在在线硕士学位课程中运用工作台辩证法探究模式

H. Gillow-Wiles, M. Niess
{"title":"在在线硕士学位课程中运用工作台辩证法探究模式","authors":"H. Gillow-Wiles, M. Niess","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.CH013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-case descriptive study suggests a model for designing online courses that supports TPACK development through communities of inquiry. Borrowing from the world of science research literature, a workbench dialectic inquiry model was engaged in designing a small group-large group dynamic. Mimicking scientists at the workbench, the participants formed relationships in small groups to develop ideas about TPACK, presented their ideas to the larger, whole-class group, then returned to the small groups to integrate feedback. This dynamic group interaction structure provided the participants with the space to develop their TPACK thinking in ways that supported the transition to cognitive discourse. Analysis of the forum postings revealed the complexity of the participant interaction and suggested that facilitating student community engagement supported the development of their TPACK. Course design details are provided. Further research directions might include applying the workbench dialectic inquiry model in other educational contexts and with larger student populations.","PeriodicalId":256420,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Research on TPACK in the Digital Age","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging a Workbench Dialectic Inquiry Model in an Online Master's Degree Program\",\"authors\":\"H. Gillow-Wiles, M. Niess\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.CH013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This cross-case descriptive study suggests a model for designing online courses that supports TPACK development through communities of inquiry. Borrowing from the world of science research literature, a workbench dialectic inquiry model was engaged in designing a small group-large group dynamic. Mimicking scientists at the workbench, the participants formed relationships in small groups to develop ideas about TPACK, presented their ideas to the larger, whole-class group, then returned to the small groups to integrate feedback. This dynamic group interaction structure provided the participants with the space to develop their TPACK thinking in ways that supported the transition to cognitive discourse. Analysis of the forum postings revealed the complexity of the participant interaction and suggested that facilitating student community engagement supported the development of their TPACK. Course design details are provided. Further research directions might include applying the workbench dialectic inquiry model in other educational contexts and with larger student populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of Research on TPACK in the Digital Age\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of Research on TPACK in the Digital Age\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.CH013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Research on TPACK in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.CH013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这个跨案例的描述性研究提出了一个在线课程的设计模型,通过探究社区来支持TPACK的发展。借鉴世界科学研究文献,采用工作台辩证法探究模型设计小群体-大群体动态。参与者模仿工作台上的科学家,在小组中形成关系,发展关于TPACK的想法,向更大的全班小组展示他们的想法,然后回到小组中整合反馈。这种动态的群体互动结构为参与者提供了发展他们的TPACK思维的空间,以支持向认知话语的过渡。对论坛帖子的分析揭示了参与者互动的复杂性,并建议促进学生社区参与有助于他们的TPACK发展。提供课程设计细节。进一步的研究方向可能包括在其他教育环境和更大的学生群体中应用工作台辩证法探究模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engaging a Workbench Dialectic Inquiry Model in an Online Master's Degree Program
This cross-case descriptive study suggests a model for designing online courses that supports TPACK development through communities of inquiry. Borrowing from the world of science research literature, a workbench dialectic inquiry model was engaged in designing a small group-large group dynamic. Mimicking scientists at the workbench, the participants formed relationships in small groups to develop ideas about TPACK, presented their ideas to the larger, whole-class group, then returned to the small groups to integrate feedback. This dynamic group interaction structure provided the participants with the space to develop their TPACK thinking in ways that supported the transition to cognitive discourse. Analysis of the forum postings revealed the complexity of the participant interaction and suggested that facilitating student community engagement supported the development of their TPACK. Course design details are provided. Further research directions might include applying the workbench dialectic inquiry model in other educational contexts and with larger student populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging a Workbench Dialectic Inquiry Model in an Online Master's Degree Program Building Knowledge for Technology Integration in Learning to Teach Secondary School Mathematics The Practices of Learning Assessment in the Initial Teacher Training Creating Laboratories of Practice for Developing Preservice Elementary Teachers' TPACK The Development of Technology Integration in a Graduate Course for Practicing Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1