利用知识管理的力量促进创新

Neena Sinha, N. K. Kakkar, Vikas Gupta
{"title":"利用知识管理的力量促进创新","authors":"Neena Sinha, N. K. Kakkar, Vikas Gupta","doi":"10.1504/IJKL.2015.071623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation, the successful exploitation of new ideas, is integration of knowledge with action. Researchers have discovered that knowledge, which includes what the organisation knows, how it uses what it knows and how fast it can know something new, offers a competitive edge to an organisation (Adams and Lamont, 2003; Sinha et al., 2012; McLaughlin and Caraballo, 2013). This paper makes a contribution by conceptualising and empirically testing a knowledge-based framework for innovation by taking up the case of the Indian IT/ITeS sector, specifically, National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) members. The authors surveyed 435 respondents from 46 companies. The findings reveal that five out of nine knowledge management (KM) practices surveyed are relevant, namely culture and leaders' support, KM processes and networking and alliances. However, statistically, the fourth practice, namely, KM strategy, and the fifth, training and development of employees for KM, are not very successful as predictors.","PeriodicalId":163161,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Knowl. Learn.","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing the power of knowledge management for innovation\",\"authors\":\"Neena Sinha, N. K. Kakkar, Vikas Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJKL.2015.071623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Innovation, the successful exploitation of new ideas, is integration of knowledge with action. Researchers have discovered that knowledge, which includes what the organisation knows, how it uses what it knows and how fast it can know something new, offers a competitive edge to an organisation (Adams and Lamont, 2003; Sinha et al., 2012; McLaughlin and Caraballo, 2013). This paper makes a contribution by conceptualising and empirically testing a knowledge-based framework for innovation by taking up the case of the Indian IT/ITeS sector, specifically, National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) members. The authors surveyed 435 respondents from 46 companies. The findings reveal that five out of nine knowledge management (KM) practices surveyed are relevant, namely culture and leaders' support, KM processes and networking and alliances. However, statistically, the fourth practice, namely, KM strategy, and the fifth, training and development of employees for KM, are not very successful as predictors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Knowl. Learn.\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Knowl. Learn.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2015.071623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Knowl. Learn.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2015.071623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

创新,即对新思想的成功利用,是知识与行动的结合。研究人员发现,知识,包括组织所知道的,它如何利用它所知道的以及它知道新事物的速度有多快,为组织提供了竞争优势(Adams和Lamont, 2003;Sinha et al., 2012;McLaughlin and Caraballo, 2013)。本文通过对印度IT/ITeS部门,特别是全国软件和服务公司协会(NASSCOM)成员的案例进行概念化和实证测试,从而对基于知识的创新框架做出了贡献。作者调查了46家公司的435名受访者。研究结果显示,在调查的9个知识管理实践中,有5个是相关的,即文化和领导者的支持、知识管理过程和网络和联盟。然而,从统计上看,第四种实践,即知识管理战略和第五种实践,即知识管理员工的培训和发展,并不是很成功的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harnessing the power of knowledge management for innovation
Innovation, the successful exploitation of new ideas, is integration of knowledge with action. Researchers have discovered that knowledge, which includes what the organisation knows, how it uses what it knows and how fast it can know something new, offers a competitive edge to an organisation (Adams and Lamont, 2003; Sinha et al., 2012; McLaughlin and Caraballo, 2013). This paper makes a contribution by conceptualising and empirically testing a knowledge-based framework for innovation by taking up the case of the Indian IT/ITeS sector, specifically, National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) members. The authors surveyed 435 respondents from 46 companies. The findings reveal that five out of nine knowledge management (KM) practices surveyed are relevant, namely culture and leaders' support, KM processes and networking and alliances. However, statistically, the fourth practice, namely, KM strategy, and the fifth, training and development of employees for KM, are not very successful as predictors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identification, assessment and ranking agile software development critical success factors - a factor analysis approach Higher education and financial crisis: a systematic literature review and future research agenda Modelling an environmental context for collaborative research productivity: perceptions about knowledge sharing from Pakistani universities Effect of organisational learning and knowledge management on organisational performance in HEI, India Cooperation and relationship in the triple helix model of innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1