关联合同中仲裁条款的延伸:理论与法理分析

Felipe Fernandes Ribeiro Maia, Bruno Alvim Horta Carneiro
{"title":"关联合同中仲裁条款的延伸:理论与法理分析","authors":"Felipe Fernandes Ribeiro Maia, Bruno Alvim Horta Carneiro","doi":"10.54648/rba2023012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the interpretation criteria used by national doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the possibility of extending the arbitration clause in linked contracts. Aspects related to the autonomy of the will in arbitration are analyzed, as well as hypotheses for expanding the arbitration agreement to non-signatory third parties, also presenting doctrinal and national Courts positions regarding the extension of the scope of the arbitration clause provided in only one of the related instruments. Thus, it is intended to demonstrate that the main criteria used to expand or restrict the arbitration pact, consist of verifying in the specific case the intensity of the link between the interconnected businesses, with an analysis of the degree of dependence on the obligations and rights existing in each contract vis-à-vis the contract single economic operation, in order to eventually justify the expansion of arbitration jurisdiction by the tacit consent of those involved.\nArbitration; linked contracts; arbitration clause; extension; doctrine; jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extensão da cláusula compromissória em contratos coligados: análise doutrinária e jurisprudencial\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Fernandes Ribeiro Maia, Bruno Alvim Horta Carneiro\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/rba2023012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the interpretation criteria used by national doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the possibility of extending the arbitration clause in linked contracts. Aspects related to the autonomy of the will in arbitration are analyzed, as well as hypotheses for expanding the arbitration agreement to non-signatory third parties, also presenting doctrinal and national Courts positions regarding the extension of the scope of the arbitration clause provided in only one of the related instruments. Thus, it is intended to demonstrate that the main criteria used to expand or restrict the arbitration pact, consist of verifying in the specific case the intensity of the link between the interconnected businesses, with an analysis of the degree of dependence on the obligations and rights existing in each contract vis-à-vis the contract single economic operation, in order to eventually justify the expansion of arbitration jurisdiction by the tacit consent of those involved.\\nArbitration; linked contracts; arbitration clause; extension; doctrine; jurisprudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2023012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2023012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是概述各国理论和判例在关联合同中扩展仲裁条款的可能性方面所使用的解释标准。本文分析了与仲裁中遗嘱自治有关的各个方面,以及将仲裁协议扩大到非签署人第三方的假设,并提出了理论和国家法院对仅在一项有关文书中规定的仲裁条款范围的扩大的立场。因此,本文旨在表明,用于扩大或限制仲裁协议的主要标准,包括在具体情况下核实相互关联的业务之间的联系强度,并分析每个合同中存在的义务和权利相对于-à-vis合同单一经济运作的依赖程度,以便最终证明通过相关各方的默许来扩大仲裁管辖权是合理的。有关合同;仲裁条款;扩展;学说;法学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extensão da cláusula compromissória em contratos coligados: análise doutrinária e jurisprudencial
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the interpretation criteria used by national doctrine and jurisprudence regarding the possibility of extending the arbitration clause in linked contracts. Aspects related to the autonomy of the will in arbitration are analyzed, as well as hypotheses for expanding the arbitration agreement to non-signatory third parties, also presenting doctrinal and national Courts positions regarding the extension of the scope of the arbitration clause provided in only one of the related instruments. Thus, it is intended to demonstrate that the main criteria used to expand or restrict the arbitration pact, consist of verifying in the specific case the intensity of the link between the interconnected businesses, with an analysis of the degree of dependence on the obligations and rights existing in each contract vis-à-vis the contract single economic operation, in order to eventually justify the expansion of arbitration jurisdiction by the tacit consent of those involved. Arbitration; linked contracts; arbitration clause; extension; doctrine; jurisprudence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breaking Ground or Playing Safe? Evaluating the Proposed Changes in German Arbitration Law Extensão da cláusula compromissória em contratos coligados: análise doutrinária e jurisprudencial Rapport de Synthèse da XVII Conferência Internacional de Arbitragem do Rio de Janeiro – Inovações Processuais e a Busca pela Eficiência A Inteligência Artificial e o seu contributo para o processo de mediação (na forma de negociação assistida por terceiro independente e imparcial). Um robô mediador ou um algoritmo pacificador de conflitos? Relato sobre o 11th ICC Brazilian Arbitration Day – 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1