乌克兰和欧盟成员国行政司法机构当事人调解程序的主体构成

Maria Slyvka, Vasyl Slyvka
{"title":"乌克兰和欧盟成员国行政司法机构当事人调解程序的主体构成","authors":"Maria Slyvka, Vasyl Slyvka","doi":"10.23939/law2023.37.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he article discloses the subject composition of the procedure of conciliation of the parties in the administrative proceedings of Ukraine and EU member states. It is noted that the main subjects of the procedure of conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings are the parties to the dispute themselves, who wished to reconcile, and the legislation should influence these subjects only with the aim of facilitating their achievement of peace. It is indicated that today the judge appears in the conciliation procedure as: 1) \"relatively active conciliator\"; 2) the subject of judicial control over compliance with legality in the reconciliation procedure; 3) the legalizer of the terms of reconciliation. In practical reality, this role of the judge is manifested in the fact that the terms of reconciliation of the parties to a public-law dispute, which they set out in the application for reconciliation, acquire legal significance for them (create real legal obligations for the parties, which they must comply with) only after , as the judge approves them. It was established that in Ukraine there is a simple model of the subject composition of the parties' reconciliation in administrative proceedings, which is characterized by certain elements of a relatively complicated model of the corresponding subject composition (the judge encourages the parties to try to reconcile, however, does not provide them with certain options for reconciliation, which they should be considered). It is noted that, unlike in Ukraine, a judge in the French Republic can not only suggest that the parties to the dispute resort to the conciliation procedure, but also oblige them to try to reconcile when he sees this as a real possibility. It was concluded that in some EU member states (for example, in the Kingdom of Spain), in which public-law disputes can be resolved through judicial conciliation (conciliation in administrative proceedings), a judge can act as a \"relatively active conciliator\", who, having convinced himself of the possibility to reconcile the parties to the dispute, can form for them an option (options) of reconciliation that can be accepted (modified, rejected). In addition, in some EU member states (French Republic and Kingdom of Spain), the activity of conciliators, who are certified lawyers (as a rule, lawyers), is provided for.","PeriodicalId":421282,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subject composition of the procedure for conciliation of the parties in the administrative judiciary of Ukraine and EU member states\",\"authors\":\"Maria Slyvka, Vasyl Slyvka\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/law2023.37.195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he article discloses the subject composition of the procedure of conciliation of the parties in the administrative proceedings of Ukraine and EU member states. It is noted that the main subjects of the procedure of conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings are the parties to the dispute themselves, who wished to reconcile, and the legislation should influence these subjects only with the aim of facilitating their achievement of peace. It is indicated that today the judge appears in the conciliation procedure as: 1) \\\"relatively active conciliator\\\"; 2) the subject of judicial control over compliance with legality in the reconciliation procedure; 3) the legalizer of the terms of reconciliation. In practical reality, this role of the judge is manifested in the fact that the terms of reconciliation of the parties to a public-law dispute, which they set out in the application for reconciliation, acquire legal significance for them (create real legal obligations for the parties, which they must comply with) only after , as the judge approves them. It was established that in Ukraine there is a simple model of the subject composition of the parties' reconciliation in administrative proceedings, which is characterized by certain elements of a relatively complicated model of the corresponding subject composition (the judge encourages the parties to try to reconcile, however, does not provide them with certain options for reconciliation, which they should be considered). It is noted that, unlike in Ukraine, a judge in the French Republic can not only suggest that the parties to the dispute resort to the conciliation procedure, but also oblige them to try to reconcile when he sees this as a real possibility. It was concluded that in some EU member states (for example, in the Kingdom of Spain), in which public-law disputes can be resolved through judicial conciliation (conciliation in administrative proceedings), a judge can act as a \\\"relatively active conciliator\\\", who, having convinced himself of the possibility to reconcile the parties to the dispute, can form for them an option (options) of reconciliation that can be accepted (modified, rejected). In addition, in some EU member states (French Republic and Kingdom of Spain), the activity of conciliators, who are certified lawyers (as a rule, lawyers), is provided for.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.37.195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.37.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文揭示了乌克兰与欧盟成员国行政诉讼中当事人调解程序的主体构成。委员会指出,行政诉讼中当事方调解程序的主要对象是希望和解的争端当事方本身,立法只应影响这些主体,目的是促进它们实现和平。有迹象表明,今天法官在调解程序中出现:1)“相对积极的调解人”;(2)和解程序是否符合合法性的司法控制主体;3)和解条件的法制化。在实际现实中,法官的这种作用表现为,只有在法官批准之后,公法纠纷当事人在和解申请中提出的和解条件才对他们具有法律意义(为当事人创造了他们必须遵守的真正的法律义务)。可以确定的是,在乌克兰有一种简单的行政诉讼中当事人和解主体构成模式,其特点是相应主体构成模式相对复杂的某些要素(法官鼓励当事人努力和解,但不向他们提供某些和解选择,他们应该考虑这些选择)。应当指出,与乌克兰不同的是,法兰西共和国的法官不仅可以建议争端各方诉诸调解程序,而且还可以在他认为这是一种真正的可能性时迫使它们设法和解。结论是,在一些可以通过司法调解(行政诉讼中的调解)解决公法纠纷的欧盟成员国(例如西班牙王国),法官可以作为“相对积极的调解人”,他确信自己有可能使争端各方和解,可以为他们形成一个可以接受(修改,拒绝)的和解选项。此外,在一些欧盟成员国(法兰西共和国和西班牙王国),规定了调解员的活动,调解员是经过认证的律师(通常是律师)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subject composition of the procedure for conciliation of the parties in the administrative judiciary of Ukraine and EU member states
he article discloses the subject composition of the procedure of conciliation of the parties in the administrative proceedings of Ukraine and EU member states. It is noted that the main subjects of the procedure of conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings are the parties to the dispute themselves, who wished to reconcile, and the legislation should influence these subjects only with the aim of facilitating their achievement of peace. It is indicated that today the judge appears in the conciliation procedure as: 1) "relatively active conciliator"; 2) the subject of judicial control over compliance with legality in the reconciliation procedure; 3) the legalizer of the terms of reconciliation. In practical reality, this role of the judge is manifested in the fact that the terms of reconciliation of the parties to a public-law dispute, which they set out in the application for reconciliation, acquire legal significance for them (create real legal obligations for the parties, which they must comply with) only after , as the judge approves them. It was established that in Ukraine there is a simple model of the subject composition of the parties' reconciliation in administrative proceedings, which is characterized by certain elements of a relatively complicated model of the corresponding subject composition (the judge encourages the parties to try to reconcile, however, does not provide them with certain options for reconciliation, which they should be considered). It is noted that, unlike in Ukraine, a judge in the French Republic can not only suggest that the parties to the dispute resort to the conciliation procedure, but also oblige them to try to reconcile when he sees this as a real possibility. It was concluded that in some EU member states (for example, in the Kingdom of Spain), in which public-law disputes can be resolved through judicial conciliation (conciliation in administrative proceedings), a judge can act as a "relatively active conciliator", who, having convinced himself of the possibility to reconcile the parties to the dispute, can form for them an option (options) of reconciliation that can be accepted (modified, rejected). In addition, in some EU member states (French Republic and Kingdom of Spain), the activity of conciliators, who are certified lawyers (as a rule, lawyers), is provided for.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canonical pedagogy in metaphysical law Peculiarities of the introduction of the joint transit procedure in Ukraine Cyber security of the banking sector of Ukraine: concepts, problems and experience of foreign countries Measures to ensure the institutional independence of the judiciary The role of higher government bodies in European integration processes of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1