{"title":"政治二元性:论前政治家和前政府官员担任董事会的利与弊","authors":"Mark Fuller, C. Bart","doi":"10.22495/cbv16i3art1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we examine two key issues situated at the intersection of corporate governance and corporate political activity literature. The first is whether the presence of ex-politicians or former government officials on a corporate board provides a competitive advantage for the firm. A second, related question is whether the presence of these outside directors on the board of directors is perceived as desirable by their fellow directors. While some have characterized the study of board processes as a black box (Leblanc, 2003; Pugliese et al., 2009) due to the difficulty in acquiring data, we circumvented this challenge by directly surveying 82 Canadian board members, then delved deeper with ten directors using supplemental qualitative interviews. The results were examined via the lens of strategic positioning theory in contrast to the well-worn use of agency and resource dependency theories in the literature. Our findings suggest that heterogeneous benefits may accrue depending upon the industry involved, and the political experience of the director(s) in question. However, a majority of current directors expressed significant reservations concerning the appointment of a political director. These findings, combined with the understudied Canadian context and the use of qualitative research methods, contribute to the extant literature.","PeriodicalId":422974,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Entrepreneurship (Management) (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Duality: On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Ex-Politicians and Former Government Officials Serving on Boards of Directors\",\"authors\":\"Mark Fuller, C. Bart\",\"doi\":\"10.22495/cbv16i3art1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we examine two key issues situated at the intersection of corporate governance and corporate political activity literature. The first is whether the presence of ex-politicians or former government officials on a corporate board provides a competitive advantage for the firm. A second, related question is whether the presence of these outside directors on the board of directors is perceived as desirable by their fellow directors. While some have characterized the study of board processes as a black box (Leblanc, 2003; Pugliese et al., 2009) due to the difficulty in acquiring data, we circumvented this challenge by directly surveying 82 Canadian board members, then delved deeper with ten directors using supplemental qualitative interviews. The results were examined via the lens of strategic positioning theory in contrast to the well-worn use of agency and resource dependency theories in the literature. Our findings suggest that heterogeneous benefits may accrue depending upon the industry involved, and the political experience of the director(s) in question. However, a majority of current directors expressed significant reservations concerning the appointment of a political director. These findings, combined with the understudied Canadian context and the use of qualitative research methods, contribute to the extant literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Entrepreneurship (Management) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Entrepreneurship (Management) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv16i3art1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Entrepreneurship (Management) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv16i3art1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本研究中,我们研究了位于公司治理和公司政治活动文献交叉点的两个关键问题。第一个问题是,前政治家或前政府官员进入公司董事会是否能为公司带来竞争优势。第二个与此相关的问题是,这些外部董事进入董事会是否会被其他董事认为是可取的。虽然有些人将董事会流程的研究描述为黑盒子(Leblanc, 2003;Pugliese et al., 2009)由于难以获取数据,我们通过直接调查82名加拿大董事会成员来规避这一挑战,然后使用补充定性访谈对10名董事进行更深入的研究。研究结果是通过战略定位理论的视角来检验的,而不是文献中老生常谈的代理和资源依赖理论。我们的研究结果表明,根据所涉及的行业和相关董事的政治经验,异质性利益可能会产生。但是,大多数现任董事对任命一名政治董事表示重大保留。这些发现,结合未充分研究的加拿大背景和定性研究方法的使用,为现有文献做出了贡献。
The Political Duality: On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Ex-Politicians and Former Government Officials Serving on Boards of Directors
In this study, we examine two key issues situated at the intersection of corporate governance and corporate political activity literature. The first is whether the presence of ex-politicians or former government officials on a corporate board provides a competitive advantage for the firm. A second, related question is whether the presence of these outside directors on the board of directors is perceived as desirable by their fellow directors. While some have characterized the study of board processes as a black box (Leblanc, 2003; Pugliese et al., 2009) due to the difficulty in acquiring data, we circumvented this challenge by directly surveying 82 Canadian board members, then delved deeper with ten directors using supplemental qualitative interviews. The results were examined via the lens of strategic positioning theory in contrast to the well-worn use of agency and resource dependency theories in the literature. Our findings suggest that heterogeneous benefits may accrue depending upon the industry involved, and the political experience of the director(s) in question. However, a majority of current directors expressed significant reservations concerning the appointment of a political director. These findings, combined with the understudied Canadian context and the use of qualitative research methods, contribute to the extant literature.