使用个性化和实施意图增加电子卫生干预的参与

Camryn Burley, Darby Anderson, Amanda Brownlee, Georgie Lafer, Taylor Luong, Meaghan McGowan, Judy Nguyen, William Trotter, Halle Wine, Anna N. Baglione, Laura E. Barnes
{"title":"使用个性化和实施意图增加电子卫生干预的参与","authors":"Camryn Burley, Darby Anderson, Amanda Brownlee, Georgie Lafer, Taylor Luong, Meaghan McGowan, Judy Nguyen, William Trotter, Halle Wine, Anna N. Baglione, Laura E. Barnes","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately one in five adults in the United States have been diagnosed with some form of mental illness, but less than half received treatment in this past year [1]. An interdisciplinary team at the University of Virginia aims to reduce this gap in mental health coverage through its freely accessible online research platform, the MindTrails Project. The MindTrails Calm Thinking study evaluates cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I), an intervention that aims to reframe the thinking patterns of highly anxious individuals when they respond to ambiguous situations that they might interpret as stressful. MindTrails is experiencing a high attrition (dropout) rate, which is common to eHealth interventions. In response to this, our project utilized two novel approaches to online anxiety interventions to improve engagement and retention: (1) personalization of training content and (2) implementation intentions and goal setting. We designed a prototype for a new mobile interface that engages users with a journal to record implementation intentions and goals. Users also have the ability to choose the domain of anxiety (e.g., relationships, health) that they would like to work on. To further incorporate these psychological principles into the MindTrails program, suggestions for future work are also discussed. We hypothesize that, with its new user-centered mobile interface, the Calm Thinking mobile application will further connect users with an evidence-based mental health intervention and increase the efficacy of the program.","PeriodicalId":331495,"journal":{"name":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Engagement in eHealth Interventions Using Personalization and Implementation Intentions\",\"authors\":\"Camryn Burley, Darby Anderson, Amanda Brownlee, Georgie Lafer, Taylor Luong, Meaghan McGowan, Judy Nguyen, William Trotter, Halle Wine, Anna N. Baglione, Laura E. Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Approximately one in five adults in the United States have been diagnosed with some form of mental illness, but less than half received treatment in this past year [1]. An interdisciplinary team at the University of Virginia aims to reduce this gap in mental health coverage through its freely accessible online research platform, the MindTrails Project. The MindTrails Calm Thinking study evaluates cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I), an intervention that aims to reframe the thinking patterns of highly anxious individuals when they respond to ambiguous situations that they might interpret as stressful. MindTrails is experiencing a high attrition (dropout) rate, which is common to eHealth interventions. In response to this, our project utilized two novel approaches to online anxiety interventions to improve engagement and retention: (1) personalization of training content and (2) implementation intentions and goal setting. We designed a prototype for a new mobile interface that engages users with a journal to record implementation intentions and goals. Users also have the ability to choose the domain of anxiety (e.g., relationships, health) that they would like to work on. To further incorporate these psychological principles into the MindTrails program, suggestions for future work are also discussed. We hypothesize that, with its new user-centered mobile interface, the Calm Thinking mobile application will further connect users with an evidence-based mental health intervention and increase the efficacy of the program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在美国,大约五分之一的成年人被诊断出患有某种形式的精神疾病,但在过去的一年中,接受治疗的不到一半[1]。弗吉尼亚大学(University of Virginia)的一个跨学科团队旨在通过其免费访问的在线研究平台MindTrails Project,缩小心理健康覆盖方面的差距。MindTrails Calm Thinking研究评估了认知偏差修正解释(CBM-I),这是一种干预措施,旨在重新构建高度焦虑的个体在他们可能将其解释为压力的模糊情况下的思维模式。MindTrails正在经历高流失率,这在电子健康干预中很常见。针对这一点,我们的项目采用了两种新颖的在线焦虑干预方法来提高参与度和留存率:(1)个性化培训内容;(2)实施意图和目标设定。我们为新的移动界面设计了一个原型,让用户通过日志记录执行意图和目标。用户还可以选择他们想要处理的焦虑领域(例如,人际关系、健康)。为了进一步将这些心理学原理纳入MindTrails计划,还讨论了对未来工作的建议。我们假设,通过其新的以用户为中心的移动界面,Calm Thinking移动应用程序将进一步将用户与基于证据的心理健康干预联系起来,并提高程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increasing Engagement in eHealth Interventions Using Personalization and Implementation Intentions
Approximately one in five adults in the United States have been diagnosed with some form of mental illness, but less than half received treatment in this past year [1]. An interdisciplinary team at the University of Virginia aims to reduce this gap in mental health coverage through its freely accessible online research platform, the MindTrails Project. The MindTrails Calm Thinking study evaluates cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I), an intervention that aims to reframe the thinking patterns of highly anxious individuals when they respond to ambiguous situations that they might interpret as stressful. MindTrails is experiencing a high attrition (dropout) rate, which is common to eHealth interventions. In response to this, our project utilized two novel approaches to online anxiety interventions to improve engagement and retention: (1) personalization of training content and (2) implementation intentions and goal setting. We designed a prototype for a new mobile interface that engages users with a journal to record implementation intentions and goals. Users also have the ability to choose the domain of anxiety (e.g., relationships, health) that they would like to work on. To further incorporate these psychological principles into the MindTrails program, suggestions for future work are also discussed. We hypothesize that, with its new user-centered mobile interface, the Calm Thinking mobile application will further connect users with an evidence-based mental health intervention and increase the efficacy of the program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Automation Bias and Complacency in an X-Ray Screening Task Criminal Consistency and Distinctiveness Evaluating and Improving Attrition Models for the Retail Banking Industry SIEDS 2020 TOC Automated Rotor Assembly CNC Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1