定义、评估和加强书面执行控制的更广泛方法

G. McCloskey
{"title":"定义、评估和加强书面执行控制的更广泛方法","authors":"G. McCloskey","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863564.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Narrow definitions of executive function (EF) are contrasted with a broad perspective on executive control that compares Olive’s description of executive control of the writing process and Graham’s Writing within Communities (WWC) model with the Holarchical Model of Executive Control (HMEC). Assessment of EFs is discussed within the context of writing tasks rather than a domain-general perspective. Examples are provided demonstrating a cascading production analysis method for comparing norm-referenced writing test subtest scores to identify cascading production decrements. The evidence-based self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) approach to strengthening executive control to improve writing is compared to a generalized approach to strengthening executive control for multiple purposes derived from the HMEC and EF intervention research reviews. The chapter closes with a brief commentary on the past, present and future of researching and applying broad and narrow perspectives on strengthening executive control to help improve writing skills.","PeriodicalId":117445,"journal":{"name":"Executive Functions and Writing","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broader Approaches to Defining, Assessing, and Strengthening Executive Control in Writing\",\"authors\":\"G. McCloskey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198863564.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Narrow definitions of executive function (EF) are contrasted with a broad perspective on executive control that compares Olive’s description of executive control of the writing process and Graham’s Writing within Communities (WWC) model with the Holarchical Model of Executive Control (HMEC). Assessment of EFs is discussed within the context of writing tasks rather than a domain-general perspective. Examples are provided demonstrating a cascading production analysis method for comparing norm-referenced writing test subtest scores to identify cascading production decrements. The evidence-based self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) approach to strengthening executive control to improve writing is compared to a generalized approach to strengthening executive control for multiple purposes derived from the HMEC and EF intervention research reviews. The chapter closes with a brief commentary on the past, present and future of researching and applying broad and narrow perspectives on strengthening executive control to help improve writing skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Executive Functions and Writing\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Executive Functions and Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863564.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Executive Functions and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863564.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

执行功能(EF)的狭义定义与执行控制的广义观点形成对比,前者将Olive对写作过程的执行控制的描述与Graham的社区内写作(WWC)模型与执行控制的整体模型(HMEC)进行比较。EFs的评估是在编写任务的上下文中讨论的,而不是从领域的角度来讨论。示例演示了用于比较规范参考写作测试子测试分数以识别级联生产减量的级联生产分析方法。本文将基于证据的自我调节策略发展(SRSD)强化执行控制以提高写作水平的方法与基于HMEC和EF干预研究综述的强化多目的执行控制的广义方法进行了比较。本章以一个简短的评论过去,现在和未来的研究和应用的广泛和狭隘的观点,加强执行控制,以帮助提高写作技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Broader Approaches to Defining, Assessing, and Strengthening Executive Control in Writing
Narrow definitions of executive function (EF) are contrasted with a broad perspective on executive control that compares Olive’s description of executive control of the writing process and Graham’s Writing within Communities (WWC) model with the Holarchical Model of Executive Control (HMEC). Assessment of EFs is discussed within the context of writing tasks rather than a domain-general perspective. Examples are provided demonstrating a cascading production analysis method for comparing norm-referenced writing test subtest scores to identify cascading production decrements. The evidence-based self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) approach to strengthening executive control to improve writing is compared to a generalized approach to strengthening executive control for multiple purposes derived from the HMEC and EF intervention research reviews. The chapter closes with a brief commentary on the past, present and future of researching and applying broad and narrow perspectives on strengthening executive control to help improve writing skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broader Approaches to Defining, Assessing, and Strengthening Executive Control in Writing Executive Control and the Writer(s)-Within-Community Model Assessment of Executive Functions in Children Executive Functions and Writing Skills in Children and Adolescents Current Issues in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Executive Function Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1