smarca4缺失型子宫肉瘤和未分化子宫内膜癌是不同的临床病理实体

D. Kolin, C. Quick, Fei Dong, C. Fletcher, C. Stewart, Anita Soma, J. Hornick, M. Nucci, B. Howitt
{"title":"smarca4缺失型子宫肉瘤和未分化子宫内膜癌是不同的临床病理实体","authors":"D. Kolin, C. Quick, Fei Dong, C. Fletcher, C. Stewart, Anita Soma, J. Hornick, M. Nucci, B. Howitt","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000001375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDEC) are aggressive uterine tumors which may show loss of expression of SMARCA4 (BRG1) or SMARCB1 (INI-1). The recently described SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (SDUS) has a morphology which overlaps with UDEC. In this study, we compared clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics to identify features which differentiate SDUS from UDEC. Cases of SDUS (n=12) were compared with cases of UDEC (n=84, 55 of which were previously published). Immunohistochemistry was performed for p53, mismatch repair proteins, claudin-4, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1. Targeted molecular profiling was performed on 15 cases. Patients with SDUS were significantly younger than those with UDEC (mean 35.8 vs. 61.2 y, P=0.0001). UDEC and SDUS showed morphologic overlap; however, phyllodiform architecture favored a diagnosis of SDUS (36% vs. 0%, P=0.005), while prominent nuclear pleomorphism was only seen in some cases of UDEC (0% vs. 24%, P=0.15). Compared with SDUS, UDEC more frequently showed TP53 mutations (0% vs. 34%, P=0.03), microsatellite instability (0% vs. 44%, P=0.006), and intact SMARCA4 and SMARCB1 (0% vs. 80%); a panel combining these immunohistochemical markers had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92% in distinguishing SDUS and UDEC. Cases of UDEC had mutations in genes associated with endometrial adenocarcinomas (eg, TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA) and occasionally SMARCA4, while SDUS was characterized solely by inactivating mutations in SMARCA4. Disease-specific survival was shorter in SDUS than UDEC (median survival 9 and 36 mo, P=0.01). In conclusion, SDUS occurs in younger patients than UDEC, has a worse prognosis, and in most cases has a distinct molecular and immunohistochemical profile.","PeriodicalId":275221,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SMARCA4-deficient Uterine Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma Are Distinct Clinicopathologic Entities\",\"authors\":\"D. Kolin, C. Quick, Fei Dong, C. Fletcher, C. Stewart, Anita Soma, J. Hornick, M. Nucci, B. Howitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAS.0000000000001375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDEC) are aggressive uterine tumors which may show loss of expression of SMARCA4 (BRG1) or SMARCB1 (INI-1). The recently described SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (SDUS) has a morphology which overlaps with UDEC. In this study, we compared clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics to identify features which differentiate SDUS from UDEC. Cases of SDUS (n=12) were compared with cases of UDEC (n=84, 55 of which were previously published). Immunohistochemistry was performed for p53, mismatch repair proteins, claudin-4, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1. Targeted molecular profiling was performed on 15 cases. Patients with SDUS were significantly younger than those with UDEC (mean 35.8 vs. 61.2 y, P=0.0001). UDEC and SDUS showed morphologic overlap; however, phyllodiform architecture favored a diagnosis of SDUS (36% vs. 0%, P=0.005), while prominent nuclear pleomorphism was only seen in some cases of UDEC (0% vs. 24%, P=0.15). Compared with SDUS, UDEC more frequently showed TP53 mutations (0% vs. 34%, P=0.03), microsatellite instability (0% vs. 44%, P=0.006), and intact SMARCA4 and SMARCB1 (0% vs. 80%); a panel combining these immunohistochemical markers had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92% in distinguishing SDUS and UDEC. Cases of UDEC had mutations in genes associated with endometrial adenocarcinomas (eg, TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA) and occasionally SMARCA4, while SDUS was characterized solely by inactivating mutations in SMARCA4. Disease-specific survival was shorter in SDUS than UDEC (median survival 9 and 36 mo, P=0.01). In conclusion, SDUS occurs in younger patients than UDEC, has a worse prognosis, and in most cases has a distinct molecular and immunohistochemical profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

