有争议的埃塞俄比亚国家地位概念

Daniel Mulugeta
{"title":"有争议的埃塞俄比亚国家地位概念","authors":"Daniel Mulugeta","doi":"10.4324/9780429202049-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, I discuss why I chose Ethiopia as a case through which to study state formation in Africa. Moreover, in working towards the ethnography of the state, this chapter, and this book in general, attempts to highlight and challenge several bodies of literature that, in various ways, focus on making sense of the nature and role of the state in Ethiopia. My analysis takes its point of departure from two difficulties faced when conceptualising the state in Ethiopia. One is the problem of pinpointing its location in African studies. Scholarly discussions about the state in subSaharan Africa have tended to afford only a marginal place and level of analysis to the Ethiopian state because, for many scholars, it is considered an anomaly. In the first part of this chapter, I will make the opposite point: Ethiopia represents one sociocultural and political formation in a diverse continent.","PeriodicalId":149739,"journal":{"name":"The Everyday State in Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contested conceptualisations of Ethiopian statehood\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Mulugeta\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429202049-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, I discuss why I chose Ethiopia as a case through which to study state formation in Africa. Moreover, in working towards the ethnography of the state, this chapter, and this book in general, attempts to highlight and challenge several bodies of literature that, in various ways, focus on making sense of the nature and role of the state in Ethiopia. My analysis takes its point of departure from two difficulties faced when conceptualising the state in Ethiopia. One is the problem of pinpointing its location in African studies. Scholarly discussions about the state in subSaharan Africa have tended to afford only a marginal place and level of analysis to the Ethiopian state because, for many scholars, it is considered an anomaly. In the first part of this chapter, I will make the opposite point: Ethiopia represents one sociocultural and political formation in a diverse continent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Everyday State in Africa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Everyday State in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429202049-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Everyday State in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429202049-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本章中,我将讨论为什么我选择埃塞俄比亚作为研究非洲国家形成的案例。此外,在研究国家民族志的过程中,本章和本书总体上试图突出和挑战一些以不同方式专注于理解埃塞俄比亚国家性质和作用的文献。我的分析是从埃塞俄比亚国家概念化所面临的两个困难出发的。一个是在非洲研究中精确定位的问题。关于撒哈拉以南非洲国家的学术讨论往往只给埃塞俄比亚国家提供一个边缘位置和分析水平,因为对许多学者来说,它被认为是一种反常现象。在本章的第一部分,我将提出相反的观点:埃塞俄比亚在一个多样化的大陆上代表了一种社会文化和政治形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contested conceptualisations of Ethiopian statehood
In this chapter, I discuss why I chose Ethiopia as a case through which to study state formation in Africa. Moreover, in working towards the ethnography of the state, this chapter, and this book in general, attempts to highlight and challenge several bodies of literature that, in various ways, focus on making sense of the nature and role of the state in Ethiopia. My analysis takes its point of departure from two difficulties faced when conceptualising the state in Ethiopia. One is the problem of pinpointing its location in African studies. Scholarly discussions about the state in subSaharan Africa have tended to afford only a marginal place and level of analysis to the Ethiopian state because, for many scholars, it is considered an anomaly. In the first part of this chapter, I will make the opposite point: Ethiopia represents one sociocultural and political formation in a diverse continent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contested conceptualisations of Ethiopian statehood Boundary-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1