MiFID, Reg NMS和欧洲和美国交易场所的竞争

Giovanni Petrella
{"title":"MiFID, Reg NMS和欧洲和美国交易场所的竞争","authors":"Giovanni Petrella","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1442874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the differences between MiFID and Reg NMS and provides, based on market microstructure principles, insights as to their likely impact on European and US securities markets. Although MiFID and Reg NMS share the common objective of enhancing competition in securities markets, they adopt different provisions with respect to three issues that strongly influence the competition for order flow among trading venues. Specifically, some of the provisions set forth by the US regulation with respect to the best execution duty, the consolidation of market data and the disclosure of execution quality information appear to be more effective, compared to the EU ones, in strengthening competition for order flow among trading venues. The paper also provides an investigation of the degree of market fragmentation among incumbent exchanges and new trading venues in European and US securities markets, and suggests possible explanations for understanding the current macrostructure of such markets.","PeriodicalId":417524,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MiFID, Reg NMS and Competition Across Trading Venues in Europe and United States\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Petrella\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1442874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the differences between MiFID and Reg NMS and provides, based on market microstructure principles, insights as to their likely impact on European and US securities markets. Although MiFID and Reg NMS share the common objective of enhancing competition in securities markets, they adopt different provisions with respect to three issues that strongly influence the competition for order flow among trading venues. Specifically, some of the provisions set forth by the US regulation with respect to the best execution duty, the consolidation of market data and the disclosure of execution quality information appear to be more effective, compared to the EU ones, in strengthening competition for order flow among trading venues. The paper also provides an investigation of the degree of market fragmentation among incumbent exchanges and new trading venues in European and US securities markets, and suggests possible explanations for understanding the current macrostructure of such markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1442874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1442874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本文考察了MiFID和Reg NMS之间的差异,并根据市场微观结构原则,提供了它们对欧洲和美国证券市场可能影响的见解。尽管MiFID和Reg NMS的共同目标是加强证券市场的竞争,但它们在三个问题上采用了不同的规定,这些问题强烈影响交易场所之间的订单流竞争。具体而言,与欧盟相比,美国监管机构在最佳执行义务、市场数据整合和执行质量信息披露等方面的一些规定似乎更有效地加强了交易场所之间对订单流的竞争。本文还对欧洲和美国证券市场现有交易所和新交易场所之间的市场碎片化程度进行了调查,并提出了理解这些市场当前宏观结构的可能解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MiFID, Reg NMS and Competition Across Trading Venues in Europe and United States
This paper examines the differences between MiFID and Reg NMS and provides, based on market microstructure principles, insights as to their likely impact on European and US securities markets. Although MiFID and Reg NMS share the common objective of enhancing competition in securities markets, they adopt different provisions with respect to three issues that strongly influence the competition for order flow among trading venues. Specifically, some of the provisions set forth by the US regulation with respect to the best execution duty, the consolidation of market data and the disclosure of execution quality information appear to be more effective, compared to the EU ones, in strengthening competition for order flow among trading venues. The paper also provides an investigation of the degree of market fragmentation among incumbent exchanges and new trading venues in European and US securities markets, and suggests possible explanations for understanding the current macrostructure of such markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technological Capacity and Firms' Recovery from COVID-19 Gender and Firm Performance around the World: The Roles of Finance, Technology, and Labor Does Foreign Investment Raise Firm Innovation? Islamic Financing Initiatives Stimulating SMEs Creation in Muslim Countries Government Subsidy Dependence and Stock Price Crash Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1