Frank J. Wouda, M. Giuberti, G. Bellusci, Erik Maartens, J. Reenalda, B. Beijnum, P. Veltink
{"title":"不同动作捕捉技术在跑步分析中的有效性研究","authors":"Frank J. Wouda, M. Giuberti, G. Bellusci, Erik Maartens, J. Reenalda, B. Beijnum, P. Veltink","doi":"10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing diversity of available motion capture technologies allows for measurement of human kinematics in various environments. However, little is known about the differences in quality of measured kinematics by such technologies. Therefore, this work presents a comparison between three motion capture approaches, based on inertial-magnetic measurement units (processed with Xsens MVN Analyze) and optical markers (processed using Plug-In Gait and OpenSim Gait2392). It was chosen to evaluate the different motion capture approaches in running, as such kinematics are preferably measured in the natural running environment and involve challenging dynamics. An evaluation was done using data of 8 subjects running on a treadmill at three different speeds, namely 10, 12 and 14 kmlh. The sagittal plane results show excellent correlation $(\\rho > \\pmb{0.96})$ and RMSDs are smaller than 5 degrees for 6 out of the 8 subjects. However, results in the frontal and transversal planes were less correlated between the different motion capture approaches. This shows that sagittal kinematics can be measured consistently using any of the three analyzed motion capture approaches, but ambiguities exist in the analysis of frontal and transversal planes.","PeriodicalId":382522,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Validity of Different Motion Capture Technologies for the Analysis of Running\",\"authors\":\"Frank J. Wouda, M. Giuberti, G. Bellusci, Erik Maartens, J. Reenalda, B. Beijnum, P. Veltink\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An increasing diversity of available motion capture technologies allows for measurement of human kinematics in various environments. However, little is known about the differences in quality of measured kinematics by such technologies. Therefore, this work presents a comparison between three motion capture approaches, based on inertial-magnetic measurement units (processed with Xsens MVN Analyze) and optical markers (processed using Plug-In Gait and OpenSim Gait2392). It was chosen to evaluate the different motion capture approaches in running, as such kinematics are preferably measured in the natural running environment and involve challenging dynamics. An evaluation was done using data of 8 subjects running on a treadmill at three different speeds, namely 10, 12 and 14 kmlh. The sagittal plane results show excellent correlation $(\\\\rho > \\\\pmb{0.96})$ and RMSDs are smaller than 5 degrees for 6 out of the 8 subjects. However, results in the frontal and transversal planes were less correlated between the different motion capture approaches. This shows that sagittal kinematics can be measured consistently using any of the three analyzed motion capture approaches, but ambiguities exist in the analysis of frontal and transversal planes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
越来越多的可用动作捕捉技术允许在各种环境中测量人体运动学。然而,人们对这些技术在测量运动学质量上的差异知之甚少。因此,这项工作提出了三种运动捕捉方法的比较,基于惯性磁测量单元(用Xsens MVN Analyze处理)和光学标记(使用Plug-In步态和OpenSim Gait2392处理)。选择它是为了评估不同的运动捕捉方法在运行中,因为这样的运动学最好是在自然运行环境中测量,并涉及具有挑战性的动力学。对8名受试者在跑步机上以10、12、14 km / h三种不同速度跑步的数据进行评估。矢状面结果显示良好的相关性$(\rho > \pmb{0.96})$和rmsd小于5度的8名受试者中有6名。然而,在不同的动作捕捉方法之间,正面和横向平面的结果相关性较小。这表明,矢状面运动学可以使用三种分析的运动捕捉方法中的任何一种一致地测量,但在正面和横断面的分析中存在歧义。
On the Validity of Different Motion Capture Technologies for the Analysis of Running
An increasing diversity of available motion capture technologies allows for measurement of human kinematics in various environments. However, little is known about the differences in quality of measured kinematics by such technologies. Therefore, this work presents a comparison between three motion capture approaches, based on inertial-magnetic measurement units (processed with Xsens MVN Analyze) and optical markers (processed using Plug-In Gait and OpenSim Gait2392). It was chosen to evaluate the different motion capture approaches in running, as such kinematics are preferably measured in the natural running environment and involve challenging dynamics. An evaluation was done using data of 8 subjects running on a treadmill at three different speeds, namely 10, 12 and 14 kmlh. The sagittal plane results show excellent correlation $(\rho > \pmb{0.96})$ and RMSDs are smaller than 5 degrees for 6 out of the 8 subjects. However, results in the frontal and transversal planes were less correlated between the different motion capture approaches. This shows that sagittal kinematics can be measured consistently using any of the three analyzed motion capture approaches, but ambiguities exist in the analysis of frontal and transversal planes.