{"title":"基于ICESat-2的格陵兰数字高程模型","authors":"Yubin Fan, C. Ke, Xiaoyi Shen","doi":"10.5194/ESSD-2021-183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Greenland digital elevation models (DEMs) are indispensable to fieldwork, ice velocity calculations and mass change estimations. Previous DEMs provided Greenland elevation information for different periods, but long temporal coverage introduced additional time uncertainty to scientific research. To provide a high-resolution DEM with a definite time, approximately 5.8 × 108 ICESat-2 observations from November 2018 to November 2019 were used to generate a new DEM for both the ice sheet and glaciers in peripheral Greenland. A spatiotemporal model fit process was first performed at 500 m resolution. To improve ICESat-2 data utilization, DEMs with 1 km and 2 km resolution across all of Greenland and an additional 5 km resolution in southernmost Greenland were used to fill the DEM gaps. Kriging interpolation was used to fill the remaining 2 % of void grids that were insufficiently observed by ICESat-2 measurements. IceBridge mission data acquired by the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) Lidar system were used to evaluate the accuracy of the newly generated ICESat-2 DEM. Overall, the ICESat-2 DEM had a median difference of −0.48 m for all of Greenland, which agreed well with the IceBridge data, and the performance in the calculated and interpolated grids was similar. Better accuracy could be observed in the northern basins due to the larger proportion of calculated grids with 500 m resolution. The ICESat-2 DEM showed significant improvements in accuracy compared with other altimeter-derived DEMs. Compared to the DEM generated by image pairs, the accuracy was also significantly higher than those of the 1 km ArcticDEM and TanDEM. Similar performance between the ICESat-2 DEM and 500 m ArcticDEM indicated the high accuracy and reliability of the ICESat-2 DEM. Moreover, the ICESat-2 DEM performed better on northern aspects than the 500 m ArcticDEM. Overall, the ICESat-2 DEM showed great accuracy stability under various topographic conditions, hence providing a time-accurate DEM with high accuracy that will be helpful to study elevation and mass balance changes in Greenland. The Greenland DEM and its uncertainty are available at (https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/en/disallow/07497631-047548b5-ba53-c17f9076c72f/, Fan et al, 2021).\n","PeriodicalId":326085,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Science Data Discussions","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new Greenland digital elevation model derived from ICESat-2\",\"authors\":\"Yubin Fan, C. Ke, Xiaoyi Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/ESSD-2021-183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Greenland digital elevation models (DEMs) are indispensable to fieldwork, ice velocity calculations and mass change estimations. Previous DEMs provided Greenland elevation information for different periods, but long temporal coverage introduced additional time uncertainty to scientific research. To provide a high-resolution DEM with a definite time, approximately 5.8 × 108 ICESat-2 observations from November 2018 to November 2019 were used to generate a new DEM for both the ice sheet and glaciers in peripheral Greenland. A spatiotemporal model fit process was first performed at 500 m resolution. To improve ICESat-2 data utilization, DEMs with 1 km and 2 km resolution across all of Greenland and an additional 5 km resolution in southernmost Greenland were used to fill the DEM gaps. Kriging interpolation was used to fill the remaining 2 % of void grids that were insufficiently observed by ICESat-2 measurements. IceBridge mission data acquired by the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) Lidar system were used to evaluate the accuracy of the newly generated ICESat-2 DEM. Overall, the ICESat-2 DEM had a median difference of −0.48 m for all of Greenland, which agreed well with the IceBridge data, and the performance in the calculated and interpolated grids was similar. Better accuracy could be observed in the northern basins due to the larger proportion of calculated grids with 500 m resolution. The ICESat-2 DEM showed significant improvements in accuracy compared with other altimeter-derived DEMs. Compared to the DEM generated by image pairs, the