使专家认知过程可见:理论物理研究的规划与初步分析

Mike Verostek, Molly Griston, Jes�s Botello, B. Zwickl
{"title":"使专家认知过程可见:理论物理研究的规划与初步分析","authors":"Mike Verostek, Molly Griston, Jes�s Botello, B. Zwickl","doi":"10.1119/perc.2022.pr.verostek","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many of the activities and cognitive processes that physicists use while solving problems are “invisible” to students, which can hinder their acquisition of important expert-like skills. Whereas the detailed calculations performed by researchers are often published in journals and textbooks, other activities such as those undertaken while planning how to approach a problem are rarely discussed in published research. Hence, these activities are especially hidden from students. To better understand how physicists solve problems in their professional research, we leveraged the framework of cognitive task analysis to conduct semi-structured interviews with theoretical physicists ( N = 11 ). Here we elucidate the role of planning and preliminary analysis in theorists’ work. Theorists described using a variety of activities in order to decide if their project was doable while also generating possible solution paths. These actions included doing preliminary calculations, reflecting on previous knowledge, gaining intuition and understanding by studying prior work, and reproducing previous results. We found that theorists typically did not pursue projects unless they had a clear idea of what the outcome of their project would be, or at least knew that they would be able to make progress on the problem. Thus, this preliminary design and analysis phase was highly important for theorists despite being largely hidden from students. We conclude by suggesting potential ways to incorporate our findings into the classroom to give students more numerous opportunities to engage in these expert-like practices.","PeriodicalId":253382,"journal":{"name":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making expert cognitive processes visible: planning and preliminary analysis in theoretical physics research\",\"authors\":\"Mike Verostek, Molly Griston, Jes�s Botello, B. Zwickl\",\"doi\":\"10.1119/perc.2022.pr.verostek\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many of the activities and cognitive processes that physicists use while solving problems are “invisible” to students, which can hinder their acquisition of important expert-like skills. Whereas the detailed calculations performed by researchers are often published in journals and textbooks, other activities such as those undertaken while planning how to approach a problem are rarely discussed in published research. Hence, these activities are especially hidden from students. To better understand how physicists solve problems in their professional research, we leveraged the framework of cognitive task analysis to conduct semi-structured interviews with theoretical physicists ( N = 11 ). Here we elucidate the role of planning and preliminary analysis in theorists’ work. Theorists described using a variety of activities in order to decide if their project was doable while also generating possible solution paths. These actions included doing preliminary calculations, reflecting on previous knowledge, gaining intuition and understanding by studying prior work, and reproducing previous results. We found that theorists typically did not pursue projects unless they had a clear idea of what the outcome of their project would be, or at least knew that they would be able to make progress on the problem. Thus, this preliminary design and analysis phase was highly important for theorists despite being largely hidden from students. We conclude by suggesting potential ways to incorporate our findings into the classroom to give students more numerous opportunities to engage in these expert-like practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.verostek\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.verostek","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

物理学家在解决问题时使用的许多活动和认知过程对学生来说是“看不见的”,这可能会阻碍他们获得重要的专家技能。虽然研究人员进行的详细计算经常发表在期刊和教科书上,但在已发表的研究中很少讨论其他活动,例如在计划如何解决问题时进行的活动。因此,这些活动特别不让学生知道。为了更好地了解物理学家在专业研究中如何解决问题,我们利用认知任务分析的框架对理论物理学家进行了半结构化访谈(N = 11)。在此,我们阐明了计划和初步分析在理论家工作中的作用。理论家们描述了使用各种各样的活动来决定他们的项目是否可行,同时也产生可能的解决方案路径。这些行动包括做初步计算,反思以前的知识,通过研究以前的工作获得直觉和理解,以及重现以前的结果。我们发现,理论家通常不会继续研究项目,除非他们对项目的结果有一个清晰的概念,或者至少知道他们能够在这个问题上取得进展。因此,这个初步的设计和分析阶段对理论家来说是非常重要的,尽管很大程度上对学生来说是隐藏的。最后,我们提出了一些潜在的方法,将我们的发现融入课堂,让学生有更多的机会参与这些专家般的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making expert cognitive processes visible: planning and preliminary analysis in theoretical physics research
Many of the activities and cognitive processes that physicists use while solving problems are “invisible” to students, which can hinder their acquisition of important expert-like skills. Whereas the detailed calculations performed by researchers are often published in journals and textbooks, other activities such as those undertaken while planning how to approach a problem are rarely discussed in published research. Hence, these activities are especially hidden from students. To better understand how physicists solve problems in their professional research, we leveraged the framework of cognitive task analysis to conduct semi-structured interviews with theoretical physicists ( N = 11 ). Here we elucidate the role of planning and preliminary analysis in theorists’ work. Theorists described using a variety of activities in order to decide if their project was doable while also generating possible solution paths. These actions included doing preliminary calculations, reflecting on previous knowledge, gaining intuition and understanding by studying prior work, and reproducing previous results. We found that theorists typically did not pursue projects unless they had a clear idea of what the outcome of their project would be, or at least knew that they would be able to make progress on the problem. Thus, this preliminary design and analysis phase was highly important for theorists despite being largely hidden from students. We conclude by suggesting potential ways to incorporate our findings into the classroom to give students more numerous opportunities to engage in these expert-like practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesizing disabled physics students' pathways to access: a call for more access talk Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments Impact of mathematical reasoning on students� understanding of quantum optics Leveraging queer epistemic subjectivity to advance justice through physics teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1