私立大学捐赠基金组合配置的变化:近期趋势及其对相对投资绩效的影响

Donald L. Basch
{"title":"私立大学捐赠基金组合配置的变化:近期趋势及其对相对投资绩效的影响","authors":"Donald L. Basch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1339890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past fifteen years, many U.S. colleges have engaged in a substantial reallocation of their endowment investment portfolios, reducing the share allocated to U.S. stocks and bonds and raising the share allocated to alternatives investments including hedge funds, venture capital, private equity, natural resources, and real estate. The present study, while affirming the presence of an overall reallocation trend, emphasizes the variation that exists among colleges in the extent of reallocation and its impact on investment performance. As has been widely reported, more highly-endowed private colleges have tended to move earlier and more extensively to an alternatives allocation. That pattern has persisted from 1995 to 2007 with some evidence of an increasing divergence among colleges of different endowment sizes in their alternatives allocation. Also as has been widely reported, more highly-endowed private colleges have tended to earn higher cumulative investment returns than less highly-endowed private colleges from 1995 to 2007. Dividing the overall time period into three four-year periods, this tendency is more apparent from 2000 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2007 and less apparent (though still present to a more limited degree) from 1996 to 1999. Some of the impact of endowment size is realized through more highly-endowed colleges' tendency to invest more extensively in alternative assets. Investing more highly in alternatives has a positive effect from 2000 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2007 but actually tends to suppress investment returns from 1996 to 1999. Thus, any analysis of the impact of endowment size and alternatives allocation on investment returns must be sensitive to variation across different years.","PeriodicalId":142467,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the Portfolio Allocation of Private Colleges' Endowments: Recent Trends and Implications for Relative Investment Performance\",\"authors\":\"Donald L. Basch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1339890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past fifteen years, many U.S. colleges have engaged in a substantial reallocation of their endowment investment portfolios, reducing the share allocated to U.S. stocks and bonds and raising the share allocated to alternatives investments including hedge funds, venture capital, private equity, natural resources, and real estate. The present study, while affirming the presence of an overall reallocation trend, emphasizes the variation that exists among colleges in the extent of reallocation and its impact on investment performance. As has been widely reported, more highly-endowed private colleges have tended to move earlier and more extensively to an alternatives allocation. That pattern has persisted from 1995 to 2007 with some evidence of an increasing divergence among colleges of different endowment sizes in their alternatives allocation. Also as has been widely reported, more highly-endowed private colleges have tended to earn higher cumulative investment returns than less highly-endowed private colleges from 1995 to 2007. Dividing the overall time period into three four-year periods, this tendency is more apparent from 2000 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2007 and less apparent (though still present to a more limited degree) from 1996 to 1999. Some of the impact of endowment size is realized through more highly-endowed colleges' tendency to invest more extensively in alternative assets. Investing more highly in alternatives has a positive effect from 2000 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2007 but actually tends to suppress investment returns from 1996 to 1999. Thus, any analysis of the impact of endowment size and alternatives allocation on investment returns must be sensitive to variation across different years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Human Capital\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Human Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1339890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1339890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的15年里,许多美国大学对其捐赠基金投资组合进行了大量的重新配置,减少了分配给美国股票和债券的份额,增加了分配给另类投资的份额,包括对冲基金、风险资本、私募股权、自然资源和房地产。本研究在肯定总体再配置趋势存在的同时,强调了高校之间在再配置程度及其对投资绩效的影响方面存在的差异。正如广泛报道的那样,更多的高捐赠私立大学倾向于更早、更广泛地转向另一种分配方式。这种模式从1995年一直持续到2007年,有一些证据表明,不同捐赠规模的大学在选择分配方面的分歧越来越大。此外,正如广泛报道的那样,从1995年到2007年,捐赠额较高的私立大学往往比捐赠额较低的私立大学获得更高的累计投资回报。将整个时间段划分为三个四年期,这种趋势在2000年至2003年和2004年至2007年期间更为明显,而在1996年至1999年期间则不那么明显(尽管在更有限的程度上仍然存在)。捐赠规模的一些影响是通过捐赠越多的大学倾向于更广泛地投资于另类资产来实现的。在2000年至2003年和2004年至2007年期间,对另类投资的高度投资具有积极影响,但实际上倾向于抑制1996年至1999年期间的投资回报。因此,任何对禀赋规模和替代方案配置对投资回报影响的分析都必须对不同年份的变化敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in the Portfolio Allocation of Private Colleges' Endowments: Recent Trends and Implications for Relative Investment Performance
Over the past fifteen years, many U.S. colleges have engaged in a substantial reallocation of their endowment investment portfolios, reducing the share allocated to U.S. stocks and bonds and raising the share allocated to alternatives investments including hedge funds, venture capital, private equity, natural resources, and real estate. The present study, while affirming the presence of an overall reallocation trend, emphasizes the variation that exists among colleges in the extent of reallocation and its impact on investment performance. As has been widely reported, more highly-endowed private colleges have tended to move earlier and more extensively to an alternatives allocation. That pattern has persisted from 1995 to 2007 with some evidence of an increasing divergence among colleges of different endowment sizes in their alternatives allocation. Also as has been widely reported, more highly-endowed private colleges have tended to earn higher cumulative investment returns than less highly-endowed private colleges from 1995 to 2007. Dividing the overall time period into three four-year periods, this tendency is more apparent from 2000 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2007 and less apparent (though still present to a more limited degree) from 1996 to 1999. Some of the impact of endowment size is realized through more highly-endowed colleges' tendency to invest more extensively in alternative assets. Investing more highly in alternatives has a positive effect from 2000 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2007 but actually tends to suppress investment returns from 1996 to 1999. Thus, any analysis of the impact of endowment size and alternatives allocation on investment returns must be sensitive to variation across different years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Doughboys Network: Social Interactions and the Employment of World War I Veterans Low-Skill Employment and the Changing Economy of Rural America Grade Inflation, Social Background, and Labour Market Matching Schools Before Tools? The Role of Human Capital in a Market Economy Education, Innovation, and Long-Run Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1