葡萄牙某中心医院卫生专业人员感染Covid-19 6个月后抗spike SARS-COV-2 IGg抗体的连续测定

Sara Matos, Maria Almeida, Ana Duarte, M. Miranda
{"title":"葡萄牙某中心医院卫生专业人员感染Covid-19 6个月后抗spike SARS-COV-2 IGg抗体的连续测定","authors":"Sara Matos, Maria Almeida, Ana Duarte, M. Miranda","doi":"10.31252/rpso.22.01.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Healthcare workers were heavily exposed to repetitive viral loads during the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic. The duration and effectiveness of post-infection immunity remains an unclear question. The determination of serum IgG anti-S/SARS-CoV-2 (IgG/anti-S) antibodies is the only feasible way to assess immunity against this virus. Methods We’ve identified 193 RT-PCR/SARS-CoV-2 positive from a total of 4200 healthcare workers from an university hospital between March-May 2020. Serum IgG/anti-S was determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay in three anonymized quarterly samples to comparison of mean concentrations over the six months of observation (cut-off defined by the manufacturer: ≥1AU/mL). Disease severity was classified as asymptomatic, mild/moderate and severe/very severe. Results 76.2% were infected women, with mean ( ) age 39.6±11.7 year; men mean age 41.1±13.0 years, and women/men ratio 3.2. 93.8% worked in high-risk areas and 72.5% were nurses or assistants. Regarding the severity, 7.8% had asymptomatic infection and 6.7% had serious illness with inpatient management. 8.3% refused to participate on serologic testing, so 177 participants were included. In the first determination, 73.5% had IgG/anti-S(+ve) (144/166 samples) with 12.5±9.1 AU/mL, collected at =50.3±15.3 days after symptoms onset. At the second time, 47.9% (80/167) had positive results, with IgG/anti-S =2.7±4.9 UA/mL, =143.1±43.9 days after symptoms. The third moment had 27.7% positive results, with IgG/anti-S =1.3±2.8 AU/mL, =241.3±75.5 days after symptoms. Discussion A progressive decrease in mean IgG/anti-S titers was evident during the first six months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, in consonance with the available data, with 13% of professionals presenting antibody levels below the threshold of positivity a month and a half after infection, 52% after four and 72% after six months. We also found that even those with positive titers, at six months, approached the cutoff point, showing a downward curve. Conclusions These results suggest that natural immunity is weak/scarce and reinforce that infected professionals should be vaccinated against COVID-19. This measure, together with the protective (collective plus individuals) actions, maximize workers protection against new infections, as well as the safety of patients of the institution.","PeriodicalId":114994,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Ocupacional","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinação sequencial de Anticorpos IGg Anti-Spike SARS-COV-2 seis meses após infeção Covid-19 em Profissionais de Saúde de um Hospital Central Português\",\"authors\":\"Sara Matos, Maria Almeida, Ana Duarte, M. Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.31252/rpso.22.01.2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Healthcare workers were heavily exposed to repetitive viral loads during the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic. The duration and effectiveness of post-infection immunity remains an unclear question. The determination of serum IgG anti-S/SARS-CoV-2 (IgG/anti-S) antibodies is the only feasible way to assess immunity against this virus. Methods We’ve identified 193 RT-PCR/SARS-CoV-2 positive from a total of 4200 healthcare workers from an university hospital between March-May 2020. Serum IgG/anti-S was determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay in three anonymized quarterly samples to comparison of mean concentrations over the six months of observation (cut-off defined by the manufacturer: ≥1AU/mL). Disease severity was classified as asymptomatic, mild/moderate and severe/very severe. Results 76.2% were infected women, with mean ( ) age 39.6±11.7 year; men mean age 41.1±13.0 years, and women/men ratio 3.2. 93.8% worked in high-risk areas and 72.5% were nurses or assistants. Regarding the severity, 7.8% had asymptomatic infection and 6.7% had serious illness with inpatient management. 