{"title":"目标识别算法的性能与所使用的判别后处理技术有关","authors":"M. Cohen, V. Sylvester","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.1998.710120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A target identification algorithm can be thought of as being comprised of a pre-processor, discriminant generator, and a post-processor. The pre-processor forms and otherwise conditions the target signatures. The discriminant generator forms scalar quantities that represent the closeness-of-fit of each signature to the target classes of interest. Finally, the post-processor utilizes those scalars to form a decision as to the target that the signature came from; i.e., the identity of the target being examined. In this paper, we start with a full set of discriminants generated by a particular pre-processor and discriminant generator operating on high-range-resolution (HRR) signatures of aircraft, and we perform various experiments to determine the effect on algorithm performance of applying various post-processing techniques. The overall target identification algorithm is described, numerous post-processing techniques are introduced, and their effects on performance are tabulated. It is shown that optimal combined performance of these techniques does not necessarily follow from combining the individual best-performing techniques. That is, an optimal post-processing architecture cannot be derived from a simple search of the diagonal of the multi-dimensional set of post-processing options.","PeriodicalId":202280,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1998. Celebrating 50 Years (Cat. No.98CH36185)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of a target identification algorithm as a function of the discriminant post-processing techniques utilized\",\"authors\":\"M. Cohen, V. Sylvester\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAECON.1998.710120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A target identification algorithm can be thought of as being comprised of a pre-processor, discriminant generator, and a post-processor. The pre-processor forms and otherwise conditions the target signatures. The discriminant generator forms scalar quantities that represent the closeness-of-fit of each signature to the target classes of interest. Finally, the post-processor utilizes those scalars to form a decision as to the target that the signature came from; i.e., the identity of the target being examined. In this paper, we start with a full set of discriminants generated by a particular pre-processor and discriminant generator operating on high-range-resolution (HRR) signatures of aircraft, and we perform various experiments to determine the effect on algorithm performance of applying various post-processing techniques. The overall target identification algorithm is described, numerous post-processing techniques are introduced, and their effects on performance are tabulated. It is shown that optimal combined performance of these techniques does not necessarily follow from combining the individual best-performing techniques. That is, an optimal post-processing architecture cannot be derived from a simple search of the diagonal of the multi-dimensional set of post-processing options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1998. Celebrating 50 Years (Cat. No.98CH36185)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1998. Celebrating 50 Years (Cat. No.98CH36185)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1998.710120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1998. Celebrating 50 Years (Cat. No.98CH36185)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1998.710120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of a target identification algorithm as a function of the discriminant post-processing techniques utilized
A target identification algorithm can be thought of as being comprised of a pre-processor, discriminant generator, and a post-processor. The pre-processor forms and otherwise conditions the target signatures. The discriminant generator forms scalar quantities that represent the closeness-of-fit of each signature to the target classes of interest. Finally, the post-processor utilizes those scalars to form a decision as to the target that the signature came from; i.e., the identity of the target being examined. In this paper, we start with a full set of discriminants generated by a particular pre-processor and discriminant generator operating on high-range-resolution (HRR) signatures of aircraft, and we perform various experiments to determine the effect on algorithm performance of applying various post-processing techniques. The overall target identification algorithm is described, numerous post-processing techniques are introduced, and their effects on performance are tabulated. It is shown that optimal combined performance of these techniques does not necessarily follow from combining the individual best-performing techniques. That is, an optimal post-processing architecture cannot be derived from a simple search of the diagonal of the multi-dimensional set of post-processing options.