{"title":"导管与慢流颈动脉造影在高度血管化的脑组织中的比较。","authors":"C W Vette, J H Ruijs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefits of the direct-puncture carotid angiography with the proximal-compression technique are not fully evaluated if not compared with a more simple diagnostic procedure, i.e. the femoral-catheter technique. In order to discuss this, a case history of a patient who underwent simultaneously both types of examination is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":76405,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia clinica","volume":"46 5","pages":"364-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter versus slow-flow carotid angiography in a highly vascularized process of the brain.\",\"authors\":\"C W Vette, J H Ruijs\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The benefits of the direct-puncture carotid angiography with the proximal-compression technique are not fully evaluated if not compared with a more simple diagnostic procedure, i.e. the femoral-catheter technique. In order to discuss this, a case history of a patient who underwent simultaneously both types of examination is presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia clinica\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"364-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Catheter versus slow-flow carotid angiography in a highly vascularized process of the brain.
The benefits of the direct-puncture carotid angiography with the proximal-compression technique are not fully evaluated if not compared with a more simple diagnostic procedure, i.e. the femoral-catheter technique. In order to discuss this, a case history of a patient who underwent simultaneously both types of examination is presented.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
