MBA课程声誉和定量排名:为学生、雇主和项目管理者提供的新信息

Yongil Jeon, S. Miller, S. Ray
{"title":"MBA课程声誉和定量排名:为学生、雇主和项目管理者提供的新信息","authors":"Yongil Jeon, S. Miller, S. Ray","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1006297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1988, Business Week biennially ranks MBA programs based on qualitative (\"subjective\") surveys of students and employers. The Business Week ranking, and similar rankings, based on perceptions of MBA-program customers, rings the alarm that image, rather than substance, may become the raison d'etre of MBA-program evaluation and selection. We rank MBA programs using the quantitative (\"objective\") data collected with the 2004 Business Week survey, attempting to address these concerns about image over substance. We employ equal-weighted and principal components indexes to rank MBA programs. Our indexes fall into three categories - output, input, and output-input indexes - that rank MBA programs proximately from the interests of students, employers, and MBA program administrators, respectively.","PeriodicalId":446975,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Survey Methods (Topic)","volume":"124 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MBA Program Reputation and Quantitative Rankings: New Information for Students, Employers, and Program Administrators\",\"authors\":\"Yongil Jeon, S. Miller, S. Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1006297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 1988, Business Week biennially ranks MBA programs based on qualitative (\\\"subjective\\\") surveys of students and employers. The Business Week ranking, and similar rankings, based on perceptions of MBA-program customers, rings the alarm that image, rather than substance, may become the raison d'etre of MBA-program evaluation and selection. We rank MBA programs using the quantitative (\\\"objective\\\") data collected with the 2004 Business Week survey, attempting to address these concerns about image over substance. We employ equal-weighted and principal components indexes to rank MBA programs. Our indexes fall into three categories - output, input, and output-input indexes - that rank MBA programs proximately from the interests of students, employers, and MBA program administrators, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Survey Methods (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"124 Pt 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Survey Methods (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1006297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Survey Methods (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1006297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自1988年以来,《商业周刊》每两年根据对学生和雇主的定性(“主观”)调查对MBA课程进行排名。《商业周刊》的排名,以及类似的排名,都是基于mba课程客户的看法,敲响了警钟:形象,而不是实质,可能成为mba课程评估和选择的理由。我们利用2004年《商业周刊》调查收集的定量(“客观”)数据对MBA课程进行排名,试图解决形象重于实质的问题。我们采用等权重指数和主成分指数对MBA项目进行排名。我们的指数分为三类——产出、投入和产出-投入指数——分别根据学生、雇主和MBA项目管理者的兴趣对MBA项目进行排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MBA Program Reputation and Quantitative Rankings: New Information for Students, Employers, and Program Administrators
Since 1988, Business Week biennially ranks MBA programs based on qualitative ("subjective") surveys of students and employers. The Business Week ranking, and similar rankings, based on perceptions of MBA-program customers, rings the alarm that image, rather than substance, may become the raison d'etre of MBA-program evaluation and selection. We rank MBA programs using the quantitative ("objective") data collected with the 2004 Business Week survey, attempting to address these concerns about image over substance. We employ equal-weighted and principal components indexes to rank MBA programs. Our indexes fall into three categories - output, input, and output-input indexes - that rank MBA programs proximately from the interests of students, employers, and MBA program administrators, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Survey module to measure ambiguity preferences: Module and ambiguity preference score Dissemination of the Survey Methodology from a Practical Point of View A Survey of Data Pricing Methods Peer Effects in Networks: A Survey Public Opinion and Black NFL Players After the National Anthem Protests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1