新金融众筹法规及其对MiFID II下投资服务的影响

Martin Hobza, Aneta Vondráčková
{"title":"新金融众筹法规及其对MiFID II下投资服务的影响","authors":"Martin Hobza, Aneta Vondráčková","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3725997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation aims at harmonizing the financial crowdfunding regulatory framework in the EU. In many respects inspired by MiFID II, it draws a distinction between crowdfunding services and investment services, but at the same time raises new questions. It seems the Regulation might have a significant impact on how the content of investment-based crowdfunding as well as individual investment services is to be interpreted. The paper aims firstly to analyse the scope of the new Regulation, with special attention to the exemptions set by the Regulation itself as well as those originating from the EU financial services regulatory architecture. Secondly, it evaluates the relationship between investment-based crowdfunding and investment services under MiFID II, namely the reception and transmission of orders and placing on no-commitment basis, in order to distinguish the respective types of activities. Attention is given particularly to the simultaneous provision of reception and transmission of orders and placing on the no-commitment basis as a conceptual characteristic of financial crowdfunding. Finally, the consequences the Regulation might have for the interpretation of scope and content of certain present investment services under MiFID II are analysed. Namely, placing on the no-commitment basis, investment advice and portfolio management are put under scrutiny.","PeriodicalId":233958,"journal":{"name":"European Finance eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The New Financial Crowdfunding Regulation and Its Implications for Investment Services under MiFID II\",\"authors\":\"Martin Hobza, Aneta Vondráčková\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3725997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation aims at harmonizing the financial crowdfunding regulatory framework in the EU. In many respects inspired by MiFID II, it draws a distinction between crowdfunding services and investment services, but at the same time raises new questions. It seems the Regulation might have a significant impact on how the content of investment-based crowdfunding as well as individual investment services is to be interpreted. The paper aims firstly to analyse the scope of the new Regulation, with special attention to the exemptions set by the Regulation itself as well as those originating from the EU financial services regulatory architecture. Secondly, it evaluates the relationship between investment-based crowdfunding and investment services under MiFID II, namely the reception and transmission of orders and placing on no-commitment basis, in order to distinguish the respective types of activities. Attention is given particularly to the simultaneous provision of reception and transmission of orders and placing on the no-commitment basis as a conceptual characteristic of financial crowdfunding. Finally, the consequences the Regulation might have for the interpretation of scope and content of certain present investment services under MiFID II are analysed. Namely, placing on the no-commitment basis, investment advice and portfolio management are put under scrutiny.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新的欧洲众筹服务提供商条例旨在协调欧盟的金融众筹监管框架。在MiFID II的启发下,它在许多方面区分了众筹服务和投资服务,但同时也提出了新的问题。看来,该条例可能会对如何解释投资众筹以及个人投资服务的内容产生重大影响。本文首先旨在分析新法规的范围,特别关注法规本身以及源自欧盟金融服务监管架构的豁免。其次,评估了MiFID II下基于投资的众筹与投资服务之间的关系,即接受和传递订单以及在无承诺的基础上下单,以区分各自的活动类型。特别关注的是同时提供订单的接收和传输,并在无承诺的基础上下单,这是金融众筹的概念特征。最后,分析了该法规可能对MiFID II下某些现有投资服务的范围和内容的解释产生的后果。也就是说,在不承诺的基础上,投资建议和投资组合管理受到严格审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The New Financial Crowdfunding Regulation and Its Implications for Investment Services under MiFID II
The new European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation aims at harmonizing the financial crowdfunding regulatory framework in the EU. In many respects inspired by MiFID II, it draws a distinction between crowdfunding services and investment services, but at the same time raises new questions. It seems the Regulation might have a significant impact on how the content of investment-based crowdfunding as well as individual investment services is to be interpreted. The paper aims firstly to analyse the scope of the new Regulation, with special attention to the exemptions set by the Regulation itself as well as those originating from the EU financial services regulatory architecture. Secondly, it evaluates the relationship between investment-based crowdfunding and investment services under MiFID II, namely the reception and transmission of orders and placing on no-commitment basis, in order to distinguish the respective types of activities. Attention is given particularly to the simultaneous provision of reception and transmission of orders and placing on the no-commitment basis as a conceptual characteristic of financial crowdfunding. Finally, the consequences the Regulation might have for the interpretation of scope and content of certain present investment services under MiFID II are analysed. Namely, placing on the no-commitment basis, investment advice and portfolio management are put under scrutiny.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Option-Like Fund Performance Fees in Asset Management via Monte Carlo Actuarial Distortion Pricing Cultural values of parent bank board members and lending by foreign subsidiaries: The moderating role of personal traits Deleveraging CAPM: Asset Betas vs. Equity Betas The Dynamics of Financial Policies and Group Decisions in Private Firms Money Talks: Information and Seignorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1