Amedeo Arena, Napoli Italia Facultatea de Drept Universitatea ‘Federico Ii’
{"title":"De la o factură de electricitate la supremația dreptului european: astfel s-a născut doctrina Costa c. Enel","authors":"Amedeo Arena, Napoli Italia Facultatea de Drept Universitatea ‘Federico Ii’","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2021.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whilst Costa vs. ENEL is the locus classicus for most accounts of the primacy of European law, the story of that lawsuit is still relatively unknown. What drove Flaminio Costa to sue his electricity provider over a bill of as little as ₤1.925 (about €22 in 2020)? Why did the Small-claims Court of Milan decide to involve both the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice in such a „petty” lawsuit? Why did those two courts hand down such different rulings? How did the lawsuit end when it came back from Luxembourg? Relying upon previously undisclosed court documents and interviews with some of the actors involved, this paper seeks to shed some light on the less-known aspects of the Costa v ENEL lawsuit, against the background of electricity nationalization in Italy at the height of the Cold War, and to assess the contribution of that lawsuit and of its „architect”, Gian Galeazzo Stendardi, to the approfondissement of the doctrine of primacy of European law.","PeriodicalId":142426,"journal":{"name":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/aubd.2021.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然Costa诉ENEL案是大多数关于欧洲法律首要地位的经典案例,但该诉讼的故事仍然相对不为人所知。是什么促使弗拉米尼奥·科斯塔(Flaminio Costa)起诉他的电力供应商,因为他的电费只有1.925英镑(相当于2020年的22欧元)?为什么米兰小额索赔法院决定将意大利宪法法院和欧洲法院同时卷入这样一场“微不足道”的诉讼?为什么这两个法院会做出如此不同的裁决?从卢森堡发回的诉讼结果如何?本文依靠以前未公开的法庭文件和对一些参与者的采访,试图在冷战高峰时期意大利电力国有化的背景下,揭示一些鲜为人知的Costa诉ENEL诉讼的方面,并评估该诉讼及其“建筑师”Gian Galeazzo Stendardi对支持欧洲法律至上主义的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De la o factură de electricitate la supremația dreptului european: astfel s-a născut doctrina Costa c. Enel
Whilst Costa vs. ENEL is the locus classicus for most accounts of the primacy of European law, the story of that lawsuit is still relatively unknown. What drove Flaminio Costa to sue his electricity provider over a bill of as little as ₤1.925 (about €22 in 2020)? Why did the Small-claims Court of Milan decide to involve both the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice in such a „petty” lawsuit? Why did those two courts hand down such different rulings? How did the lawsuit end when it came back from Luxembourg? Relying upon previously undisclosed court documents and interviews with some of the actors involved, this paper seeks to shed some light on the less-known aspects of the Costa v ENEL lawsuit, against the background of electricity nationalization in Italy at the height of the Cold War, and to assess the contribution of that lawsuit and of its „architect”, Gian Galeazzo Stendardi, to the approfondissement of the doctrine of primacy of European law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerespectarea hotărârilor judecătorești pronunțate în materia conflictelor de muncă De la o factură de electricitate la supremația dreptului european: astfel s-a născut doctrina Costa c. Enel Convenția de la Lanzarote privită prin prisma unor prevederi din partea specială a Codului penal al Republicii Moldova și din cea a Codului penal al României Tipuri de investigații sub acoperire Dreptul românesc în Basarabia – înainte și după Marea Unire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1