摘要

补充数字内容可在文本中找到。未分化和去分化子宫内膜癌(UDEC)是侵袭性子宫肿瘤,可能表现为SMARCA4 (BRG1)或SMARCB1 (ni -1)的表达缺失。最近报道的smarca4缺陷未分化子宫肉瘤(SDUS)具有与UDEC重叠的形态。在这项研究中,我们比较了临床、形态学、免疫组织化学和分子特征,以确定区分SDUS和UDEC的特征。将SDUS病例(n=12)与UDEC病例(n=84,其中55例已发表)进行比较。对p53、错配修复蛋白、claudin-4、SMARCA4和SMARCB1进行免疫组化。对15例患者进行靶向分子谱分析。SDUS患者明显比UDEC患者年轻(平均35.8岁vs. 61.2岁,P=0.0001)。UDEC与SDUS形态重叠;然而,叶状异构体结构有利于SDUS的诊断(36%对0%,P=0.005),而突出的核多形性仅在部分UDEC病例中可见(0%对24%,P=0.15)。与SDUS相比,UDEC更频繁地出现TP53突变(0%比34%,P=0.03)、微卫星不稳定性(0%比44%,P=0.006)和完整的SMARCA4和SMARCB1(0%比80%);结合这些免疫组织化学标记物的小组在区分SDUS和UDEC方面的敏感性为100%,特异性为92%。UDEC病例中有与子宫内膜腺癌相关的基因突变(如TP53、PTEN、PIK3CA),偶尔也有SMARCA4突变,而SDUS仅以SMARCA4失活突变为特征。SDUS患者的疾病特异性生存期短于UDEC患者(中位生存期9个月和36个月,P=0.01)。总之,SDUS发生在比UDEC更年轻的患者中,预后更差,并且在大多数情况下具有独特的分子和免疫组织化学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SMARCA4-deficient Uterine Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma Are Distinct Clinicopathologic Entities
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDEC) are aggressive uterine tumors which may show loss of expression of SMARCA4 (BRG1) or SMARCB1 (INI-1). The recently described SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (SDUS) has a morphology which overlaps with UDEC. In this study, we compared clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics to identify features which differentiate SDUS from UDEC. Cases of SDUS (n=12) were compared with cases of UDEC (n=84, 55 of which were previously published). Immunohistochemistry was performed for p53, mismatch repair proteins, claudin-4, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1. Targeted molecular profiling was performed on 15 cases. Patients with SDUS were significantly younger than those with UDEC (mean 35.8 vs. 61.2 y, P=0.0001). UDEC and SDUS showed morphologic overlap; however, phyllodiform architecture favored a diagnosis of SDUS (36% vs. 0%, P=0.005), while prominent nuclear pleomorphism was only seen in some cases of UDEC (0% vs. 24%, P=0.15). Compared with SDUS, UDEC more frequently showed TP53 mutations (0% vs. 34%, P=0.03), microsatellite instability (0% vs. 44%, P=0.006), and intact SMARCA4 and SMARCB1 (0% vs. 80%); a panel combining these immunohistochemical markers had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92% in distinguishing SDUS and UDEC. Cases of UDEC had mutations in genes associated with endometrial adenocarcinomas (eg, TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA) and occasionally SMARCA4, while SDUS was characterized solely by inactivating mutations in SMARCA4. Disease-specific survival was shorter in SDUS than UDEC (median survival 9 and 36 mo, P=0.01). In conclusion, SDUS occurs in younger patients than UDEC, has a worse prognosis, and in most cases has a distinct molecular and immunohistochemical profile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superficial CD34-Positive Fibroblastic Tumor Localized Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma (LMPeM) in Women: A Clinicopathologic Study of 18 Cases Gastroesophageal Glomus Tumors “Malignant Mesenchymoma” Revisited Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Characterization of Sarcomatoid Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1