Muhammad Siraj Khan, Naghma Farid, Farhaj Sikandar Yar Khan Baloch
{"title":"朝觐期间的一个腐败案例和巴基斯坦遥遥领先的司法系统","authors":"Muhammad Siraj Khan, Naghma Farid, Farhaj Sikandar Yar Khan Baloch","doi":"10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-ii).14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court of Pakistan received a letter from the government of Saudi Arabia claiming corruption in the Ministry of Religious Affairs' hajj arrangements. In response to the letter, the court invited the Secretaries of religious and foreign affairs to clarify their respective positions. A committee of lawmakers was formed to investigate the situation. On September 1, 2010, the committee issued a report to the prime minister of Pakistan and the chief justice of the supreme court that confirmed Hujjaj's building-rental irregularities. In response to the complaints of several Hujjaj, Justice Khalil Ul Rehman Ramday forwarded the summary with the following comments: \"Many individuals came to me in Makah Mukarramah.Complaints were even submitted in writing. \"Action as may be thought suitable to eliminate the sufferings of thousands of Hajjis who spend their entire lives saving pennies to perform Hajj, only to have the money they've earned through their blood and sweat lost.\" The article explores the Hajj corruption issue and the role of Pakistan's Supreme Court. A qualitative study employing content analysis as an analysis method has been undertaken. For primary sources, judicial decisions, the statements of prominent jurists, parliamentary actions, and biographies have been consulted.","PeriodicalId":235368,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Sciences Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Instance of Corruption during the Hajj and Pakistan's Far-Superior Judiciary System\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Siraj Khan, Naghma Farid, Farhaj Sikandar Yar Khan Baloch\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-ii).14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Supreme Court of Pakistan received a letter from the government of Saudi Arabia claiming corruption in the Ministry of Religious Affairs' hajj arrangements. In response to the letter, the court invited the Secretaries of religious and foreign affairs to clarify their respective positions. A committee of lawmakers was formed to investigate the situation. On September 1, 2010, the committee issued a report to the prime minister of Pakistan and the chief justice of the supreme court that confirmed Hujjaj's building-rental irregularities. In response to the complaints of several Hujjaj, Justice Khalil Ul Rehman Ramday forwarded the summary with the following comments: \\\"Many individuals came to me in Makah Mukarramah.Complaints were even submitted in writing. \\\"Action as may be thought suitable to eliminate the sufferings of thousands of Hajjis who spend their entire lives saving pennies to perform Hajj, only to have the money they've earned through their blood and sweat lost.\\\" The article explores the Hajj corruption issue and the role of Pakistan's Supreme Court. A qualitative study employing content analysis as an analysis method has been undertaken. For primary sources, judicial decisions, the statements of prominent jurists, parliamentary actions, and biographies have been consulted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Social Sciences Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Social Sciences Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-ii).14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-ii).14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
巴基斯坦最高法院收到一封来自沙特阿拉伯政府的信,信中声称宗教事务部的朝觐安排存在腐败。作为对这封信的回应,法院请宗教部长和外交部长澄清各自的立场。成立了一个由议员组成的委员会来调查这一情况。2010年9月1日,委员会向巴基斯坦总理和最高法院首席大法官提交了一份报告,证实了Hujjaj的建筑租赁违规行为。在回应几个Hujjaj的投诉时,Khalil Ul Rehman Ramday法官转发了摘要,并发表了以下评论:“许多人到Makah Mukarramah来找我。投诉甚至以书面形式提出。“这是一种可以被认为是合适的行动,可以消除成千上万的朝觐人的痛苦,他们一生都在攒钱去朝觐,结果却让他们用血汗赚来的钱付之东流。”这篇文章探讨了朝觐的腐败问题和巴基斯坦最高法院的作用。采用内容分析作为分析方法进行了定性研究。主要资料来源包括司法判决、著名法学家的声明、议会行动和传记。
An Instance of Corruption during the Hajj and Pakistan's Far-Superior Judiciary System
The Supreme Court of Pakistan received a letter from the government of Saudi Arabia claiming corruption in the Ministry of Religious Affairs' hajj arrangements. In response to the letter, the court invited the Secretaries of religious and foreign affairs to clarify their respective positions. A committee of lawmakers was formed to investigate the situation. On September 1, 2010, the committee issued a report to the prime minister of Pakistan and the chief justice of the supreme court that confirmed Hujjaj's building-rental irregularities. In response to the complaints of several Hujjaj, Justice Khalil Ul Rehman Ramday forwarded the summary with the following comments: "Many individuals came to me in Makah Mukarramah.Complaints were even submitted in writing. "Action as may be thought suitable to eliminate the sufferings of thousands of Hajjis who spend their entire lives saving pennies to perform Hajj, only to have the money they've earned through their blood and sweat lost." The article explores the Hajj corruption issue and the role of Pakistan's Supreme Court. A qualitative study employing content analysis as an analysis method has been undertaken. For primary sources, judicial decisions, the statements of prominent jurists, parliamentary actions, and biographies have been consulted.