柬埔寨农村生计战略:来自上丁省家庭调查的证据

D. Bühler, U. Grote, R. Hartje, Bopha Ker, D. T. Lam, L. Nguyen, Trung-Thanh Nguyen, Kimsun Tong
{"title":"柬埔寨农村生计战略:来自上丁省家庭调查的证据","authors":"D. Bühler, U. Grote, R. Hartje, Bopha Ker, D. T. Lam, L. Nguyen, Trung-Thanh Nguyen, Kimsun Tong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2583770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall objective of this discussion paper is to advance the knowledge on rural livelihoods in Stung Treng, Cambodia. In a cluster analysis, five clusters with very different livelihood strategies are identified based on a sample of 600 rural households. Despite the fact that nearly all households are engaged in some form of subsistence farming, especially by growing rice, the richer clusters build on self-employment and higher-skilled wage employment. In contrast the middle income cluster mainly depends on natural resources (fish and firewood). The poorer two clusters are engaged in lowerskilled wage employment. The incidence of poverty is widespread but differences between the clusters are clearly visible. Even the better-off households have consumption poverty headcount ratios of between 37 to 50% at PPP $1.25. For households from the poorest clusters the poverty headcount ratio amounts to even 70% for income and 80% for consumption. Especially the households largely depending on natural resource extraction are characterized by a high incidence of poverty and high vulnerability. In addition, there are a number of pressures which are expected to increase poverty problems in the future. Policies aimed at reducing poverty and improving rural livelihoods need to carefully consider the close linkages between rural livelihoods and natural resources. But also a diversification away from natural resource extraction into higher-skilled jobs is found to be a strategy opening up new opportunities to improve livelihood security and raise the living standards of the poor.","PeriodicalId":296234,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural Livelihood Strategies in Cambodia: Evidence from a Household Survey in Stung Treng\",\"authors\":\"D. Bühler, U. Grote, R. Hartje, Bopha Ker, D. T. Lam, L. Nguyen, Trung-Thanh Nguyen, Kimsun Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2583770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overall objective of this discussion paper is to advance the knowledge on rural livelihoods in Stung Treng, Cambodia. In a cluster analysis, five clusters with very different livelihood strategies are identified based on a sample of 600 rural households. Despite the fact that nearly all households are engaged in some form of subsistence farming, especially by growing rice, the richer clusters build on self-employment and higher-skilled wage employment. In contrast the middle income cluster mainly depends on natural resources (fish and firewood). The poorer two clusters are engaged in lowerskilled wage employment. The incidence of poverty is widespread but differences between the clusters are clearly visible. Even the better-off households have consumption poverty headcount ratios of between 37 to 50% at PPP $1.25. For households from the poorest clusters the poverty headcount ratio amounts to even 70% for income and 80% for consumption. Especially the households largely depending on natural resource extraction are characterized by a high incidence of poverty and high vulnerability. In addition, there are a number of pressures which are expected to increase poverty problems in the future. Policies aimed at reducing poverty and improving rural livelihoods need to carefully consider the close linkages between rural livelihoods and natural resources. But also a diversification away from natural resource extraction into higher-skilled jobs is found to be a strategy opening up new opportunities to improve livelihood security and raise the living standards of the poor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2583770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2583770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

本讨论文件的总体目标是促进对柬埔寨上丁农村生计的了解。在聚类分析中,根据600个农村家庭的样本,确定了五个具有非常不同生计战略的聚类。尽管几乎所有家庭都从事某种形式的自给农业,特别是种植水稻,但较富裕的集群建立在自营职业和高技能工资就业的基础上。相比之下,中等收入群体主要依赖自然资源(鱼和柴火)。较贫穷的两个群体从事低技能工资的工作。贫穷的发生率很普遍,但不同类别之间的差异也很明显。即使是较富裕的家庭,按1.25美元的购买力平价计算,其消费贫困人口比率也在37%至50%之间。对于来自最贫困集群的家庭,贫困人口比例在收入方面甚至达到70%,在消费方面达到80%。特别是在很大程度上依赖自然资源开采的家庭,其特点是贫困率高,脆弱性高。此外,还有一些压力,预计将来会增加贫穷问题。旨在减少贫困和改善农村生计的政策需要仔细考虑农村生计与自然资源之间的密切联系。但也发现,从自然资源开采转向高技能工作的多样化是一种战略,为改善生计保障和提高穷人的生活水平开辟了新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural Livelihood Strategies in Cambodia: Evidence from a Household Survey in Stung Treng
The overall objective of this discussion paper is to advance the knowledge on rural livelihoods in Stung Treng, Cambodia. In a cluster analysis, five clusters with very different livelihood strategies are identified based on a sample of 600 rural households. Despite the fact that nearly all households are engaged in some form of subsistence farming, especially by growing rice, the richer clusters build on self-employment and higher-skilled wage employment. In contrast the middle income cluster mainly depends on natural resources (fish and firewood). The poorer two clusters are engaged in lowerskilled wage employment. The incidence of poverty is widespread but differences between the clusters are clearly visible. Even the better-off households have consumption poverty headcount ratios of between 37 to 50% at PPP $1.25. For households from the poorest clusters the poverty headcount ratio amounts to even 70% for income and 80% for consumption. Especially the households largely depending on natural resource extraction are characterized by a high incidence of poverty and high vulnerability. In addition, there are a number of pressures which are expected to increase poverty problems in the future. Policies aimed at reducing poverty and improving rural livelihoods need to carefully consider the close linkages between rural livelihoods and natural resources. But also a diversification away from natural resource extraction into higher-skilled jobs is found to be a strategy opening up new opportunities to improve livelihood security and raise the living standards of the poor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Green Finance: A Step closer to Sustainable Development Enhancing Tribal Land Tenure Security in Odisha: Otelp- Landesa Partnership Lassen Sich Haltelinien, Finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit Und Generationenge-Rechtigkeit Trotz Der Corona-Pandemie Miteinander Verbinden? (Can Stop Lines, Financial Sustainability and Generational Equity Be Combined Despite the Corona Pandemic?) Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Bangladesh: Organizational Gap Analysis- Case Study on Ministry of Housing and Public Works Livelihood Sustainability Status and Challenges of South-western Coastal Area of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1