accuracy was also significantly higher than those of the 1 km ArcticDEM and TanDEM. Similar performance between the ICESat-2 DEM and 500 m ArcticDEM indicated the high accuracy and reliability of the ICESat-2 DEM. Moreover, the ICESat-2 DEM performed better on northern aspects than the 500 m ArcticDEM. Overall, the ICESat-2 DEM showed great accuracy stability under various topographic conditions, hence providing a time-accurate DEM with high accuracy that will be helpful to study elevation and mass balance changes in Greenland. The Greenland DEM and its uncertainty are available at (https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/en/disallow/07497631-047548b5-ba53-c17f9076c72f/, Fan et al, 2021).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":326085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Science Data Discussions\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Science Data Discussions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-2021-183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Science Data Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-2021-183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
摘要格陵兰数字高程模型(dem)在野外工作、冰速计算和质量变化估计中是不可或缺的。以前的dem提供了格陵兰岛不同时期的海拔信息,但较长的时间覆盖范围给科学研究带来了额外的时间不确定性。为了提供确定时间的高分辨率DEM,利用2018年11月至2019年11月的大约5.8 × 108次ICESat-2观测数据,生成了格陵兰外围冰盖和冰川的新DEM。首先在500 m分辨率下进行了时空模型拟合过程。为了提高ICESat-2数据的利用率,在整个格陵兰岛使用1公里和2公里分辨率的DEM,并在格陵兰岛最南部使用额外的5公里分辨率来填补DEM的空白。Kriging插值用于填补ICESat-2测量未充分观测到的剩余2%的空白网格。使用机载地形绘图仪(ATM)激光雷达系统获取的冰桥任务数据来评估新生成的ICESat-2 DEM的精度。总体而言,整个格陵兰岛的ICESat-2 DEM的中位数差异为- 0.48 m,与IceBridge数据非常吻合,计算网格和插值网格的性能相似。在北部盆地,500 m分辨率的计算网格所占比例较大,因此观测精度较高。与其他高度计衍生的DEM相比,ICESat-2 DEM的精度有了显著提高。与影像对生成的DEM相比,精度也显著高于1 km ArcticDEM和TanDEM。ICESat-2 DEM与500 m ArcticDEM具有相似的性能,表明ICESat-2 DEM具有较高的精度和可靠性。此外,ICESat-2 DEM在北纬面的表现优于500 m ArcticDEM。总体而言,ICESat-2 DEM在各种地形条件下都表现出良好的精度稳定性,从而提供了一个高精度的时间精度DEM,有助于研究格陵兰岛的高程和物质平衡变化。格陵兰DEM及其不确定性可在(https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/en/disallow/07497631-047548b5-ba53-c17f9076c72f/, Fan et al ., 2021)上获得。
A new Greenland digital elevation model derived from ICESat-2
Abstract. Greenland digital elevation models (DEMs) are indispensable to fieldwork, ice velocity calculations and mass change estimations. Previous DEMs provided Greenland elevation information for different periods, but long temporal coverage introduced additional time uncertainty to scientific research. To provide a high-resolution DEM with a definite time, approximately 5.8 × 108 ICESat-2 observations from November 2018 to November 2019 were used to generate a new DEM for both the ice sheet and glaciers in peripheral Greenland. A spatiotemporal model fit process was first performed at 500 m resolution. To improve ICESat-2 data utilization, DEMs with 1 km and 2 km resolution across all of Greenland and an additional 5 km resolution in southernmost Greenland were used to fill the DEM gaps. Kriging interpolation was used to fill the remaining 2 % of void grids that were insufficiently observed by ICESat-2 measurements. IceBridge mission data acquired by the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) Lidar system were used to evaluate the accuracy of the newly generated ICESat-2 DEM. Overall, the ICESat-2 DEM had a median difference of −0.48 m for all of Greenland, which agreed well with the IceBridge data, and the performance in the calculated and interpolated grids was similar. Better accuracy could be observed in the northern basins due to the larger proportion of calculated grids with 500 m resolution. The ICESat-2 DEM showed significant improvements in accuracy compared with other altimeter-derived DEMs. Compared to the DEM generated by image pairs, the accuracy was also significantly higher than those of the 1 km ArcticDEM and TanDEM. Similar performance between the ICESat-2 DEM and 500 m ArcticDEM indicated the high accuracy and reliability of the ICESat-2 DEM. Moreover, the ICESat-2 DEM performed better on northern aspects than the 500 m ArcticDEM. Overall, the ICESat-2 DEM showed great accuracy stability under various topographic conditions, hence providing a time-accurate DEM with high accuracy that will be helpful to study elevation and mass balance changes in Greenland. The Greenland DEM and its uncertainty are available at (https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/en/disallow/07497631-047548b5-ba53-c17f9076c72f/, Fan et al, 2021).