意大利混合新闻媒体系统中的公民、两极分化和流行病

L. Iannelli, Giada Marino, Danilo Serani, A. Valeriani
{"title":"意大利混合新闻媒体系统中的公民、两极分化和流行病","authors":"L. Iannelli, Giada Marino, Danilo Serani, A. Valeriani","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Italy was the first Western democracy to experience mass lockdown in response to COVID-19. In the early stages of the pandemic, citizens' trust in the government increased and journalists “indexed” to institutional sources; however, elite polarization was not long in coming, in tandem with an infodemic. Rooted in this context, this longitudinal study investigates Italian citizens' positions on an issue which lies at the very heart of democracy: the balance between public health and individual freedoms. Findings indicate that citizens' opinions did not polarize between extreme communitarian and libertarian stances. On the contrary, a significant majority of citizens expressed strong beliefs in the primacy of public health over their freedoms. Extreme libertarians were only a minority, and their positions were driven by a completely different vision of the news reliability of “older” and “newer” media arenas, different attitudes toward the “official truth,” and different levels of trust in the government to those of extreme communitarians. Implications are discussed in the conclusion.","PeriodicalId":121894,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens, Polarization, and the Pandemic in the Italian Hybrid News Media System\",\"authors\":\"L. Iannelli, Giada Marino, Danilo Serani, A. Valeriani\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Italy was the first Western democracy to experience mass lockdown in response to COVID-19. In the early stages of the pandemic, citizens' trust in the government increased and journalists “indexed” to institutional sources; however, elite polarization was not long in coming, in tandem with an infodemic. Rooted in this context, this longitudinal study investigates Italian citizens' positions on an issue which lies at the very heart of democracy: the balance between public health and individual freedoms. Findings indicate that citizens' opinions did not polarize between extreme communitarian and libertarian stances. On the contrary, a significant majority of citizens expressed strong beliefs in the primacy of public health over their freedoms. Extreme libertarians were only a minority, and their positions were driven by a completely different vision of the news reliability of “older” and “newer” media arenas, different attitudes toward the “official truth,” and different levels of trust in the government to those of extreme communitarians. Implications are discussed in the conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

意大利是第一个为应对COVID-19而大规模封锁的西方民主国家。在大流行的早期阶段,公民对政府的信任增加,记者与机构来源“挂钩”;然而,精英两极分化与信息大流行同时出现的时间并不长。在这种背景下,这项纵向研究调查了意大利公民对民主核心问题的立场:公共卫生与个人自由之间的平衡。调查结果显示,市民的意见在极端社群主义和自由主义立场之间没有两极分化。相反,绝大多数公民强烈认为,公共卫生优先于他们的自由。极端自由意志主义者只是少数,他们的立场是由“老”和“新”媒体领域对新闻可靠性的完全不同的看法、对“官方真相”的不同态度、对政府的不同信任程度和极端社群主义者的不同所驱动的。结论部分讨论了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Citizens, Polarization, and the Pandemic in the Italian Hybrid News Media System
Italy was the first Western democracy to experience mass lockdown in response to COVID-19. In the early stages of the pandemic, citizens' trust in the government increased and journalists “indexed” to institutional sources; however, elite polarization was not long in coming, in tandem with an infodemic. Rooted in this context, this longitudinal study investigates Italian citizens' positions on an issue which lies at the very heart of democracy: the balance between public health and individual freedoms. Findings indicate that citizens' opinions did not polarize between extreme communitarian and libertarian stances. On the contrary, a significant majority of citizens expressed strong beliefs in the primacy of public health over their freedoms. Extreme libertarians were only a minority, and their positions were driven by a completely different vision of the news reliability of “older” and “newer” media arenas, different attitudes toward the “official truth,” and different levels of trust in the government to those of extreme communitarians. Implications are discussed in the conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Placing Portuguese Right-Wing Populism Into Context Citizens' Political Discourses on Climate Change and Vaccines Will Live Streaming Platforms and Influencers Consolidate or Disrupt Democracy? Citizens, Polarization, and the Pandemic in the Italian Hybrid News Media System Populism, Its Prevalence, and Its Negative Influence on Democratic Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1