{"title":"权衡编码复杂性和对包擦除通道的反馈需求","authors":"S. Puducheri, T. Fuja","doi":"10.1109/ALLERTON.2008.4797716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the tradeoffs in employing two different approaches - coding and feedback - for reliable communication over packet erasure channels. Results are shown for a scheme that combines both approaches. Inspired by this scheme, we use rate distortion results to characterize the best achievable tradeoffs for a class of joint coding-and-feedback schemes.","PeriodicalId":120561,"journal":{"name":"2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trading off coding complexity and feedback requirements for the packet erasure channel\",\"authors\":\"S. Puducheri, T. Fuja\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ALLERTON.2008.4797716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the tradeoffs in employing two different approaches - coding and feedback - for reliable communication over packet erasure channels. Results are shown for a scheme that combines both approaches. Inspired by this scheme, we use rate distortion results to characterize the best achievable tradeoffs for a class of joint coding-and-feedback schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2008.4797716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2008.4797716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trading off coding complexity and feedback requirements for the packet erasure channel
We study the tradeoffs in employing two different approaches - coding and feedback - for reliable communication over packet erasure channels. Results are shown for a scheme that combines both approaches. Inspired by this scheme, we use rate distortion results to characterize the best achievable tradeoffs for a class of joint coding-and-feedback schemes.