论建构性情态必然性的交互式证明搜索

Favio E. Miranda-Perea, Lourdes del Carmen González Huesca, P. Selene Linares-Arévalo
{"title":"论建构性情态必然性的交互式证明搜索","authors":"Favio E. Miranda-Perea,&nbsp;Lourdes del Carmen González Huesca,&nbsp;P. Selene Linares-Arévalo","doi":"10.1016/j.entcs.2020.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a dual sequent calculus for the necessity fragment of the constructive modal logic S4 and show its adequacy for proof-search in the style of modern interactive theorem provers. The main feature of dual systems is the use of two contexts to capture the notions of true and valid formulas, without using any formal semantics. This attribute allows us to give simple rules for the □ operator that, most of the time, grant the substitution of a strict modal reasoning by a pure propositional one, thus simplifying the proof-search process. Moreover, we introduce a formal notion of backward proof corresponding to a bottom-up construction of a derivation tree by means of a left-to-right depth-first proof-search.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science","volume":"354 ","pages":"Pages 107-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.entcs.2020.10.009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Interactive Proof-Search for Constructive Modal Necessity\",\"authors\":\"Favio E. Miranda-Perea,&nbsp;Lourdes del Carmen González Huesca,&nbsp;P. Selene Linares-Arévalo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.entcs.2020.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present a dual sequent calculus for the necessity fragment of the constructive modal logic S4 and show its adequacy for proof-search in the style of modern interactive theorem provers. The main feature of dual systems is the use of two contexts to capture the notions of true and valid formulas, without using any formal semantics. This attribute allows us to give simple rules for the □ operator that, most of the time, grant the substitution of a strict modal reasoning by a pure propositional one, thus simplifying the proof-search process. Moreover, we introduce a formal notion of backward proof corresponding to a bottom-up construction of a derivation tree by means of a left-to-right depth-first proof-search.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"354 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 107-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.entcs.2020.10.009\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571066120300852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571066120300852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们给出了构造模态逻辑S4的必要片段的对偶序列演算,并证明了它在现代交互定理证明式的证明搜索中的充分性。对偶系统的主要特征是使用两个上下文来捕获真公式和有效公式的概念,而不使用任何形式语义。这个属性允许我们给出□运算符的简单规则,大多数情况下,这些规则允许用纯命题推理代替严格模态推理,从而简化了证明搜索过程。此外,我们通过从左到右的深度优先证明搜索,引入了对应于自底向上构造派生树的向后证明的形式化概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Interactive Proof-Search for Constructive Modal Necessity

We present a dual sequent calculus for the necessity fragment of the constructive modal logic S4 and show its adequacy for proof-search in the style of modern interactive theorem provers. The main feature of dual systems is the use of two contexts to capture the notions of true and valid formulas, without using any formal semantics. This attribute allows us to give simple rules for the □ operator that, most of the time, grant the substitution of a strict modal reasoning by a pure propositional one, thus simplifying the proof-search process. Moreover, we introduce a formal notion of backward proof corresponding to a bottom-up construction of a derivation tree by means of a left-to-right depth-first proof-search.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ENTCS is a venue for the rapid electronic publication of the proceedings of conferences, of lecture notes, monographs and other similar material for which quick publication and the availability on the electronic media is appropriate. Organizers of conferences whose proceedings appear in ENTCS, and authors of other material appearing as a volume in the series are allowed to make hard copies of the relevant volume for limited distribution. For example, conference proceedings may be distributed to participants at the meeting, and lecture notes can be distributed to those taking a course based on the material in the volume.
期刊最新文献
Preface Murphree's Numerical Term Logic Tableaux A Note on Constructive Interpolation for the Multi-Modal Logic Km Paracomplete Logics Dual to the Genuine Paraconsistent Logics: The Three-valued Case Building a Maximal Independent Set for the Vertex-coloring Problem on Planar Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1