隐私权和数据安全:GDPR和个人数据驱动市场

T. Ke, K. Sudhir
{"title":"隐私权和数据安全:GDPR和个人数据驱动市场","authors":"T. Ke, K. Sudhir","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3643979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates how the two key features of GDPR (EU’s data protection regulation)— privacy rights and data security—impact personal data driven markets. First, GDPR recognizes that individuals own and control their data in perpetuity, leading to three critical privacy rights: (i) right to explicit consent (data opt-in), (ii) right to be forgotten (data erasure), and (iii) right to portability (switch data to competitor). Second, GDPR has data security mandates protection against privacy breaches through unauthorized access. The right to explicit opt-in allows goods exchange without data exchange. Erasure and portability rights discipline firms to provide ongoing value and reduces consumers’ holdup using their own data. Overall, privacy rights restrict legal collection and use, while data security protects against illegal access and use. We develop a two- period model of forward-looking firms and consumers where consumers exercise data privacy rights balancing the cost (privacy breach, price discrimination) and benefits (product personalization, price subsidies) of sharing data with firms. We find that by reducing expected privacy breach costs, data security mandates increase opt-in, consumer surplus and firm profit. Privacy rights reduce opt-in and mostly increase consumer surplus at the expense of firm profits; interestingly they hurt firms more in competitive than in monopolistic markets. While privacy rights can reduce surplus for both firms and consumers, these conditions are unlikely to be realized when breach risk is endogenized. Further, by unbundling data exchange from goods exchange, privacy rights facilitate trade in goods that may otherwise fail to occur due to privacy breach risk.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"4 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets\",\"authors\":\"T. Ke, K. Sudhir\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3643979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper investigates how the two key features of GDPR (EU’s data protection regulation)— privacy rights and data security—impact personal data driven markets. First, GDPR recognizes that individuals own and control their data in perpetuity, leading to three critical privacy rights: (i) right to explicit consent (data opt-in), (ii) right to be forgotten (data erasure), and (iii) right to portability (switch data to competitor). Second, GDPR has data security mandates protection against privacy breaches through unauthorized access. The right to explicit opt-in allows goods exchange without data exchange. Erasure and portability rights discipline firms to provide ongoing value and reduces consumers’ holdup using their own data. Overall, privacy rights restrict legal collection and use, while data security protects against illegal access and use. We develop a two- period model of forward-looking firms and consumers where consumers exercise data privacy rights balancing the cost (privacy breach, price discrimination) and benefits (product personalization, price subsidies) of sharing data with firms. We find that by reducing expected privacy breach costs, data security mandates increase opt-in, consumer surplus and firm profit. Privacy rights reduce opt-in and mostly increase consumer surplus at the expense of firm profits; interestingly they hurt firms more in competitive than in monopolistic markets. While privacy rights can reduce surplus for both firms and consumers, these conditions are unlikely to be realized when breach risk is endogenized. Further, by unbundling data exchange from goods exchange, privacy rights facilitate trade in goods that may otherwise fail to occur due to privacy breach risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"4 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3643979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3643979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本文研究了GDPR(欧盟数据保护条例)的两个关键特征——隐私权和数据安全——如何影响个人数据驱动的市场。首先,GDPR承认个人永久拥有和控制其数据,从而产生三个关键的隐私权:(i)明确同意权(数据选择加入),(ii)被遗忘权(数据删除)和(iii)可移植性权(将数据切换到竞争对手)。其次,GDPR有数据安全授权,防止未经授权的访问造成隐私泄露。明确的选择加入权允许商品交换而不交换数据。擦除和可移植性权利要求公司提供持续的价值,并减少消费者使用自己的数据的拖延。总的来说,隐私权限制合法的收集和使用,而数据安全则防止非法访问和使用。我们开发了一个前瞻性企业和消费者的两期模型,其中消费者行使数据隐私权,平衡与企业共享数据的成本(隐私泄露、价格歧视)和收益(产品个性化、价格补贴)。我们发现,通过降低预期的隐私泄露成本,数据安全授权增加了选择、消费者剩余和企业利润。隐私权减少了用户的选择,以牺牲企业利润为代价增加了消费者剩余;有趣的是,它们在竞争市场中对企业的伤害比在垄断市场中更大。虽然隐私权可以减少企业和消费者的剩余,但当违约风险内部化时,这些条件不太可能实现。此外,通过将数据交换与货物交换分离,隐私权促进了由于隐私泄露风险而无法进行的货物贸易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets
The paper investigates how the two key features of GDPR (EU’s data protection regulation)— privacy rights and data security—impact personal data driven markets. First, GDPR recognizes that individuals own and control their data in perpetuity, leading to three critical privacy rights: (i) right to explicit consent (data opt-in), (ii) right to be forgotten (data erasure), and (iii) right to portability (switch data to competitor). Second, GDPR has data security mandates protection against privacy breaches through unauthorized access. The right to explicit opt-in allows goods exchange without data exchange. Erasure and portability rights discipline firms to provide ongoing value and reduces consumers’ holdup using their own data. Overall, privacy rights restrict legal collection and use, while data security protects against illegal access and use. We develop a two- period model of forward-looking firms and consumers where consumers exercise data privacy rights balancing the cost (privacy breach, price discrimination) and benefits (product personalization, price subsidies) of sharing data with firms. We find that by reducing expected privacy breach costs, data security mandates increase opt-in, consumer surplus and firm profit. Privacy rights reduce opt-in and mostly increase consumer surplus at the expense of firm profits; interestingly they hurt firms more in competitive than in monopolistic markets. While privacy rights can reduce surplus for both firms and consumers, these conditions are unlikely to be realized when breach risk is endogenized. Further, by unbundling data exchange from goods exchange, privacy rights facilitate trade in goods that may otherwise fail to occur due to privacy breach risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1