8.3% refused to participate on serologic testing, so 177 participants were included. In the first determination, 73.5% had IgG/anti-S(+ve) (144/166 samples) with 12.5±9.1 AU/mL, collected at =50.3±15.3 days after symptoms onset. At the second time, 47.9% (80/167) had positive results, with IgG/anti-S =2.7±4.9 UA/mL, =143.1±43.9 days after symptoms. The third moment had 27.7% positive results, with IgG/anti-S =1.3±2.8 AU/mL, =241.3±75.5 days after symptoms. Discussion A progressive decrease in mean IgG/anti-S titers was evident during the first six months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, in consonance with the available data, with 13% of professionals presenting antibody levels below the threshold of positivity a month and a half after infection, 52% after four and 72% after six months. We also found that even those with positive titers, at six months, approached the cutoff point, showing a downward curve. Conclusions These results suggest that natural immunity is weak/scarce and reinforce that infected professionals should be vaccinated against COVID-19. This measure, together with the protective (collective plus individuals) actions, maximize workers protection against new infections, as well as the safety of patients of the institution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Ocupacional\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Ocupacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31252/rpso.22.01.2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Ocupacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31252/rpso.22.01.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19大流行期间,卫生保健工作者大量暴露于重复病毒载量。感染后免疫的持续时间和有效性仍然是一个不清楚的问题。血清抗s /SARS-CoV-2 IgG (IgG/anti-S)抗体的测定是评估对该病毒免疫的唯一可行方法。方法在2020年3月至5月期间,我们从一所大学医院的4200名医护人员中发现了193例RT-PCR/SARS-CoV-2阳性。通过化学发光免疫分析法测定三个匿名季度样本的血清IgG/anti-S,比较六个月观察期间的平均浓度(由制造商定义的截止值:≥1AU/mL)。疾病严重程度分为无症状、轻度/中度和严重/非常严重。结果女性感染者占76.2%,平均年龄(39.6±11.7)岁;男性平均年龄41.1±13.0岁,男女比3.2。93.8%在高危地区工作,72.5%是护士或助理。严重程度方面,无症状感染占7.8%,重症住院治疗占6.7%。8.3%拒绝参加血清学检测,共纳入177例。第一次检测中,73.5%(144/166份)血清IgG/anti-S(+ve)阳性率为12.5±9.1 AU/mL,于发病后50.3±15.3天采集。第二次检测阳性的占47.9% (80/167),IgG/anti-S =2.7±4.9 UA/mL,出现症状后143.1±43.9 d。第3时刻阳性率为27.7%,IgG/anti-S =1.3±2.8 AU/mL,出现症状后241.3±75.5 d。与现有数据一致,在SARS-CoV-2感染后的前6个月内,平均IgG/anti-S滴度明显下降,13%的专业人员在感染后一个半月出现抗体水平低于阳性阈值,4个月后为52%,6个月后为72%。我们还发现,即使是那些滴度呈阳性的人,在6个月时,也接近临界值,呈现下降曲线。结论自然免疫薄弱/缺乏,应加强对感染专业人员进行COVID-19疫苗接种。这一措施与保护性(集体加个人)行动一起,最大限度地保护工人免受新感染,以及该机构患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinação sequencial de Anticorpos IGg Anti-Spike SARS-COV-2 seis meses após infeção Covid-19 em Profissionais de Saúde de um Hospital Central Português
Introduction Healthcare workers were heavily exposed to repetitive viral loads during the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic. The duration and effectiveness of post-infection immunity remains an unclear question. The determination of serum IgG anti-S/SARS-CoV-2 (IgG/anti-S) antibodies is the only feasible way to assess immunity against this virus. Methods We’ve identified 193 RT-PCR/SARS-CoV-2 positive from a total of 4200 healthcare workers from an university hospital between March-May 2020. Serum IgG/anti-S was determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay in three anonymized quarterly samples to comparison of mean concentrations over the six months of observation (cut-off defined by the manufacturer: ≥1AU/mL). Disease severity was classified as asymptomatic, mild/moderate and severe/very severe. Results 76.2% were infected women, with mean ( ) age 39.6±11.7 year; men mean age 41.1±13.0 years, and women/men ratio 3.2. 93.8% worked in high-risk areas and 72.5% were nurses or assistants. Regarding the severity, 7.8% had asymptomatic infection and 6.7% had serious illness with inpatient management. 8.3% refused to participate on serologic testing, so 177 participants were included. In the first determination, 73.5% had IgG/anti-S(+ve) (144/166 samples) with 12.5±9.1 AU/mL, collected at =50.3±15.3 days after symptoms onset. At the second time, 47.9% (80/167) had positive results, with IgG/anti-S =2.7±4.9 UA/mL, =143.1±43.9 days after symptoms. The third moment had 27.7% positive results, with IgG/anti-S =1.3±2.8 AU/mL, =241.3±75.5 days after symptoms. Discussion A progressive decrease in mean IgG/anti-S titers was evident during the first six months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, in consonance with the available data, with 13% of professionals presenting antibody levels below the threshold of positivity a month and a half after infection, 52% after four and 72% after six months. We also found that even those with positive titers, at six months, approached the cutoff point, showing a downward curve. Conclusions These results suggest that natural immunity is weak/scarce and reinforce that infected professionals should be vaccinated against COVID-19. This measure, together with the protective (collective plus individuals) actions, maximize workers protection against new infections, as well as the safety of patients of the institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abordagem da Saúde Ocupacional perante surtos de Escabiose Lesão Cortoperfurante complicada numa Enfermeira dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários: um Relato de Caso Alérgenos e Asma Ocupacional na Panificação: uma Revisão da Literatura Acidentes de Trabalho em Hospital Central: uma visão holística Avaliação do Risco Cardiovascular (SCORE-2) dos Trabalhadores de um Centro Hospitalar entre 2011 e 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1