在美国,越来越多地使用财产税减免作为促进地方经济活动的手段

Robert W. Wassmer
{"title":"在美国,越来越多地使用财产税减免作为促进地方经济活动的手段","authors":"Robert W. Wassmer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1088482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The swift increase in stand-alone property tax abatement programs (SAPTAPS) allowed within the United States (from 30 percent of the states allowing them in 1964 to 70 percent in 2004), the nationwide erosion in property tax base they likely generate, and the wide variety of arguments given both pro and con for the continued existence of these programs are the reasons their use is explored in this paper. The paper first offers evidence on the increasing use of property tax abatement in the United States, and the arguments previously put forth in favor and against the use of this form of economic development incentive. Next, the economic theory indicating why abatement may promote sub-national economic development is summarized. This is followed by a description of the types and prevalence of SAPTAPs currently in the United States, and a summary of the best empirical evidence that exists on the effects of property tax abatements. The conclusion offers my own recommendations in regard to how sub-national decision makers should view the offering of SAPTAPs and policy suggestions for the future of property tax abatement in the United States.","PeriodicalId":247622,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Fiscal & Monetary Policy in Developing Economies (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Increasing Use of Property Tax Abatement as a Means of Promoting Sub-National Economic Activity in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Robert W. Wassmer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1088482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The swift increase in stand-alone property tax abatement programs (SAPTAPS) allowed within the United States (from 30 percent of the states allowing them in 1964 to 70 percent in 2004), the nationwide erosion in property tax base they likely generate, and the wide variety of arguments given both pro and con for the continued existence of these programs are the reasons their use is explored in this paper. The paper first offers evidence on the increasing use of property tax abatement in the United States, and the arguments previously put forth in favor and against the use of this form of economic development incentive. Next, the economic theory indicating why abatement may promote sub-national economic development is summarized. This is followed by a description of the types and prevalence of SAPTAPs currently in the United States, and a summary of the best empirical evidence that exists on the effects of property tax abatements. The conclusion offers my own recommendations in regard to how sub-national decision makers should view the offering of SAPTAPs and policy suggestions for the future of property tax abatement in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Fiscal & Monetary Policy in Developing Economies (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Fiscal & Monetary Policy in Developing Economies (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1088482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Fiscal & Monetary Policy in Developing Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1088482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

美国允许的独立财产税减免计划(SAPTAPS)的迅速增加(从1964年的30%到2004年的70%),它们可能产生的全国财产税税基的侵蚀,以及对这些计划继续存在的各种支持和反对的论点,是本文探讨其使用的原因。本文首先提供了美国越来越多地使用财产税减免的证据,以及之前提出的支持和反对使用这种形式的经济发展激励的论点。其次,总结了为什么减排可以促进地方经济发展的经济理论。随后描述了目前在美国的saptap的类型和流行程度,并总结了关于财产税减免影响的最佳经验证据。结论就地方决策者应如何看待提供saptap和美国未来财产税减免政策建议提出了我自己的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Increasing Use of Property Tax Abatement as a Means of Promoting Sub-National Economic Activity in the United States
The swift increase in stand-alone property tax abatement programs (SAPTAPS) allowed within the United States (from 30 percent of the states allowing them in 1964 to 70 percent in 2004), the nationwide erosion in property tax base they likely generate, and the wide variety of arguments given both pro and con for the continued existence of these programs are the reasons their use is explored in this paper. The paper first offers evidence on the increasing use of property tax abatement in the United States, and the arguments previously put forth in favor and against the use of this form of economic development incentive. Next, the economic theory indicating why abatement may promote sub-national economic development is summarized. This is followed by a description of the types and prevalence of SAPTAPs currently in the United States, and a summary of the best empirical evidence that exists on the effects of property tax abatements. The conclusion offers my own recommendations in regard to how sub-national decision makers should view the offering of SAPTAPs and policy suggestions for the future of property tax abatement in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inflation and Productive Capacity - An Empirical Risk Reduction Model Hometown Favoritism and Intercity Investment Networks in China Financial Deepening and Entrepreneurial Growth in Nigeria: A Time Series Analysis (1986 – 2018) Benefits of FDI Subsidies: The Role of Funding Sources The Government Spending Multiplier in Latin American Countries: Does the Institutional Environment Matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1