R. Bird, J. Gibbons, Stefan Mehner, J. Voigtländer, T. Schrijvers
{"title":"理解习惯的前后遍历","authors":"R. Bird, J. Gibbons, Stefan Mehner, J. Voigtländer, T. Schrijvers","doi":"10.1145/2503778.2503781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present new ways of reasoning about a particular class of effectful Haskell programs, namely those expressed as idiomatic traversals. Starting out with a specific problem about labelling and unlabelling binary trees, we extract a general inversion law, applicable to any monad, relating a traversal over the elements of an arbitrary traversable type to a traversal that goes in the opposite direction. This law can be invoked to show that, in a suitable sense, unlabelling is the inverse of labelling. The inversion law, as well as a number of other properties of idiomatic traversals, is a corollary of a more general theorem characterising traversable functors as finitary containers: an arbitrary traversable object can be decomposed uniquely into shape and contents, and traversal be understood in terms of those. Proof of the theorem involves the properties of traversal in a special idiom related to the free applicative functor.","PeriodicalId":188691,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGPLAN Symposium/Workshop on Haskell","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding idiomatic traversals backwards and forwards\",\"authors\":\"R. Bird, J. Gibbons, Stefan Mehner, J. Voigtländer, T. Schrijvers\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2503778.2503781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present new ways of reasoning about a particular class of effectful Haskell programs, namely those expressed as idiomatic traversals. Starting out with a specific problem about labelling and unlabelling binary trees, we extract a general inversion law, applicable to any monad, relating a traversal over the elements of an arbitrary traversable type to a traversal that goes in the opposite direction. This law can be invoked to show that, in a suitable sense, unlabelling is the inverse of labelling. The inversion law, as well as a number of other properties of idiomatic traversals, is a corollary of a more general theorem characterising traversable functors as finitary containers: an arbitrary traversable object can be decomposed uniquely into shape and contents, and traversal be understood in terms of those. Proof of the theorem involves the properties of traversal in a special idiom related to the free applicative functor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Symposium/Workshop on Haskell\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Symposium/Workshop on Haskell\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2503778.2503781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGPLAN Symposium/Workshop on Haskell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2503778.2503781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding idiomatic traversals backwards and forwards
We present new ways of reasoning about a particular class of effectful Haskell programs, namely those expressed as idiomatic traversals. Starting out with a specific problem about labelling and unlabelling binary trees, we extract a general inversion law, applicable to any monad, relating a traversal over the elements of an arbitrary traversable type to a traversal that goes in the opposite direction. This law can be invoked to show that, in a suitable sense, unlabelling is the inverse of labelling. The inversion law, as well as a number of other properties of idiomatic traversals, is a corollary of a more general theorem characterising traversable functors as finitary containers: an arbitrary traversable object can be decomposed uniquely into shape and contents, and traversal be understood in terms of those. Proof of the theorem involves the properties of traversal in a special idiom related to the free applicative functor.