. Often, such inspiration is sought from the study of human-computer interaction (HCI) and the social sciences studying human-human interaction (HHI). More rarely, the field also turns to human-animal interaction (HAI).In this paper, we identify two distinct underlying motivations for making such comparisons: to form a target to recreate or to obtain a benchmark (or baseline) for evaluation. We further highlight relevant (existing) overlap between HRI and HAI, and identify specific themes that are of particular interest for further trans-disciplinary exploration. At the same time, since robots and animals are clearly not the same, we also discuss important differences between HRI and HAI, their complementarity notwithstanding. The overall purpose of this discussion is thus to create an awareness of the potential mutual benefit between the two disciplines and to describe opportunities that exist for future work, both in terms of new domains to explore, and existing results to learn from.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Adaptive Control Approach to Robotic Assembly with Uncertainties in Vision and Dynamics Affective Touch Robots with Changing Textures and Movements Interactive Robotic Systems as Boundary-Crossing Robots – the User’s View* Development of a Learning-Based Intention Detection Framework for Power-Assisted Manual Wheelchair Users Multi-user Robot Impression with a Virtual Agent and Features Modification According to Real-time Emotion from Physiological Signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1