创新研究传统:商品主导逻辑、资源基础逻辑和服务主导逻辑

C. Mele, M. Colurcio, Tiziana Russo-Spena
{"title":"创新研究传统:商品主导逻辑、资源基础逻辑和服务主导逻辑","authors":"C. Mele, M. Colurcio, Tiziana Russo-Spena","doi":"10.1108/MSQ-10-2013-0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer a fresh framing of innovation, as service innovation/value innovation. Design/methodology/approach – By examining the visions, patterns and outcomes of three different research approaches to understanding innovation – goods-dominant (G-D) logic, the resource-based approach and service-dominant (S-D) logic – the authors strive to outline the contribution of each to the debate on innovation. This investigation involves a comprehensive literature review. Scrutiny of a case company provides a means of identifying and illustrating how these approaches play out in a real business context. Findings – A framework for innovation builds on the comparison of the three research approaches. G-D logic, when analysed in terms of new product development and new service development, positions innovation as an output (a new good or service) of a business's internal processes, with the firm as the main actor. The resource-based approach establishes the drivers of innovation as...","PeriodicalId":313036,"journal":{"name":"Managing Service Quality","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic\",\"authors\":\"C. Mele, M. Colurcio, Tiziana Russo-Spena\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/MSQ-10-2013-0223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer a fresh framing of innovation, as service innovation/value innovation. Design/methodology/approach – By examining the visions, patterns and outcomes of three different research approaches to understanding innovation – goods-dominant (G-D) logic, the resource-based approach and service-dominant (S-D) logic – the authors strive to outline the contribution of each to the debate on innovation. This investigation involves a comprehensive literature review. Scrutiny of a case company provides a means of identifying and illustrating how these approaches play out in a real business context. Findings – A framework for innovation builds on the comparison of the three research approaches. G-D logic, when analysed in terms of new product development and new service development, positions innovation as an output (a new good or service) of a business's internal processes, with the firm as the main actor. The resource-based approach establishes the drivers of innovation as...\",\"PeriodicalId\":313036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managing Service Quality\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managing Service Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2013-0223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Service Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2013-0223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

目的-本文的目的是提供一个新的创新框架,如服务创新/价值创新。设计/方法论/方法——通过考察理解创新的三种不同研究方法——商品主导(G-D)逻辑、基于资源的方法和服务主导(S-D)逻辑——的愿景、模式和结果,作者努力概述每种方法对创新辩论的贡献。本研究包括全面的文献综述。对案例公司的仔细研究提供了一种方法,可以识别和说明这些方法如何在真实的业务环境中发挥作用。研究结果-创新框架建立在三种研究方法的比较之上。在新产品开发和新服务开发方面进行分析时,G-D逻辑将创新定位为企业内部流程的输出(新产品或服务),而企业是主要参与者。基于资源的方法将创新的驱动因素确定为……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer a fresh framing of innovation, as service innovation/value innovation. Design/methodology/approach – By examining the visions, patterns and outcomes of three different research approaches to understanding innovation – goods-dominant (G-D) logic, the resource-based approach and service-dominant (S-D) logic – the authors strive to outline the contribution of each to the debate on innovation. This investigation involves a comprehensive literature review. Scrutiny of a case company provides a means of identifying and illustrating how these approaches play out in a real business context. Findings – A framework for innovation builds on the comparison of the three research approaches. G-D logic, when analysed in terms of new product development and new service development, positions innovation as an output (a new good or service) of a business's internal processes, with the firm as the main actor. The resource-based approach establishes the drivers of innovation as...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing complexity and taking a systemic view in service research Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic The collective consumption network Beyond virtuality: from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1