{"title":"权为(1,n)的分级上下代数的Hochschild上同调","authors":"Ayako Itaba, Kenta Ueyama","doi":"10.1142/S0219498821501310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let $A=A(\\alpha, \\beta)$ be a graded down-up algebra with $({\\rm deg}\\,x, {\\rm deg}\\,y)=(1,n)$ and $\\beta \\neq 0$, and let $\\nabla A$ be the Beilinson algebra of $A$. If $n=1$, then a description of the Hochschild cohomology group of $\\nabla A$ is known. In this paper, we calculate the Hochschild cohomology group of $\\nabla A$ for the case $n \\geq 2$. As an application, we see that the structure of the bounded derived category of the noncommutative projective scheme of $A$ is different depending on whether $\\left(\\begin{smallmatrix} 1&0 \\end{smallmatrix}\\right)\\left(\\begin{smallmatrix} \\alpha &1 \\\\ \\beta &0 \\end{smallmatrix}\\right)^n\\left(\\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\\\ 0 \\end{smallmatrix}\\right)$ is zero or not. Moreover, it turns out that there is a difference between the cases $n=2$ and $n\\geq 3$ in the context of Grothendieck groups.","PeriodicalId":275006,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Representation Theory","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hochschild cohomology related to graded down-up algebras with weights (1,n)\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Itaba, Kenta Ueyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0219498821501310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Let $A=A(\\\\alpha, \\\\beta)$ be a graded down-up algebra with $({\\\\rm deg}\\\\,x, {\\\\rm deg}\\\\,y)=(1,n)$ and $\\\\beta \\\\neq 0$, and let $\\\\nabla A$ be the Beilinson algebra of $A$. If $n=1$, then a description of the Hochschild cohomology group of $\\\\nabla A$ is known. In this paper, we calculate the Hochschild cohomology group of $\\\\nabla A$ for the case $n \\\\geq 2$. As an application, we see that the structure of the bounded derived category of the noncommutative projective scheme of $A$ is different depending on whether $\\\\left(\\\\begin{smallmatrix} 1&0 \\\\end{smallmatrix}\\\\right)\\\\left(\\\\begin{smallmatrix} \\\\alpha &1 \\\\\\\\ \\\\beta &0 \\\\end{smallmatrix}\\\\right)^n\\\\left(\\\\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\\\\\\\ 0 \\\\end{smallmatrix}\\\\right)$ is zero or not. Moreover, it turns out that there is a difference between the cases $n=2$ and $n\\\\geq 3$ in the context of Grothendieck groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Representation Theory\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Representation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498821501310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Representation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498821501310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hochschild cohomology related to graded down-up algebras with weights (1,n)
Let $A=A(\alpha, \beta)$ be a graded down-up algebra with $({\rm deg}\,x, {\rm deg}\,y)=(1,n)$ and $\beta \neq 0$, and let $\nabla A$ be the Beilinson algebra of $A$. If $n=1$, then a description of the Hochschild cohomology group of $\nabla A$ is known. In this paper, we calculate the Hochschild cohomology group of $\nabla A$ for the case $n \geq 2$. As an application, we see that the structure of the bounded derived category of the noncommutative projective scheme of $A$ is different depending on whether $\left(\begin{smallmatrix} 1&0 \end{smallmatrix}\right)\left(\begin{smallmatrix} \alpha &1 \\ \beta &0 \end{smallmatrix}\right)^n\left(\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{smallmatrix}\right)$ is zero or not. Moreover, it turns out that there is a difference between the cases $n=2$ and $n\geq 3$ in the context of Grothendieck groups.