第358/2022号宪法法院判决对法院判决的影响。司法错误的适用

Delia-Mihaela Marinescu
{"title":"第358/2022号宪法法院判决对法院判决的影响。司法错误的适用","authors":"Delia-Mihaela Marinescu","doi":"10.51865/jetc.2022.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prescription of criminal liability presupposes the extinction of the criminal legal relationship appeared as a result of committing a crime due to the fact that it was not committed within a certain term established by law, which affects and empties the idea of criminal repression and prevention. The main objective of this research is related to the exposure of the effects of the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 358/2022 with reference to Decision no. 297/2018 by which the phrase “by fulfilling any procedural act in question” from the content of art. 155, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, especially from the perspective of multiple issues that may be defended in practice, which also determines the possibility of the existence of a judicial error. The article analyses the content of the two decisions of the Constitutional Court, but also their implications identified in the practice of the courts, taking into account the importance of respecting the principle of legality, but also the observance of the rights of the parties in a criminal trial.","PeriodicalId":149715,"journal":{"name":"Jus et Civitas – A Journal of Social and Legal Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of the decision of the Constitutional Court no 358/2022 on court decisions. Application of judicial error\",\"authors\":\"Delia-Mihaela Marinescu\",\"doi\":\"10.51865/jetc.2022.01.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prescription of criminal liability presupposes the extinction of the criminal legal relationship appeared as a result of committing a crime due to the fact that it was not committed within a certain term established by law, which affects and empties the idea of criminal repression and prevention. The main objective of this research is related to the exposure of the effects of the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 358/2022 with reference to Decision no. 297/2018 by which the phrase “by fulfilling any procedural act in question” from the content of art. 155, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, especially from the perspective of multiple issues that may be defended in practice, which also determines the possibility of the existence of a judicial error. The article analyses the content of the two decisions of the Constitutional Court, but also their implications identified in the practice of the courts, taking into account the importance of respecting the principle of legality, but also the observance of the rights of the parties in a criminal trial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jus et Civitas – A Journal of Social and Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jus et Civitas – A Journal of Social and Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51865/jetc.2022.01.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jus et Civitas – A Journal of Social and Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51865/jetc.2022.01.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刑事责任的规定预设了因犯罪未在法律规定的一定期限内实施而产生的刑事法律关系的消亡,影响和消解了刑事抑制和预防的思想。本研究的主要目的是揭露宪法法院第1号判决的影响。参考第358/2022号决定。297/2018,其中“通过履行任何有关程序行为”一词与艺术内容无关。特别是从实践中可能辩护的多重问题的角度来看,这也决定了司法错误存在的可能性。本文分析了宪法法院的两项判决的内容,以及它们在法院实践中确定的含义,考虑到尊重合法性原则的重要性,以及在刑事审判中遵守当事人的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of the decision of the Constitutional Court no 358/2022 on court decisions. Application of judicial error
The prescription of criminal liability presupposes the extinction of the criminal legal relationship appeared as a result of committing a crime due to the fact that it was not committed within a certain term established by law, which affects and empties the idea of criminal repression and prevention. The main objective of this research is related to the exposure of the effects of the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 358/2022 with reference to Decision no. 297/2018 by which the phrase “by fulfilling any procedural act in question” from the content of art. 155, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, especially from the perspective of multiple issues that may be defended in practice, which also determines the possibility of the existence of a judicial error. The article analyses the content of the two decisions of the Constitutional Court, but also their implications identified in the practice of the courts, taking into account the importance of respecting the principle of legality, but also the observance of the rights of the parties in a criminal trial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SCHOOL DROPOUT IN ROMANIAN RURAL ENVIRONMENT The effects of the decision of the Constitutional Court no 358/2022 on court decisions. Application of judicial error Pre-service teachers looking for their professional identity SOLIDARITY LIABILITY IN THE EVENT OF WORK-RELATED ACCIDENTS The “mandatory” right to education as means of reintegration into society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1