Mari Serine Kannelønning, Sunniva Evjen
{"title":"Tillit og tverrfaglighet -om bibliotekaren som forskerstøtte","authors":"Mari Serine Kannelønning, Sunniva Evjen","doi":"10.7146/NTIK.V7I3.111488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological advancements and reforms in the university sector have changed the conditions under which researchers and academic staff work. In turn, university libraries need to adapt to the changing needs of this particular user group. This article highlights which competencies and roles the university librarian needs in order to address these changing needs based on an understanding of the researcher’s work context. How can the academic librarian contribute to the research process? The study on which this article is based has applied Institutional Ethnography (IE), as one methodological approach. IE puts focus on the expert knower, in this case the researcher, who can transmit work knowledge specific to the context in which he or she operates. Applying this approach is one way of dealing with challenges concerning tacit knowledge. In addition, IE provides an opening to revealing new knowledge about a well-studied issue. The data material consists of interviews with researchers (individual and group), and a workshop with academic library staff. Findings show that the researchers’ demands of publications governs their prioritization, but also their relationships to technology and people. The informants’ state that they need to be able to trust that librarians contribute added value and substance to the research process – only then can they be part of the research network. The informants would also like librarians to contribute with a transdisciplinary mindset in transdisciplinary research projects, that they coordinate administrative support, and take charge of research dissemination intended to “popularize” research.","PeriodicalId":246650,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/NTIK.V7I3.111488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大学领域的技术进步和改革改变了研究人员和学术人员的工作条件。反过来,大学图书馆需要适应这一特殊用户群体不断变化的需求。本文强调了大学图书馆员需要哪些能力和角色,以便根据对研究人员工作环境的理解来解决这些不断变化的需求。学术图书馆员如何为研究过程做出贡献?本文所依据的研究采用了制度人种学(IE)作为一种方法论方法。IE把重点放在专家知识上,在这种情况下是研究人员,他们可以将工作知识具体到他或她所处的环境中。运用这种方法是应对隐性知识挑战的一种方法。此外,IE提供了一个揭示关于一个已经被充分研究的问题的新知识的机会。数据材料包括与研究人员(个人和团体)的访谈,以及与学术图书馆工作人员的研讨会。研究结果表明,研究人员对出版物的需求决定了它们的优先顺序,也决定了它们与技术和人的关系。举报人表示,他们需要能够相信图书馆员为研究过程贡献了附加值和实质内容——只有这样,他们才能成为研究网络的一部分。举报人还希望图书馆员在跨学科研究项目中以跨学科的心态做出贡献,协调行政支持,并负责旨在“普及”研究的研究传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tillit og tverrfaglighet -om bibliotekaren som forskerstøtte
Technological advancements and reforms in the university sector have changed the conditions under which researchers and academic staff work. In turn, university libraries need to adapt to the changing needs of this particular user group. This article highlights which competencies and roles the university librarian needs in order to address these changing needs based on an understanding of the researcher’s work context. How can the academic librarian contribute to the research process? The study on which this article is based has applied Institutional Ethnography (IE), as one methodological approach. IE puts focus on the expert knower, in this case the researcher, who can transmit work knowledge specific to the context in which he or she operates. Applying this approach is one way of dealing with challenges concerning tacit knowledge. In addition, IE provides an opening to revealing new knowledge about a well-studied issue. The data material consists of interviews with researchers (individual and group), and a workshop with academic library staff. Findings show that the researchers’ demands of publications governs their prioritization, but also their relationships to technology and people. The informants’ state that they need to be able to trust that librarians contribute added value and substance to the research process – only then can they be part of the research network. The informants would also like librarians to contribute with a transdisciplinary mindset in transdisciplinary research projects, that they coordinate administrative support, and take charge of research dissemination intended to “popularize” research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hvid[mə] Archive BEING CONTENT (?) Ancestral Queendom Introduktion Autokommunikation. Hvad er det?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1