捷克法律风格中的“公共秩序”概念

Terezie Smejkalová, Markéta Štěpáníková
{"title":"捷克法律风格中的“公共秩序”概念","authors":"Terezie Smejkalová, Markéta Štěpáníková","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9972-2021-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we report the findings of a part of a wider complex research related to social representations approach in understanding vague legal concepts. In the course of our research, we have explored our participants’ understanding of public order in a very similar setting to the one presented in this case. Their understanding seems to suggest that although public order points towards basic values of a given society, some of our participants suggest that it is a concept whose interpretation remains strictly legal, confining the judge to – sometimes incomplete – information provided by formal legal sources or legal doctrine. While such a confinement may result in weak argumentation, we believe it may also be explainable in terms of normativist and formalistic tendencies present in the Czech legal culture.","PeriodicalId":346548,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation 2021","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualization of ‘Public Order’ within Czech Legal Style\",\"authors\":\"Terezie Smejkalová, Markéta Štěpáníková\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9972-2021-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we report the findings of a part of a wider complex research related to social representations approach in understanding vague legal concepts. In the course of our research, we have explored our participants’ understanding of public order in a very similar setting to the one presented in this case. Their understanding seems to suggest that although public order points towards basic values of a given society, some of our participants suggest that it is a concept whose interpretation remains strictly legal, confining the judge to – sometimes incomplete – information provided by formal legal sources or legal doctrine. While such a confinement may result in weak argumentation, we believe it may also be explainable in terms of normativist and formalistic tendencies present in the Czech legal culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumentation 2021\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumentation 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9972-2021-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9972-2021-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们报告了与理解模糊法律概念的社会表征方法相关的更广泛的复杂研究的一部分结果。在我们的研究过程中,我们探索了参与者在与本案例非常相似的环境中对公共秩序的理解。他们的理解似乎表明,虽然公共秩序指向某一社会的基本价值,但我们的一些与会者认为,对这一概念的解释仍然是严格合法的,将法官局限于- -有时是不完整的- -正式法律来源或法律学说所提供的信息。虽然这种限制可能导致论点薄弱,但我们认为,从捷克法律文化中存在的规范主义和形式主义倾向来看,这也是可以解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptualization of ‘Public Order’ within Czech Legal Style
In this paper, we report the findings of a part of a wider complex research related to social representations approach in understanding vague legal concepts. In the course of our research, we have explored our participants’ understanding of public order in a very similar setting to the one presented in this case. Their understanding seems to suggest that although public order points towards basic values of a given society, some of our participants suggest that it is a concept whose interpretation remains strictly legal, confining the judge to – sometimes incomplete – information provided by formal legal sources or legal doctrine. While such a confinement may result in weak argumentation, we believe it may also be explainable in terms of normativist and formalistic tendencies present in the Czech legal culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conceptualization of ‘Public Order’ within Czech Legal Style Do Not Ignore the Elephant... Exploring the Role of Intuition and Experience in Judicial Decision-Making The Dynamics of Consent and Antagonism in Ian McDonald’s Luna Trilogy The Concept of Legal Language: Law is Language Vagueness and Theory of Gaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1