面向Web站点提取器的基准:呼吁社区参与

H. Kienle, S. Sim
{"title":"面向Web站点提取器的基准:呼吁社区参与","authors":"H. Kienle, S. Sim","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2003.1192414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to propose a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for Web sites and to invite interested researchers and practitioners to participate in its development. Fact extraction is a fundamental and difficult problem in both traditional software reverse engineering and Web site reverse engineering. In both domains, there are often irregularities in the input that violate an extractor's unstated assumptions. Consequently, it is difficult to predict how an extractor will perform in a given input. To remedy this problem, we created a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for the C++ programming language. We found that this benchmark improved our understanding of fact extraction, the tools produced, and the maturity of the community. The same approach, we believe, will be beneficial for Web site extractors and we propose WebETS (Web site Extractor Test Suite.) In this paper we give some starting points for the design of WebETS and ask others to join in the effort.","PeriodicalId":236632,"journal":{"name":"Seventh European Conference onSoftware Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a benchmark for Web site extractors: a call for community participation\",\"authors\":\"H. Kienle, S. Sim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2003.1192414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to propose a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for Web sites and to invite interested researchers and practitioners to participate in its development. Fact extraction is a fundamental and difficult problem in both traditional software reverse engineering and Web site reverse engineering. In both domains, there are often irregularities in the input that violate an extractor's unstated assumptions. Consequently, it is difficult to predict how an extractor will perform in a given input. To remedy this problem, we created a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for the C++ programming language. We found that this benchmark improved our understanding of fact extraction, the tools produced, and the maturity of the community. The same approach, we believe, will be beneficial for Web site extractors and we propose WebETS (Web site Extractor Test Suite.) In this paper we give some starting points for the design of WebETS and ask others to join in the effort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seventh European Conference onSoftware Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seventh European Conference onSoftware Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2003.1192414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventh European Conference onSoftware Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2003.1192414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是提出一个比较Web站点的事实提取器的基准,并邀请感兴趣的研究人员和实践者参与其开发。事实抽取是传统软件逆向工程和网站逆向工程的基础和难点问题。在这两个领域中,输入中经常存在违反提取器未声明假设的不规则性。因此,很难预测提取器在给定输入中的表现。为了解决这个问题,我们创建了一个基准,用于比较c++编程语言的事实提取器。我们发现这个基准提高了我们对事实提取、产生的工具和社区成熟度的理解。我们相信,同样的方法对Web站点提取器也是有益的,因此我们提出了WebETS (Web站点提取器测试套件)。在本文中,我们给出了一些设计webbets的出发点,并邀请其他人加入进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a benchmark for Web site extractors: a call for community participation
The purpose of this paper is to propose a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for Web sites and to invite interested researchers and practitioners to participate in its development. Fact extraction is a fundamental and difficult problem in both traditional software reverse engineering and Web site reverse engineering. In both domains, there are often irregularities in the input that violate an extractor's unstated assumptions. Consequently, it is difficult to predict how an extractor will perform in a given input. To remedy this problem, we created a benchmark for comparing fact extractors for the C++ programming language. We found that this benchmark improved our understanding of fact extraction, the tools produced, and the maturity of the community. The same approach, we believe, will be beneficial for Web site extractors and we propose WebETS (Web site Extractor Test Suite.) In this paper we give some starting points for the design of WebETS and ask others to join in the effort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast symbolic evaluation of C/C++ preprocessing using conditional values Fast flow analysis to compute fuzzy estimates of risk levels Software services and software maintenance Enabling legacy system accessibility by Web heterogeneous clients Towards a benchmark for Web site extractors: a call for community participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1