公平地证明能力,客观地评估创造力

M. Hoffmann
{"title":"公平地证明能力,客观地评估创造力","authors":"M. Hoffmann","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a model-based discussion of terms like skills, competences and creativity, methods for assessment will be analyzed with respect to their applicability in general and in particular to problems of engineering education.","PeriodicalId":146973,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fairly certifying competences, objectively assessing creativity\",\"authors\":\"M. Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After a model-based discussion of terms like skills, competences and creativity, methods for assessment will be analyzed with respect to their applicability in general and in particular to problems of engineering education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在对技能、能力和创造力等术语进行基于模型的讨论之后,将分析评估方法在一般情况下的适用性,特别是在工程教育问题上的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fairly certifying competences, objectively assessing creativity
After a model-based discussion of terms like skills, competences and creativity, methods for assessment will be analyzed with respect to their applicability in general and in particular to problems of engineering education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learner mobility between engineering education and a twenty first century workplace Media literacy worldwide. Similarities and differences of theoretical and practical approaches Remote labs as learning services in the educational arena Perception of French students in engineering about the ethics of their profession and implications for engineering education Harnessing clouds for e-learning: New directions followed by UNED
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1