分布式仿真系统的分层体系结构方法:simar案例

Daniele Gianni
{"title":"分布式仿真系统的分层体系结构方法:simar案例","authors":"Daniele Gianni","doi":"10.1201/b17902-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As soon as the first computers became available, scientists in the most varied disciplines started using them to run mathematical models to predict the behavior and the performance of physical systems. As computational capabilities evolved, simulation became an essential tool in the support of activities in science and systems engineering. Models grew in size and in complexity, and became widely accessible with the advent of free, opensource simulators. In spite of significant, positive advances, the general area of simulation has witnessed growing concerns with the fidelity of results published in research literature. The so-called “crisis of credibility” in the field of network simulation is emblematic of this trend. Through years of investigation, scholars have identified a multiplicity of issues that have conspired against the scientific rigor of network simulation results. The simulation community learned that many of the failures in simulation studies arise from the complexity of the simulation workflow, which introduces several","PeriodicalId":395709,"journal":{"name":"Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Layered architectural approach for distributed simulation systems: The SimArch case\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Gianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/b17902-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As soon as the first computers became available, scientists in the most varied disciplines started using them to run mathematical models to predict the behavior and the performance of physical systems. As computational capabilities evolved, simulation became an essential tool in the support of activities in science and systems engineering. Models grew in size and in complexity, and became widely accessible with the advent of free, opensource simulators. In spite of significant, positive advances, the general area of simulation has witnessed growing concerns with the fidelity of results published in research literature. The so-called “crisis of credibility” in the field of network simulation is emblematic of this trend. Through years of investigation, scholars have identified a multiplicity of issues that have conspired against the scientific rigor of network simulation results. The simulation community learned that many of the failures in simulation studies arise from the complexity of the simulation workflow, which introduces several\",\"PeriodicalId\":395709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/b17902-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/b17902-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一台计算机一问世,各个学科的科学家就开始使用它们来运行数学模型,以预测物理系统的行为和性能。随着计算能力的发展,模拟成为支持科学和系统工程活动的重要工具。模型的大小和复杂性都在增长,并且随着免费、开源模拟器的出现而变得广泛可用。尽管取得了重大的积极进展,但模拟的一般领域已经见证了对研究文献中发表的结果的保真度的日益关注。网络仿真领域的所谓“信誉危机”就是这种趋势的象征。通过多年的调查,学者们已经确定了多种问题,这些问题已经密谋反对网络模拟结果的科学严谨性。仿真社区了解到,仿真研究中的许多失败源于仿真工作流程的复杂性,其中介绍了几个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Layered architectural approach for distributed simulation systems: The SimArch case
As soon as the first computers became available, scientists in the most varied disciplines started using them to run mathematical models to predict the behavior and the performance of physical systems. As computational capabilities evolved, simulation became an essential tool in the support of activities in science and systems engineering. Models grew in size and in complexity, and became widely accessible with the advent of free, opensource simulators. In spite of significant, positive advances, the general area of simulation has witnessed growing concerns with the fidelity of results published in research literature. The so-called “crisis of credibility” in the field of network simulation is emblematic of this trend. Through years of investigation, scholars have identified a multiplicity of issues that have conspired against the scientific rigor of network simulation results. The simulation community learned that many of the failures in simulation studies arise from the complexity of the simulation workflow, which introduces several
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Layered architectural approach for distributed simulation systems: The SimArch case Formal validation methods in model-based spacecraft systems engineering Processes to support the quality of M&S artifacts Collaborative modeling and simulation in spacecraft design System modeling: Principled operationalization of social systems using Presage2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1