大学生黑莓和苹果用户:定性对比分析

Michael W. Firmin, Hannah J. Holmes, Katlyn M. Orient, R. Firmin
{"title":"大学生黑莓和苹果用户:定性对比分析","authors":"Michael W. Firmin, Hannah J. Holmes, Katlyn M. Orient, R. Firmin","doi":"10.1504/IJIOME.2013.056003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study provides an analysis of college student BlackBerry and Apple users from three previously published qualitative research articles. The results were compared in order to show the contrasts, as well as some similarities, between students who use divergent PDA devices. In particular, we note five key differences that seem to demarcate the two groups, based on the qualitative interviews they shared regarding technology use. The differences became evident in the domains of motivation for purchase and continued use, desired outcomes from technology, brand loyalty, group connectedness, and social perceptions. Overall, the BlackBerry users described themselves mostly in utilitarian terms and Apple users framed their perceptions in light of valued cool/artistic elements. The results are discussed with respect to social psychology dynamics, the effects of advertising on consumers, and brand loyalty impacts.","PeriodicalId":193538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"College Student BlackBerry Versus Apple Users: A Qualitative-Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Michael W. Firmin, Hannah J. Holmes, Katlyn M. Orient, R. Firmin\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJIOME.2013.056003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study provides an analysis of college student BlackBerry and Apple users from three previously published qualitative research articles. The results were compared in order to show the contrasts, as well as some similarities, between students who use divergent PDA devices. In particular, we note five key differences that seem to demarcate the two groups, based on the qualitative interviews they shared regarding technology use. The differences became evident in the domains of motivation for purchase and continued use, desired outcomes from technology, brand loyalty, group connectedness, and social perceptions. Overall, the BlackBerry users described themselves mostly in utilitarian terms and Apple users framed their perceptions in light of valued cool/artistic elements. The results are discussed with respect to social psychology dynamics, the effects of advertising on consumers, and brand loyalty impacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIOME.2013.056003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIOME.2013.056003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究提供了一个大学生黑莓和苹果用户从三个以前发表的定性研究文章的分析。结果进行了比较,以显示使用不同PDA设备的学生之间的差异,以及一些相似之处。特别是,根据他们分享的关于技术使用的定性访谈,我们注意到两个群体之间的五个关键差异。在购买和继续使用的动机、技术的期望结果、品牌忠诚度、群体联系和社会认知等领域,差异变得明显。总的来说,黑莓用户大多用功利主义来描述自己,而苹果用户则根据他们看重的酷/艺术元素来定义自己的看法。研究结果从社会心理动力学、广告对消费者的影响以及品牌忠诚度的影响等方面进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
College Student BlackBerry Versus Apple Users: A Qualitative-Comparative Analysis
The present study provides an analysis of college student BlackBerry and Apple users from three previously published qualitative research articles. The results were compared in order to show the contrasts, as well as some similarities, between students who use divergent PDA devices. In particular, we note five key differences that seem to demarcate the two groups, based on the qualitative interviews they shared regarding technology use. The differences became evident in the domains of motivation for purchase and continued use, desired outcomes from technology, brand loyalty, group connectedness, and social perceptions. Overall, the BlackBerry users described themselves mostly in utilitarian terms and Apple users framed their perceptions in light of valued cool/artistic elements. The results are discussed with respect to social psychology dynamics, the effects of advertising on consumers, and brand loyalty impacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lean production teaching methods and learning assessment: a literature review A framework for teaching an undergraduate data analytics class An informal approach to management development at small and medium-sized manufacturing companies Computer self-efficacy in global contexts: appraising Chinese and Indian non-specialists' attitudes to common and advanced computer tasks Role of learning style preferences and interactive response systems on student learning outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1