低成本GNSS接收机在无人机导航中的部分模糊分辨率比较研究

Xin Liu, Jiaju Guo, Haoli Zhang, Dezhong Zhou, Yanqing Hou
{"title":"低成本GNSS接收机在无人机导航中的部分模糊分辨率比较研究","authors":"Xin Liu, Jiaju Guo, Haoli Zhang, Dezhong Zhou, Yanqing Hou","doi":"10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9987056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares several Ambiguity Resolution (AR) methods, including the Least square AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment (LAMBDA) method, the Modified LAMBDA (MLAMBDA) method, the Two-step Success Rate Criterion (TSRC) method with the low cost GNSS receivers. The algorithms were firstly tested with the low cost ublox F9P dual frequency multi-GNSS receivers in vehicle field test and UAV flight test. The ambiguity fix rate and the Time To First Fix (TTFF) are used as indices to compare the algorithms. Experiments show that the Co-LAMBDA algorithm achieves a TTFF of 480 epochs and a fix rate of 53.7%, and the TSRC algorithm achieves a TTFF of 112 epochs and a fix rate of 91.3%. It can be seen that TSRC algorithm has better performance in both TTFF and fix rate in the low cost GNSS UAV dynamic positioning applications. Then the algorithms were tested with a quasi-dynamic medium-long baseline Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) experiment, a total of 970 experimental results verify that the TSRC algorithm improves the median fix rate from 41.51% to 90.83%, and the median correct rate slightly degrades from 100% to 96.98%, which is reasonable since it computes the statistics from many more fixed-solution samples.","PeriodicalId":345773,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial Ambiguity Resolution for Low Cost GNSS Receiver in UAV Navigation Applications: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Xin Liu, Jiaju Guo, Haoli Zhang, Dezhong Zhou, Yanqing Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9987056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares several Ambiguity Resolution (AR) methods, including the Least square AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment (LAMBDA) method, the Modified LAMBDA (MLAMBDA) method, the Two-step Success Rate Criterion (TSRC) method with the low cost GNSS receivers. The algorithms were firstly tested with the low cost ublox F9P dual frequency multi-GNSS receivers in vehicle field test and UAV flight test. The ambiguity fix rate and the Time To First Fix (TTFF) are used as indices to compare the algorithms. Experiments show that the Co-LAMBDA algorithm achieves a TTFF of 480 epochs and a fix rate of 53.7%, and the TSRC algorithm achieves a TTFF of 112 epochs and a fix rate of 91.3%. It can be seen that TSRC algorithm has better performance in both TTFF and fix rate in the low cost GNSS UAV dynamic positioning applications. Then the algorithms were tested with a quasi-dynamic medium-long baseline Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) experiment, a total of 970 experimental results verify that the TSRC algorithm improves the median fix rate from 41.51% to 90.83%, and the median correct rate slightly degrades from 100% to 96.98%, which is reasonable since it computes the statistics from many more fixed-solution samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9987056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9987056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将最小二乘歧义去相关平差法(LAMBDA)、改进LAMBDA法(MLAMBDA)、两步成功率准则法(TSRC)等几种歧义解决方法与低成本GNSS接收机进行了比较。首先在低成本ublox F9P双频多gnss接收机上进行了车辆现场试验和无人机飞行试验。以歧义修复率和首次修复时间(Time To First fix, TTFF)作为比较算法的指标。实验表明,Co-LAMBDA算法的TTFF为480个epoch,固定率为53.7%,TSRC算法的TTFF为112个epoch,固定率为91.3%。可以看出,在低成本GNSS无人机动态定位应用中,TSRC算法在TTFF和固定率方面都具有更好的性能。然后通过准动态中长期基线实时运动学(RTK)实验对算法进行了测试,共970个实验结果验证,TSRC算法将中位数固定率从41.51%提高到90.83%,中位数正确率从100%略微下降到96.98%,这是合理的,因为它计算了更多固定解样本的统计量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Partial Ambiguity Resolution for Low Cost GNSS Receiver in UAV Navigation Applications: A Comparative Study
This paper compares several Ambiguity Resolution (AR) methods, including the Least square AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment (LAMBDA) method, the Modified LAMBDA (MLAMBDA) method, the Two-step Success Rate Criterion (TSRC) method with the low cost GNSS receivers. The algorithms were firstly tested with the low cost ublox F9P dual frequency multi-GNSS receivers in vehicle field test and UAV flight test. The ambiguity fix rate and the Time To First Fix (TTFF) are used as indices to compare the algorithms. Experiments show that the Co-LAMBDA algorithm achieves a TTFF of 480 epochs and a fix rate of 53.7%, and the TSRC algorithm achieves a TTFF of 112 epochs and a fix rate of 91.3%. It can be seen that TSRC algorithm has better performance in both TTFF and fix rate in the low cost GNSS UAV dynamic positioning applications. Then the algorithms were tested with a quasi-dynamic medium-long baseline Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) experiment, a total of 970 experimental results verify that the TSRC algorithm improves the median fix rate from 41.51% to 90.83%, and the median correct rate slightly degrades from 100% to 96.98%, which is reasonable since it computes the statistics from many more fixed-solution samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UNF-SLAM: Unsupervised Feature Extraction Network for Visual-Laser Fusion SLAM Automatic Spinal Ultrasound Image Segmentation and Deployment for Real-time Spine Volumetric Reconstruction Track Matching Method of Sea Surface Targets Based on Improved Longest Common Subsequence Algorithm A dynamic event-triggered leader-following consensus algorithm for multi-AUVs system Adaptive Multi-feature Fusion Improved ECO-HC Image Tracking Algorithm Based on Confidence Judgement for UAV Reconnaissance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1