“差异显示”方法能对生物精神病学产生影响吗?

M. Strakhova, P. Skolnick
{"title":"“差异显示”方法能对生物精神病学产生影响吗?","authors":"M. Strakhova, P. Skolnick","doi":"10.1017/S1461145701002243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past decade has been marked by a dramatic increase in the availability of techniques to identify and clone genes that are differentially expressed in disease states and by drug treatments. The applications of such techniques to problems in biological psychiatry are manifold and the implications of discovering novel and/or known genes that are perturbed in neuropsychiatric disorders profound. While there are success stories, it is becoming ever more apparent that each of these techniques has its limitations, particularly when applied to the central nervous system. Given that these methods (e.g. differential display, RNA fingerprinting, suppression-subtractive hybridization, microarrays) are labour-intensive and potentially time-consuming, it is important to understand these limitations. For example, differential display is capable of detecting very small changes in the expression of mRNA species. Methods like suppression-subtractive hybridization are better suited to examine potential differences in rare transcripts, but only when their expression is changed substantially (currently ? 5-fold). Moreover, both the functional and morphological organization of the central nervous system present challenges that may not be encountered in other systems. In this overview, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of some of these approaches and their application to research in biological psychiatry.","PeriodicalId":394244,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can 'differential display' methodologies make an impact on biological psychiatry?\",\"authors\":\"M. Strakhova, P. Skolnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1461145701002243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The past decade has been marked by a dramatic increase in the availability of techniques to identify and clone genes that are differentially expressed in disease states and by drug treatments. The applications of such techniques to problems in biological psychiatry are manifold and the implications of discovering novel and/or known genes that are perturbed in neuropsychiatric disorders profound. While there are success stories, it is becoming ever more apparent that each of these techniques has its limitations, particularly when applied to the central nervous system. Given that these methods (e.g. differential display, RNA fingerprinting, suppression-subtractive hybridization, microarrays) are labour-intensive and potentially time-consuming, it is important to understand these limitations. For example, differential display is capable of detecting very small changes in the expression of mRNA species. Methods like suppression-subtractive hybridization are better suited to examine potential differences in rare transcripts, but only when their expression is changed substantially (currently ? 5-fold). Moreover, both the functional and morphological organization of the central nervous system present challenges that may not be encountered in other systems. In this overview, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of some of these approaches and their application to research in biological psychiatry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145701002243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145701002243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

过去十年的特点是,鉴定和克隆在疾病状态下表达差异的基因的技术和药物治疗的可用性急剧增加。这些技术在生物精神病学问题上的应用是多方面的,发现新的和/或已知的基因在神经精神疾病中受到干扰的意义深远。虽然有成功的案例,但越来越明显的是,这些技术都有其局限性,特别是在应用于中枢神经系统时。鉴于这些方法(如差分显示,RNA指纹,抑制-减法杂交,微阵列)是劳动密集型和潜在的耗时,了解这些局限性是很重要的。例如,差分显示能够检测mRNA物种表达的非常小的变化。抑制-减法杂交等方法更适合于检测罕见转录本的潜在差异,但只有当它们的表达发生实质性变化时(目前?5倍)。此外,中枢神经系统的功能和形态组织都面临着其他系统可能不会遇到的挑战。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论其中一些方法的优点和缺点以及它们在生物精神病学研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can 'differential display' methodologies make an impact on biological psychiatry?
The past decade has been marked by a dramatic increase in the availability of techniques to identify and clone genes that are differentially expressed in disease states and by drug treatments. The applications of such techniques to problems in biological psychiatry are manifold and the implications of discovering novel and/or known genes that are perturbed in neuropsychiatric disorders profound. While there are success stories, it is becoming ever more apparent that each of these techniques has its limitations, particularly when applied to the central nervous system. Given that these methods (e.g. differential display, RNA fingerprinting, suppression-subtractive hybridization, microarrays) are labour-intensive and potentially time-consuming, it is important to understand these limitations. For example, differential display is capable of detecting very small changes in the expression of mRNA species. Methods like suppression-subtractive hybridization are better suited to examine potential differences in rare transcripts, but only when their expression is changed substantially (currently ? 5-fold). Moreover, both the functional and morphological organization of the central nervous system present challenges that may not be encountered in other systems. In this overview, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of some of these approaches and their application to research in biological psychiatry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Specific Associations Between Type of Childhood Abuse and Elevated C-Reactive Protein in Young Adult Psychiatric Rehabilitation Participants The Clinical Pharmacology of Entacapone (Comtan®) From the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Reviewer. Sex differences in escalated methamphetamine self-administration and altered gene expression associated with incubation of methamphetamine seeking. Association Between Reduced Brain Glucose Metabolism and Cortical Thickness in Alcoholics: Evidence of Neurotoxicity. Erratum: Genotype variant associated with add-on memantine in bipolar II disorder (International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2014) 17 ( 979))
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1