面向最优需求优选技术的比较分析

Hanny Tufail, Iqra Qasim, M. Masood, Sara Tanvir, Wasi Haider Butt
{"title":"面向最优需求优选技术的比较分析","authors":"Hanny Tufail, Iqra Qasim, M. Masood, Sara Tanvir, Wasi Haider Butt","doi":"10.1109/INFOMAN.2019.8714709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirement Prioritization (RP) bears a sheer significance in requirements engineering. It is deployed to rank the requirements for subsequent release in their respective order based on predefined criteria. Software systems primarily get more complex accompanying size of requirements. In most cases, it is not possible to consider all requirements due to limited time and resources. Thus, requirements need to be prioritized correctly according to their importance. Quality of software to be developed greatly depends upon the order of requirements. Many studies reveal, no single RP technique can be labeled as best for all applications. Hence there is a need to analyze the available RP techniques to identify most favorable one in a given context. In this paper, a comparative analysis of ten leading RP techniques have been performed, based on some key factors like RP scales, complexity, scalability, customizability, accuracy, suitable dataset and handling risk factor. Strengths and weaknesses of these techniques have been analyzed and discussed. A case study is also incorporated as an example of selection of most suitable RP technique. This study contributes in selection of most appropriate RP technique in a particular scenario.","PeriodicalId":186072,"journal":{"name":"2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the selection of Optimum Requirements Prioritization Technique: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hanny Tufail, Iqra Qasim, M. Masood, Sara Tanvir, Wasi Haider Butt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFOMAN.2019.8714709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Requirement Prioritization (RP) bears a sheer significance in requirements engineering. It is deployed to rank the requirements for subsequent release in their respective order based on predefined criteria. Software systems primarily get more complex accompanying size of requirements. In most cases, it is not possible to consider all requirements due to limited time and resources. Thus, requirements need to be prioritized correctly according to their importance. Quality of software to be developed greatly depends upon the order of requirements. Many studies reveal, no single RP technique can be labeled as best for all applications. Hence there is a need to analyze the available RP techniques to identify most favorable one in a given context. In this paper, a comparative analysis of ten leading RP techniques have been performed, based on some key factors like RP scales, complexity, scalability, customizability, accuracy, suitable dataset and handling risk factor. Strengths and weaknesses of these techniques have been analyzed and discussed. A case study is also incorporated as an example of selection of most suitable RP technique. This study contributes in selection of most appropriate RP technique in a particular scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOMAN.2019.8714709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOMAN.2019.8714709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

需求优先级(RP)在需求工程中具有绝对的重要性。部署它是为了根据预定义的标准对后续版本的需求按照各自的顺序进行排序。软件系统主要是随着需求的增加而变得更加复杂。在大多数情况下,由于时间和资源的限制,不可能考虑所有的需求。因此,需要根据需求的重要性对其进行正确的优先级排序。要开发的软件的质量在很大程度上取决于需求的顺序。许多研究表明,没有单一的RP技术可以标记为最好的所有应用。因此,有必要分析可用的RP技术,以确定在给定环境中最有利的技术。本文从RP的规模、复杂性、可扩展性、可定制性、准确性、合适的数据集和处理风险因素等关键因素对十种领先的RP技术进行了比较分析。对这些技术的优缺点进行了分析和讨论。一个案例研究也被纳入作为选择最合适的RP技术的例子。本研究有助于在特定情况下选择最合适的RP技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards the selection of Optimum Requirements Prioritization Technique: A Comparative Analysis
Requirement Prioritization (RP) bears a sheer significance in requirements engineering. It is deployed to rank the requirements for subsequent release in their respective order based on predefined criteria. Software systems primarily get more complex accompanying size of requirements. In most cases, it is not possible to consider all requirements due to limited time and resources. Thus, requirements need to be prioritized correctly according to their importance. Quality of software to be developed greatly depends upon the order of requirements. Many studies reveal, no single RP technique can be labeled as best for all applications. Hence there is a need to analyze the available RP techniques to identify most favorable one in a given context. In this paper, a comparative analysis of ten leading RP techniques have been performed, based on some key factors like RP scales, complexity, scalability, customizability, accuracy, suitable dataset and handling risk factor. Strengths and weaknesses of these techniques have been analyzed and discussed. A case study is also incorporated as an example of selection of most suitable RP technique. This study contributes in selection of most appropriate RP technique in a particular scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Commpetence Curriculum for Schools' Employees: Croatian e-Schools Project Example Designing of the Entrepreneurial Phase Cycle Simulation Model: Justification and Prospects Literature Review of WeChat Friends Circle Advertisement Analysis of Research on Online Rumors A Framework for Improving the Sharing of Teaching Practices Through Web 2.0 Technology for Academic Instructors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1