Hugo Consciência Silvestre , João Ricardo Catarino , Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araújo
{"title":"公共服务提供中合作生产的证据:葡萄牙行政仲裁中心的案例","authors":"Hugo Consciência Silvestre , João Ricardo Catarino , Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araújo","doi":"10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, <em>is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why?</em> In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30471,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 355-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Consciência Silvestre , João Ricardo Catarino , Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, <em>is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why?</em> In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 355-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0080210716301790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0080210716301790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why? In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.