超越双重盲点:在当代史学中将共产主义妇女重新定位为跨性别主体

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Gender and History Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1111/1468-0424.12675
Victor Strazzeri
{"title":"超越双重盲点:在当代史学中将共产主义妇女重新定位为跨性别主体","authors":"Victor Strazzeri","doi":"10.1111/1468-0424.12675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article identifies a specific historiographical gap obfuscating communist women, namely, a ‘double blind spot’ rooted in the combined effect of the scant consideration of women in histories of communism and of communist activists in accounts of the women's movement. It traces this pattern of invisibilisation back to the paradigm of communist women's ‘instrumentalisation’ and to the resulting paradox of an ‘activism without agency’. The article then provides a critique of this received image; first, through an analysis of emerging scholarship on the female communist experience; second, through recourse to actors’ own perspective on the rapport between communism and feminism and the possibilities of ‘double militancy’, drawn from sources of the post-1968 Italian context. It closes with an argument for relocating communist women as an unexpectedly transgressive subject of twentieth-century history.</p>","PeriodicalId":46382,"journal":{"name":"Gender and History","volume":"36 2","pages":"755-774"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.12675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the double blind spot: Relocating communist women as transgressive subjects in contemporary historiography\",\"authors\":\"Victor Strazzeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0424.12675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article identifies a specific historiographical gap obfuscating communist women, namely, a ‘double blind spot’ rooted in the combined effect of the scant consideration of women in histories of communism and of communist activists in accounts of the women's movement. It traces this pattern of invisibilisation back to the paradigm of communist women's ‘instrumentalisation’ and to the resulting paradox of an ‘activism without agency’. The article then provides a critique of this received image; first, through an analysis of emerging scholarship on the female communist experience; second, through recourse to actors’ own perspective on the rapport between communism and feminism and the possibilities of ‘double militancy’, drawn from sources of the post-1968 Italian context. It closes with an argument for relocating communist women as an unexpectedly transgressive subject of twentieth-century history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and History\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"755-774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.12675\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.12675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.12675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章指出了混淆共产主义女性的特定史学空白,即 "双重盲点",其根源在于共产主义历史中很少考虑女性以及妇女运动史中很少考虑共产主义活动家。文章将这种隐蔽化模式追溯到共产主义妇女的 "工具化 "范式,以及由此产生的 "没有机构的行动主义 "悖论。随后,文章对这一形象进行了批判:首先,分析了新出现的有关女性共产主义经历的学术研究;其次,从 1968 年后意大利背景的资料中,借鉴了行动者自身对共产主义与女权主义之间关系的看法,以及 "双重激进主义 "的可能性。最后,该书论证了将共产主义女性重新定位为二十世纪历史中出人意料的越轨主体的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the double blind spot: Relocating communist women as transgressive subjects in contemporary historiography

This article identifies a specific historiographical gap obfuscating communist women, namely, a ‘double blind spot’ rooted in the combined effect of the scant consideration of women in histories of communism and of communist activists in accounts of the women's movement. It traces this pattern of invisibilisation back to the paradigm of communist women's ‘instrumentalisation’ and to the resulting paradox of an ‘activism without agency’. The article then provides a critique of this received image; first, through an analysis of emerging scholarship on the female communist experience; second, through recourse to actors’ own perspective on the rapport between communism and feminism and the possibilities of ‘double militancy’, drawn from sources of the post-1968 Italian context. It closes with an argument for relocating communist women as an unexpectedly transgressive subject of twentieth-century history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and History
Gender and History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Engendering carcerality: An introduction ‘Good fortune in the camps never lasted’: Gendered experience of carceral labour in the Soviet Union, 1930–1953 ‘No sword could ever pierce my heart more than when I must miss my child’: Power dynamics, agency and motherhood in the prison of ‘s-Hertogenbosch 1820–1880 The other women's rights movement: ‘Streetwalkers’, habeas corpus and anticarceral activism in New York City, 1830–1860
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1