美国共同基金系统风险的随机特性

J. Hillier
{"title":"美国共同基金系统风险的随机特性","authors":"J. Hillier","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.314365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates three possible processes by which mutual fund betas may develop over time. The paper proposes the idea that the underlying structure of fund returns can be interpreted as an indicator of management style. Due to the pressures placed on fund managers to remain within certain risk guidelines, laid out in the funds prospectus, over time the beta of an actively managed fund should exhibit mean reversion. We impose three different time-varying models on mutual fund betas using the Kalman filter algorithm. The three processes are: Firstly a random coefficient with constant mean model where any disturbance or shock to the funds systematic risk in one period has no effect on future beta values, possibly indicating an immediate re-alignment of the funds risk profile by the manager. Secondly an AR(1) model where shocks would have some persistence, and finally a random walk process where shocks will persist indefinitely. Our findings, over all funds in the sample, show an equal split between the random coefficient model and the random walk model. Furthermore, when we split the sample into fund classifications we find that the random walk model dominates the small company funds, suggesting these funds have adopted a more passive management style, possibly due to the reduced liquidity of the underlying stocks. The random coefficient model on the other hand dominates growth funds and speciality funds, indicating a more active management style is being used to counteract any shocks to the underlying systematic risk of the fund.","PeriodicalId":126917,"journal":{"name":"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Stochastic Properties of Systematic Risk for U.S. Mutual Funds\",\"authors\":\"J. Hillier\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.314365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates three possible processes by which mutual fund betas may develop over time. The paper proposes the idea that the underlying structure of fund returns can be interpreted as an indicator of management style. Due to the pressures placed on fund managers to remain within certain risk guidelines, laid out in the funds prospectus, over time the beta of an actively managed fund should exhibit mean reversion. We impose three different time-varying models on mutual fund betas using the Kalman filter algorithm. The three processes are: Firstly a random coefficient with constant mean model where any disturbance or shock to the funds systematic risk in one period has no effect on future beta values, possibly indicating an immediate re-alignment of the funds risk profile by the manager. Secondly an AR(1) model where shocks would have some persistence, and finally a random walk process where shocks will persist indefinitely. Our findings, over all funds in the sample, show an equal split between the random coefficient model and the random walk model. Furthermore, when we split the sample into fund classifications we find that the random walk model dominates the small company funds, suggesting these funds have adopted a more passive management style, possibly due to the reduced liquidity of the underlying stocks. The random coefficient model on the other hand dominates growth funds and speciality funds, indicating a more active management style is being used to counteract any shocks to the underlying systematic risk of the fund.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.314365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.314365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了共同基金贝塔系数随时间发展的三种可能过程。本文提出基金收益的基础结构可以被解释为管理风格的一个指标。由于基金经理承受着保持在基金招股说明书中列出的某些风险指导方针之内的压力,随着时间的推移,积极管理基金的贝塔系数应该呈现均值回归。我们使用卡尔曼滤波算法对共同基金的贝塔系数施加三种不同的时变模型。这三个过程是:首先是一个随机系数的常均值模型,其中一个时期内对基金系统风险的任何干扰或冲击都不会对未来的贝塔值产生影响,这可能表明基金经理立即重新调整了基金的风险概况。其次是AR(1)模型,其中冲击具有一定的持久性,最后是随机游走过程,其中冲击将无限期地持续下去。我们的研究发现,在样本中的所有基金中,随机系数模型和随机游走模型之间的比例相等。此外,当我们将样本分成基金分类时,我们发现随机漫步模型在小公司基金中占主导地位,这表明这些基金采用了更被动的管理风格,可能是由于标的股票的流动性降低。另一方面,随机系数模型在成长型基金和特种基金中占主导地位,表明一种更为积极的管理风格正被用来抵消基金潜在系统性风险的任何冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Stochastic Properties of Systematic Risk for U.S. Mutual Funds
This paper investigates three possible processes by which mutual fund betas may develop over time. The paper proposes the idea that the underlying structure of fund returns can be interpreted as an indicator of management style. Due to the pressures placed on fund managers to remain within certain risk guidelines, laid out in the funds prospectus, over time the beta of an actively managed fund should exhibit mean reversion. We impose three different time-varying models on mutual fund betas using the Kalman filter algorithm. The three processes are: Firstly a random coefficient with constant mean model where any disturbance or shock to the funds systematic risk in one period has no effect on future beta values, possibly indicating an immediate re-alignment of the funds risk profile by the manager. Secondly an AR(1) model where shocks would have some persistence, and finally a random walk process where shocks will persist indefinitely. Our findings, over all funds in the sample, show an equal split between the random coefficient model and the random walk model. Furthermore, when we split the sample into fund classifications we find that the random walk model dominates the small company funds, suggesting these funds have adopted a more passive management style, possibly due to the reduced liquidity of the underlying stocks. The random coefficient model on the other hand dominates growth funds and speciality funds, indicating a more active management style is being used to counteract any shocks to the underlying systematic risk of the fund.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Valuing Companies by Cash Flow Discounting: Ten Methods and Nine Theories Learning About Beta: Time-Varying Factor Loadings, Expected Returns, and the Conditional CAPM Equivalence of the Different Discounted Cash Flow Valuation Methods: Different Alternatives for Determining the Discounted Value of Tax Shields and Their Implications for the Valuation Capital Structure in Venture Finance The International Evidence on Performance and Equity Ownership by Insiders, Blockholders, and Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1