“他们喜欢你假装成另一个人。”

Nina Held, Karen Mccarthy
{"title":"“他们喜欢你假装成另一个人。”","authors":"Nina Held, Karen Mccarthy","doi":"10.4324/9781315210810-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores 'realizations of the activism of Intersectionality' by looking at the intersections of gender, sexuality, ‘race’, religion and ‘refugeeness’. We argue that bringing ‘refugeeness’ into intersectional analysis challenges the concept of intersectionality in particular ways. Drawing on examples of our voluntary work with the Lesbian Immigration Support Group (LISG), we discuss current issues faced by bisexual women and lesbians when they are seeking sanctuary in the UK. \n To win recognition as a refugee and therefore become 'documented' most members of LISG have to fight for recognition as a lesbian first. ‘Proving’ sexuality lies at the heart of the matter, with the majority of cases refused on credibility i.e. that the claimant is not believed to be a lesbian. In recent years, we have seen an increasing number of judgements where it has been argued that women ‘pretend’ to be lesbians. Claimants feel pressured to conform to Western, racialised homonormative notions of what lesbian sexuality looks like, having spent most of their lives ‘pretending' NOT to be lesbian, for their own safety. Thus, women find themselves in a 'politics of location' full of contradictions: excited to be able to express and explore their sexuality, but unrecognised by the UKVI and the courts as 'genuine' lesbians. \n Within the group of (mainly white European) volunteers we then face the big task of challenging these assumptions, whilst we might also have different understanding of what it means to be a 'genuine’ lesbian, depending on our lived experience of intersectionality. Together with members of LISG, we will explore our different experiences and understandings of sexuality and 'pretended' identities and show how Black feminist theory can be utilised to work productively through these tensions and contradictions and find ways of holding it all together.","PeriodicalId":120193,"journal":{"name":"Intersectionality in Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘They like you to pretend to be something you are not’\",\"authors\":\"Nina Held, Karen Mccarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315210810-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores 'realizations of the activism of Intersectionality' by looking at the intersections of gender, sexuality, ‘race’, religion and ‘refugeeness’. We argue that bringing ‘refugeeness’ into intersectional analysis challenges the concept of intersectionality in particular ways. Drawing on examples of our voluntary work with the Lesbian Immigration Support Group (LISG), we discuss current issues faced by bisexual women and lesbians when they are seeking sanctuary in the UK. \\n To win recognition as a refugee and therefore become 'documented' most members of LISG have to fight for recognition as a lesbian first. ‘Proving’ sexuality lies at the heart of the matter, with the majority of cases refused on credibility i.e. that the claimant is not believed to be a lesbian. In recent years, we have seen an increasing number of judgements where it has been argued that women ‘pretend’ to be lesbians. Claimants feel pressured to conform to Western, racialised homonormative notions of what lesbian sexuality looks like, having spent most of their lives ‘pretending' NOT to be lesbian, for their own safety. Thus, women find themselves in a 'politics of location' full of contradictions: excited to be able to express and explore their sexuality, but unrecognised by the UKVI and the courts as 'genuine' lesbians. \\n Within the group of (mainly white European) volunteers we then face the big task of challenging these assumptions, whilst we might also have different understanding of what it means to be a 'genuine’ lesbian, depending on our lived experience of intersectionality. Together with members of LISG, we will explore our different experiences and understandings of sexuality and 'pretended' identities and show how Black feminist theory can be utilised to work productively through these tensions and contradictions and find ways of holding it all together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intersectionality in Social Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intersectionality in Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210810-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersectionality in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210810-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本章通过观察性别、性、“种族”、宗教和“难民”的交叉点,探讨了“交叉性行动主义的实现”。我们认为,将“难民”纳入交叉分析,以特定的方式挑战了交叉性的概念。以我们与女同性恋移民支持小组(LISG)的志愿工作为例,我们讨论了双性恋女性和女同性恋在英国寻求庇护时面临的当前问题。为了赢得难民身份的认可,并因此成为“有记录的”,LISG的大多数成员必须首先争取同性恋身份的认可。“证明”性取向是问题的核心,大多数案件因可信度而被拒绝,即原告不被认为是女同性恋。近年来,我们看到越来越多的判决认为女性“假装”是女同性恋。原告感到有压力去遵从西方的、种族化的同性恋性行为的标准观念,为了自己的安全,他们花了大部分时间“假装”不是女同性恋。因此,女性发现自己处于一个充满矛盾的“地理位置政治”中:她们很高兴能够表达和探索自己的性取向,但却不被英国移民局和法院认可为“真正的”女同性恋。在一组(主要是欧洲白人)志愿者中,我们面临着挑战这些假设的艰巨任务,同时我们也可能对“真正的”女同性恋意味着什么有不同的理解,这取决于我们对交集的生活经历。与LISG的成员一起,我们将探索我们对性和“假装”身份的不同经历和理解,并展示如何利用黑人女权主义理论有效地解决这些紧张和矛盾,并找到将它们结合在一起的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘They like you to pretend to be something you are not’
This chapter explores 'realizations of the activism of Intersectionality' by looking at the intersections of gender, sexuality, ‘race’, religion and ‘refugeeness’. We argue that bringing ‘refugeeness’ into intersectional analysis challenges the concept of intersectionality in particular ways. Drawing on examples of our voluntary work with the Lesbian Immigration Support Group (LISG), we discuss current issues faced by bisexual women and lesbians when they are seeking sanctuary in the UK. To win recognition as a refugee and therefore become 'documented' most members of LISG have to fight for recognition as a lesbian first. ‘Proving’ sexuality lies at the heart of the matter, with the majority of cases refused on credibility i.e. that the claimant is not believed to be a lesbian. In recent years, we have seen an increasing number of judgements where it has been argued that women ‘pretend’ to be lesbians. Claimants feel pressured to conform to Western, racialised homonormative notions of what lesbian sexuality looks like, having spent most of their lives ‘pretending' NOT to be lesbian, for their own safety. Thus, women find themselves in a 'politics of location' full of contradictions: excited to be able to express and explore their sexuality, but unrecognised by the UKVI and the courts as 'genuine' lesbians. Within the group of (mainly white European) volunteers we then face the big task of challenging these assumptions, whilst we might also have different understanding of what it means to be a 'genuine’ lesbian, depending on our lived experience of intersectionality. Together with members of LISG, we will explore our different experiences and understandings of sexuality and 'pretended' identities and show how Black feminist theory can be utilised to work productively through these tensions and contradictions and find ways of holding it all together.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The politics of intersectionality as location Returning home Gendered Islamophobia The impossibility of adulthood with a learning disability and the possibilities of digital activism Reflections on the theory and practice of intersectionality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1