{"title":"临床意识与临床科学","authors":"David Armstrong","doi":"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90041-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The advent of the controlled clinical trial in the interwar years upset the balance between science and clinical experience as forms of medical knowledge. It had the effect of opening areas of clinical practice to the possibility of evaluation by patients and by government. More recent trends suggest a return to the importance of clinical experience and the concomitant authority it confers on the doctor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101166,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","volume":"11 11","pages":"Pages 599-601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90041-5","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical sense and clinical science\",\"authors\":\"David Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90041-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The advent of the controlled clinical trial in the interwar years upset the balance between science and clinical experience as forms of medical knowledge. It had the effect of opening areas of clinical practice to the possibility of evaluation by patients and by government. More recent trends suggest a return to the importance of clinical experience and the concomitant authority it confers on the doctor.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine (1967)\",\"volume\":\"11 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 599-601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90041-5\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine (1967)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0037785677900415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0037785677900415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The advent of the controlled clinical trial in the interwar years upset the balance between science and clinical experience as forms of medical knowledge. It had the effect of opening areas of clinical practice to the possibility of evaluation by patients and by government. More recent trends suggest a return to the importance of clinical experience and the concomitant authority it confers on the doctor.