Omar Almomani, Adeeb Saaidah, Firas Al Balas, L. Al-Qaisi
{"title":"基于仿真的几种计算机网络主动队列管理算法性能评价","authors":"Omar Almomani, Adeeb Saaidah, Firas Al Balas, L. Al-Qaisi","doi":"10.1109/IACS.2019.8809117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congestion crumbles the network performance, therefore. This paper evaluates several Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms which used to control congestion. The main Objective of the paper is to find optimal algorithm that can be use to avoid congestion. AQM are router based mechanism which can detect congestion in early stage in the network ask the transmitter to decrease its transmitting rate, in this way the network can control the congestion for incoming packets. So some of AQM algorithms were evaluated by analyzed their performance, the selected AQM algorithms are Gentle BLUE (GB), Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED), Effective Random Early Detection (ERED), BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold algorithms. Performance evaluation is carried by using JAVA simulation environments. Evaluation results show that GB compared with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold outperformed in terms of mean queue length, delay and packet loss. GB had maximum dropping probability as compare with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold. In term of throughput all tested algorithms all most give same throughput. The results prove that the GB is can be appropriate algorithm to handle congestion as compare to DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold.","PeriodicalId":225697,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation Based Performance Evaluation of Several Active Queue Management Algorithms for Computer Network\",\"authors\":\"Omar Almomani, Adeeb Saaidah, Firas Al Balas, L. Al-Qaisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IACS.2019.8809117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Congestion crumbles the network performance, therefore. This paper evaluates several Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms which used to control congestion. The main Objective of the paper is to find optimal algorithm that can be use to avoid congestion. AQM are router based mechanism which can detect congestion in early stage in the network ask the transmitter to decrease its transmitting rate, in this way the network can control the congestion for incoming packets. So some of AQM algorithms were evaluated by analyzed their performance, the selected AQM algorithms are Gentle BLUE (GB), Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED), Effective Random Early Detection (ERED), BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold algorithms. Performance evaluation is carried by using JAVA simulation environments. Evaluation results show that GB compared with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold outperformed in terms of mean queue length, delay and packet loss. GB had maximum dropping probability as compare with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold. In term of throughput all tested algorithms all most give same throughput. The results prove that the GB is can be appropriate algorithm to handle congestion as compare to DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold.\",\"PeriodicalId\":225697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2019.8809117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2019.8809117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
因此,拥塞会降低网络性能。本文评价了几种用于控制拥塞的主动队列管理(AQM)算法。本文的主要目标是找到可用于避免拥塞的最优算法。AQM是一种基于路由器的机制,它可以在网络的早期检测到拥塞,要求发送方降低传输速率,从而控制传入数据包的拥塞。本文通过对几种AQM算法的性能分析,对几种AQM算法进行了评价,选取的AQM算法有:Gentle BLUE (GB)算法、Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED)算法、Effective Random Early Detection (ERED)算法、BLUE算法和Adaptive Max Threshold算法。利用JAVA仿真环境进行性能评估。评估结果表明,与DGRED、ERED、BLUE和Adaptive Max Threshold算法相比,GB算法在平均队列长度、延迟和丢包方面表现优于DGRED算法。与DGRED、ERED、BLUE和Adaptive Max Threshold相比,GB具有最大的掉落概率。在吞吐量方面,所有被测试的算法都给出了相同的吞吐量。结果表明,与DGRED、ERED、BLUE和Adaptive Max Threshold算法相比,GB is算法是一种较好的拥塞处理算法。
Simulation Based Performance Evaluation of Several Active Queue Management Algorithms for Computer Network
Congestion crumbles the network performance, therefore. This paper evaluates several Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms which used to control congestion. The main Objective of the paper is to find optimal algorithm that can be use to avoid congestion. AQM are router based mechanism which can detect congestion in early stage in the network ask the transmitter to decrease its transmitting rate, in this way the network can control the congestion for incoming packets. So some of AQM algorithms were evaluated by analyzed their performance, the selected AQM algorithms are Gentle BLUE (GB), Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED), Effective Random Early Detection (ERED), BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold algorithms. Performance evaluation is carried by using JAVA simulation environments. Evaluation results show that GB compared with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold outperformed in terms of mean queue length, delay and packet loss. GB had maximum dropping probability as compare with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold. In term of throughput all tested algorithms all most give same throughput. The results prove that the GB is can be appropriate algorithm to handle congestion as compare to DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold.