使用水溶性造影剂(gastrografin®)无预处理的注肠造影检查的有效性

英彦 松川, 伸之 白神, 敏光 継, 美穂 足立, 正治 宮澤, 一男 柏崎, 紀文 日比
{"title":"使用水溶性造影剂(gastrografin®)无预处理的注肠造影检查的有效性","authors":"英彦 松川, 伸之 白神, 敏光 継, 美穂 足立, 正治 宮澤, 一男 柏崎, 紀文 日比","doi":"10.11405/NISSHOSHI.104.1344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Conventional colonoscopy and barium enema are the main examinations for colonic lesions, but each of them has different limitations according to the condition of the patient. It has been reported that preparations for these examinations also caused complications, such as colonic perforation leading to fatality. To avoid these complications, colonic enema with water-soluble contrast medium (Gatrografin) has been performed as a screening method for those suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases, or those in whom it was difficult to be form colonoscopy and barium enema because of their poor condition. There are few reports about water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE). We retrospectively examined 121 cases of WSCE performed from January 2004 to December 2005 and assessed the acceptability of examination and its ability to detect colonic lesions. We divided our patients into five groups according to the reason for performing WSCE. In all cases, we were able to perform WSCE without complications and assess colonic lesions. In 58 cases, we compared the results of WSCE with those of barium enema or colonoscopy, or both In 8 cases we missed small colonic polyps and erosions, but we missed only one large polyp 3 cm in diameter, which we detected retrospectively. In conclusion, WSCE is safe and useful for the diagnosis of colonic disease, and may be one of the choices of colonic examination especially for those who are suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases or hemorrhagic lesions as well as for those in whom it is difficult to perform barium enema or colonoscopy.","PeriodicalId":341053,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"水溶性造影剤(ガストログラフィン®)を用いた前処置なしの注腸造影検査の有用性\",\"authors\":\"英彦 松川, 伸之 白神, 敏光 継, 美穂 足立, 正治 宮澤, 一男 柏崎, 紀文 日比\",\"doi\":\"10.11405/NISSHOSHI.104.1344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Conventional colonoscopy and barium enema are the main examinations for colonic lesions, but each of them has different limitations according to the condition of the patient. It has been reported that preparations for these examinations also caused complications, such as colonic perforation leading to fatality. To avoid these complications, colonic enema with water-soluble contrast medium (Gatrografin) has been performed as a screening method for those suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases, or those in whom it was difficult to be form colonoscopy and barium enema because of their poor condition. There are few reports about water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE). We retrospectively examined 121 cases of WSCE performed from January 2004 to December 2005 and assessed the acceptability of examination and its ability to detect colonic lesions. We divided our patients into five groups according to the reason for performing WSCE. In all cases, we were able to perform WSCE without complications and assess colonic lesions. In 58 cases, we compared the results of WSCE with those of barium enema or colonoscopy, or both In 8 cases we missed small colonic polyps and erosions, but we missed only one large polyp 3 cm in diameter, which we detected retrospectively. In conclusion, WSCE is safe and useful for the diagnosis of colonic disease, and may be one of the choices of colonic examination especially for those who are suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases or hemorrhagic lesions as well as for those in whom it is difficult to perform barium enema or colonoscopy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11405/NISSHOSHI.104.1344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11405/NISSHOSHI.104.1344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

常规结肠镜检查和钡灌肠检查是结肠病变的主要检查方法,但根据患者的情况,每种检查方法都有不同的局限性。据报道,这些检查的准备工作也引起并发症,如导致死亡的结肠穿孔。为了避免这些并发症的发生,对于怀疑患有梗阻性结肠疾病的患者,或因病情不佳而难以进行结肠镜检查和钡灌肠的患者,采用水溶性造影剂(Gatrografin)结肠灌肠作为筛查方法。关于水溶性造影剂灌肠(WSCE)的报道很少。我们回顾性分析了2004年1月至2005年12月121例WSCE病例,并评估了检查的可接受性及其检测结肠病变的能力。我们根据进行WSCE的原因将患者分为五组。在所有病例中,我们都能够进行无并发症的WSCE,并评估结肠病变。在58例中,我们将WSCE结果与钡灌肠或结肠镜检查结果进行了比较,或两者都进行了比较。8例中我们遗漏了小结肠息肉和糜烂,但我们只遗漏了一个直径为3cm的大息肉,我们回顾性地发现了。综上所述,WSCE对结肠疾病的诊断是安全有效的,尤其对于怀疑有梗阻性结肠疾病或出血性病变的患者,以及难以行钡灌肠或结肠镜检查的患者,可作为结肠检查的选择之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水溶性造影剤(ガストログラフィン®)を用いた前処置なしの注腸造影検査の有用性
: Conventional colonoscopy and barium enema are the main examinations for colonic lesions, but each of them has different limitations according to the condition of the patient. It has been reported that preparations for these examinations also caused complications, such as colonic perforation leading to fatality. To avoid these complications, colonic enema with water-soluble contrast medium (Gatrografin) has been performed as a screening method for those suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases, or those in whom it was difficult to be form colonoscopy and barium enema because of their poor condition. There are few reports about water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE). We retrospectively examined 121 cases of WSCE performed from January 2004 to December 2005 and assessed the acceptability of examination and its ability to detect colonic lesions. We divided our patients into five groups according to the reason for performing WSCE. In all cases, we were able to perform WSCE without complications and assess colonic lesions. In 58 cases, we compared the results of WSCE with those of barium enema or colonoscopy, or both In 8 cases we missed small colonic polyps and erosions, but we missed only one large polyp 3 cm in diameter, which we detected retrospectively. In conclusion, WSCE is safe and useful for the diagnosis of colonic disease, and may be one of the choices of colonic examination especially for those who are suspected to have obstructive colonic diseases or hemorrhagic lesions as well as for those in whom it is difficult to perform barium enema or colonoscopy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
腸管スピロヘータ症(human intestinal spirochetosis;HIS)の臨床的意義についての検討 内視鏡的粘膜下層剥離術(endoscopic submucosal dissection)の1年10カ月後に異時性肝転移をきたした胃神経内分泌癌(neuroendocrine carcinoma)の1例 Trousseau症候群として発症した腸間膜への播種をともなった胃mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue(MALT)リンパ腫の1症例 Helicobacter pylori未感染の胃粘膜に生じた0-IIa+IIc型分化型癌の1例 Low-dose FP療法が奏効した切除不能混合型肝癌の1例
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1