{"title":"符号趋同与废除主义:一个术语的重新诠释","authors":"Ralph R. Smith, Russel R. Windes","doi":"10.1080/10417949309372921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The Force of Fantasy, Ernest Bormann creates a misleading dichotomy between evangelical, conversionary abolitionists and secular, radical abolitionists. By relying on superseded historical interpretation, he has constructed a narrative based on this dichotomy which leads to confusion about the origins and dynamics of abolitionist rhetoric. This essay seeks to amend Bormann's narrative by employing terministic analysis to trace the development of radical abolitionism to its origins in evangelical religion. Such analysis can enrich our understanding of abolitionist rhetoric and point to new directions for research in rhetorical movement studies.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symbolic convergence and abolitionism: A terministic reinterpretation\",\"authors\":\"Ralph R. Smith, Russel R. Windes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949309372921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In The Force of Fantasy, Ernest Bormann creates a misleading dichotomy between evangelical, conversionary abolitionists and secular, radical abolitionists. By relying on superseded historical interpretation, he has constructed a narrative based on this dichotomy which leads to confusion about the origins and dynamics of abolitionist rhetoric. This essay seeks to amend Bormann's narrative by employing terministic analysis to trace the development of radical abolitionism to its origins in evangelical religion. Such analysis can enrich our understanding of abolitionist rhetoric and point to new directions for research in rhetorical movement studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372921\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Symbolic convergence and abolitionism: A terministic reinterpretation
In The Force of Fantasy, Ernest Bormann creates a misleading dichotomy between evangelical, conversionary abolitionists and secular, radical abolitionists. By relying on superseded historical interpretation, he has constructed a narrative based on this dichotomy which leads to confusion about the origins and dynamics of abolitionist rhetoric. This essay seeks to amend Bormann's narrative by employing terministic analysis to trace the development of radical abolitionism to its origins in evangelical religion. Such analysis can enrich our understanding of abolitionist rhetoric and point to new directions for research in rhetorical movement studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
