F. Porras, Angel D. Ramirez, A. Walter, Guillermo Soriano
{"title":"温室气体排放的生命周期评估:厄瓜多尔空调应用冷却塔和地热热交换器的比较","authors":"F. Porras, Angel D. Ramirez, A. Walter, Guillermo Soriano","doi":"10.1115/es2019-3907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cooling towers are widely used to remove heat in buildings with chilled water air conditioning systems. Moreira et al. [1] performed an experimental comparison between a cooling tower (CT) and a geothermal heat exchanger (GHE) in Guayaquil-Ecuador (hot/humid climate) and the results show an advantage of 39% of GHE systems regarding energy efficiency.\n This study compares the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), considering the results of the research mentioned above and comparing both systems. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to estimate the GHG emissions, assuming three scenarios for the electricity supply: the electricity generation mix in 2016, the planned electricity generation mix in 2025, and the profile for marginal electricity generation (peak demand).\n The estimated reduction of GHG emissions due to the use of GHE systems could be up to 50%. GHEs for building air conditioning applications is a technological option with potential to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions. However, additional work is necessary to evaluate the complete environmental profile and its cost-effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":219138,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Comparison Between a Cooling Tower and a Geothermal Heat Exchanger for Air Conditioning Applications in Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"F. Porras, Angel D. Ramirez, A. Walter, Guillermo Soriano\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/es2019-3907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Cooling towers are widely used to remove heat in buildings with chilled water air conditioning systems. Moreira et al. [1] performed an experimental comparison between a cooling tower (CT) and a geothermal heat exchanger (GHE) in Guayaquil-Ecuador (hot/humid climate) and the results show an advantage of 39% of GHE systems regarding energy efficiency.\\n This study compares the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), considering the results of the research mentioned above and comparing both systems. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to estimate the GHG emissions, assuming three scenarios for the electricity supply: the electricity generation mix in 2016, the planned electricity generation mix in 2025, and the profile for marginal electricity generation (peak demand).\\n The estimated reduction of GHG emissions due to the use of GHE systems could be up to 50%. GHEs for building air conditioning applications is a technological option with potential to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions. However, additional work is necessary to evaluate the complete environmental profile and its cost-effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2019-3907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2019-3907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Comparison Between a Cooling Tower and a Geothermal Heat Exchanger for Air Conditioning Applications in Ecuador
Cooling towers are widely used to remove heat in buildings with chilled water air conditioning systems. Moreira et al. [1] performed an experimental comparison between a cooling tower (CT) and a geothermal heat exchanger (GHE) in Guayaquil-Ecuador (hot/humid climate) and the results show an advantage of 39% of GHE systems regarding energy efficiency.
This study compares the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), considering the results of the research mentioned above and comparing both systems. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to estimate the GHG emissions, assuming three scenarios for the electricity supply: the electricity generation mix in 2016, the planned electricity generation mix in 2025, and the profile for marginal electricity generation (peak demand).
The estimated reduction of GHG emissions due to the use of GHE systems could be up to 50%. GHEs for building air conditioning applications is a technological option with potential to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions. However, additional work is necessary to evaluate the complete environmental profile and its cost-effectiveness.